Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

How Obama will deliver his climate promise


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1    Render

Render

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,080 posts
  • Joined:23 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 31 January 2013 - 09:40 AM

Quote

BARACK OBAMA is certainly talking the talk on climate change - promising to put the fight against global warming at the heart of his second term. What's more surprising is that the US - historically, the world's biggest emitter - actually seems to be walking the walk. It is on track to meet Obama's 2009 pledge to cut US emissions by 17 per cent, from 2005 levels, by 2020. The target could even be exceeded, which may give a boost to the long-stalled international climate talks.
There's no realistic possibility of passing new laws to curb US greenhouse gas emissions - Republican control of the House of Representatives will see to that. So some pundits were scratching their heads at Obama's climate pledge in last week's inaugural address. But independent analyses paint an upbeat picture of the progress he can make simply by using existing laws.

http://www.newscient...te-promise.html


#2    Valdemar the Great

Valdemar the Great

    Unsafe at Any Speed

  • Member
  • 24,102 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Sea of Okhotsk

  • Vampires are people too.

Posted 31 January 2013 - 10:25 AM

There, take that, cynics! He promises, see, and he delivers! :-*

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image


#3    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,213 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 31 January 2013 - 11:08 AM

Let me guess? By turning down the thermostats in the WH by 2 degrees?

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#4    TheLastLazyGun

TheLastLazyGun

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,144 posts
  • Joined:08 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The edge of the West Pennine Moors, Northern England

Posted 31 January 2013 - 12:35 PM

And still the alarmists continue, completely ignoring the facts and figures which show they are wrong in the other threads.


#5    Valdemar the Great

Valdemar the Great

    Unsafe at Any Speed

  • Member
  • 24,102 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Sea of Okhotsk

  • Vampires are people too.

Posted 31 January 2013 - 01:40 PM

I wish we could get some facts & figures that are completely (carbon?) neutral and uninfluenced by bias one way or the other, but everything seems to have some agenda behind it.

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


Posted Image


#6    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,957 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 31 January 2013 - 03:00 PM

View PostTheLastLazyGun, on 31 January 2013 - 12:35 PM, said:

And still the alarmists continue, completely ignoring the facts and figures which show they are wrong in the other threads.
You mean the threads which show that global warming has continued uninterrupted. If you can't refute the science - just deny it.

Br Cornelius

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson

#7    Doug1o29

Doug1o29

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,923 posts
  • Joined:01 Aug 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:oklahoma

Posted 31 January 2013 - 03:13 PM

View PostLord Vetinari, on 31 January 2013 - 01:40 PM, said:

I wish we could get some facts & figures that are completely (carbon?) neutral and uninfluenced by bias one way or the other, but everything seems to have some agenda behind it.
Here's a start:
NCDC Station Data Address:
http://www7.ncdc.noa...D82A?_page=0

Storm Data address is:
http://www7.ncdc.noa.../IPS/sd/sd.html

PDSI address is:
http://www1.ncdc.noa...rd964x.pdsi.txt

Global Temperature Anomalies address is:
http://data.giss.nas...GLB.Ts dSST.txt

Hadley-Crutcher 3 address is:
http://www.cru.uea.a...hadcrut3ggl.txt

Keeling's (CO2) curve is available on-line, too, but I don't have the address just now.

GTA and HadCrut3 are global averages.  The others are for the US.  You will have to do your own analyses.  If you lack the time or the know-how, you will have to use somebody else's.

If you want, you can use the NCDC data to track the information back to the individual station.  It takes three file drawers to hold the printouts for the State of Arkansas (And at that, I edited out a lot of irrelevant stuff.), so you'll have a lot of work ahead.  But there's history in those reports, too.  The early editions for Oklahoma are entitled:  "Oklahoma and the Indian Nations."  You'll learn a lot about early frosts damaging fruit crops and rainstorms that drown settlers, down to the names of individuals.

OR:  you can go to peer-reviewed journals.  They're pretty technical and usually require a good background in the subject just to understand what they're saying.  The scientific concepts, themselves, are usually pretty simple, but the data analysis that backs them up can be nightmarish material.

Anyway, it's out there.  All you have to do is read it.
Doug

Edited by Doug1o29, 31 January 2013 - 03:21 PM.

If I have seen farther than other men, it is because I stood on the shoulders of giants. --Bernard de Chartres
The beginning of knowledge is the realization that one doesn't and cannot know everything.
Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. --Hippocrates
Ignorance is not an opinion. --Adam Scott

#8    Render

Render

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,080 posts
  • Joined:23 Nov 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 01 February 2013 - 08:50 AM

View Postquestionmark, on 31 January 2013 - 11:08 AM, said:

Let me guess? By turning down the thermostats in the WH by 2 degrees?

It's all in the article yanno...

Quote

But independent analyses paint an upbeat picture of the progress he can make simply by using existing laws.
But the biggest contribution comes from regulations under the Clean Air Act, including vehicle fuel economy standards that are already in place. Controls on emissions from power plants that are expected from the US Environmental Protection Agency make up the rest (see diagram). Given all this, RFF estimates that the US could cut emissions by 16.3 per cent by 2020.
"The 2020 target does seem to be in reach," agrees Kevin Kennedy, who heads the US climate change initiative at World Resources Institute, also in Washington DC.
According to Woerman, about two-thirds of the cuts outlined in the RFF report are already "baked-in". And emissions could be pushed down further still if the EPA is aggressive in regulating existing US power plants.
The RFF report assumed that the EPA would demand modest efficiency improvements for each type of plant. But the agency could get stronger cuts by setting a combined and more ambitious target for coal and gas-fired plants, and leave it to utilities and states to decide how to get there.
According to an analysis from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), released in December, more aggressive policies like these could cut emissions from fossil fuel plants by 26 per cent, from 2005 levels, by 2020 - equivalent to an additional 10 per cent shaved off total US emissions.
Other options open to Obama include an aggressive phase-out of hydrofluorocarbons - refrigerants that are potent greenhouse gases - and plugging methane leaks (see "Fixing America's gas leak").



#9    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 01 February 2013 - 09:07 AM

Its a cover up and diversion for gun control. His gotta find his hearts and minds somewhere as many have bailed off the Obama train lately.


#10    Doug1o29

Doug1o29

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,923 posts
  • Joined:01 Aug 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:oklahoma

Posted 01 February 2013 - 01:39 PM

View PostAsteroidX, on 01 February 2013 - 09:07 AM, said:

Its a cover up and diversion for gun control. His gotta find his hearts and minds somewhere as many have bailed off the Obama train lately.
So many that his approval rating is at an all-time high.
Doug

If I have seen farther than other men, it is because I stood on the shoulders of giants. --Bernard de Chartres
The beginning of knowledge is the realization that one doesn't and cannot know everything.
Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. --Hippocrates
Ignorance is not an opinion. --Adam Scott




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users