Posted 29 January 2013 - 01:18 PM
Yamato, I should start by apologizing for writing a very long post but bear with me; can't find a way to say it more briefly!
That Mubarak’s policies were the cause of the first revolution is a given, but that is not the reason why hundreds of thousands, from all groups, classes, and age groups are demonstrating now. In 2011 people revolted to force a change, not to end up with more of the same. A brief general comparison:
- Mubarak was infuriatingly and totally out of touch with the people, his information about what was really going on in the country was filtered through a closed clique of trusted associates.
Mursi is also totally & infuriatingly out of touch with the people and the reality on the ground. He promised to unify all factions during the elections but succeeded in becoming the president of the MB and Salafists only, to the exclusion of all others. He simply listens to them only, and works for their interests only. The constitutional decree, the new constitution and its assembly are but examples.
- Mubarak repressed all dissent, accusing opponents of treason and working for ‘foreign agendas’. National security and police arrested people haphazardly, and tortured them. He disregarded the civic rights of citizens
Mursi & co. accuse opponents of treason, being agents of USA, but added ‘enemy of God and Islam’ to the list. His policies succeeded in introducing an unprecedented rift among Egyptians. ‘Civil war’ is for the first time ever mentioned in Egypt. Demonstrations are dispersed and people are arrested and tortured also by Islamist militias of a secretive international organization which is content to rule through him as an Eminence Gris, yet refuses to legalize itself or declare the sources of its finances. Civic rights are not only disregarded and curtailed, but their very definition is threatened through a constitution that openly disregards rights of women, children and minorities; does not criminalize child labor, allows arrest of citizen for extendable period of 12 hours without charges, and allows religious figures to define and enforce their version of civil rights through a morality police.
-Mubarak rigged elections, even the dead voted.
The same practices continued, ballot boxes were found in supermarkets, marked ballots trashed in side streets, poor voters were bribed, the dead continued to vote. The investigation of the pre-marked ballots in the presidential elections was never followed through.
- During Mubarak’s era, social justice was an issue; the economy was growing, but wealth did not sufficiently trickle down to the poor.
The economy is totally collapsing now, trusted associates are incapable of running it, each of Mursi’s decisions is followed by a major loss of the stock market; investors fled, the unbridled rhetoric of Islamists killed tourism, devaluation of the pound, the poor became poorer and are joined by many more. The MB’s idea of benefiting the poor is occasionally erecting stalls to sell cheaper vegetables and coupons allowing the poor 3 pitas a day (a decrease of what they consume, people who cannot afford other foods depend on eating lots of bread).
The list goes on & on, but I think my post is long enough. Mursi’s policies are on topic, they are what generated the anger and distrust leading to the demonstrations of the Ultras among others. You seem to be under the impression that only certain groups are opposed to Mursi, while the rest are backing him and the MB. The anger is general and is incrementally increasing. As for your question about the courts, the judiciary should be independent; no president should have any power over it. Mursi can start by not sending his followers to besiege the Supreme Court while chanting “give us a signal and we will send them to you in body bags”, or issuing unconstitutional decrees while immunizing him, or take oath then breaking it repeatedly.
As for the 21, trust in the verdict comes from its being seen to follow due process not political expediency. Some are ‘thugs’, but others are regular football fans including minors and 18 year olds. If the population of Port Said revolt and risk their lives doing that, trust that they would not be doing it to defend mass murderers. I have a bone to chew with oppression and tyranny. I would not have been as opposed to the MB had they been working for Egypt, not exploiting it to further their own interests; in that I am not motivated by my being a Copt, but by my being an Egyptian.