Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

Horse meat could still be on sale in Britain

marek czerniej horse meat

  • Please log in to reply
165 replies to this topic

#136    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 7,297 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 15 February 2013 - 12:05 PM

This will be the next text craze from the compo chasers:

Have you eaten any ready meals containing mince recently, you could be entitled to compensation, please phone the  number below for a quote on how much WE can get for you.

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.

#137    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 38,358 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • "Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better." - Albert Einstein

Posted 15 February 2013 - 01:53 PM

Every day I seem to see something in the news about horse meat in the UK. This now -

Horse meat found in cottage pies sent to 47 schools in Lancashire

http://www.telegraph...Lancashire.html

Posted Image

#138    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 38,358 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • "Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better." - Albert Einstein

Posted 15 February 2013 - 01:57 PM

Supermarkets tests find no horsemeat

http://www.ft.com/cm...l#axzz2KyZf234a

Posted Image

#139    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 7,297 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 15 February 2013 - 02:48 PM

View PostStill Waters, on 15 February 2013 - 01:53 PM, said:

Every day I seem to see something in the news about horse meat in the UK. This now -

Horse meat found in cottage pies sent to 47 schools in Lancashire

http://www.telegraph...Lancashire.html

NOOOO, it can`t be!! some MP was saying last night that the schools had not been affected....personally I thought that was horse poo. Thanks for clarifying it.

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.

#140    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 7,297 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 15 February 2013 - 02:51 PM

Personally I wish this much fuss had been made over the halal meat which they did not tell us about on our shelves, now they have to label it....I am more disgusted to see that on our shelves than a horsemeat!!





ps: I did tell the supermarkets how disgusted I was by it too, but obviously their profits are more important than some poor animal getting slaughtered because of a religious belief.

If it turns out that none of these horses were slaughtered, but were humanely killed, would that change anything? Doubt it, you will still see the newly packaged and labelled horse meat beside the halal meat.

Edited by freetoroam, 15 February 2013 - 02:55 PM.

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.

#141    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,277 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 15 February 2013 - 02:53 PM

There are zoning laws about Durian.


#142    redhen

redhen

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,825 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Samsara

Posted 15 February 2013 - 05:03 PM

View PostMichelle, on 15 February 2013 - 03:49 AM, said:

Someone like you infuriates me! What if you lived in a place where it is illegal to own a gun? Even if you had one, could you do it? What about tiny pets...would you shoot a seriously ill mouse, hamster, gerbil or bird or would you do the humane thing and wring it's poor little neck?

I was merely showing that there were more humane methods than letting horses starve to death. Personally I could not kill or euthanize any animal. The Sanskrit text in the Jain symbol avatar I have adopted translates to "nonviolence is the paramount teaching" (ahimsa paramo dharma).

Quote

The majority of people like you have never spent a lot of time around animals. They don't see the reality of life and death. I've spent my life rescuing animals...some of them you can save and some you can't. You learn to accept it and do what you can. If you can afford the expense to take each and every one of them to the vet more power to you. I've spent thousands of dollars and would be in a lot better place financially if I hadn't.

Same here. One does what one can.

Quote

I am eternally greatful my husband has a big heart and does the things I can't do. It has severely hurt him on several occasions, but it has to be done...one way or the other.

Yes, I'm dreading the day when I have to take the stray pets that have ended up at my door to the vet for euthanasia.

Quote

I totally agree, animals of any kind, should be treated more humanely, but you are preaching to the choir here, honey.

But you've stated that you eat meat, just not dog, cat or horses. It is unnecessary to eat meat in a modern agricultural society. If it's unnecessary, and it causes pain, suffering and death to animals, it is by definition, animal cruelty.


#143    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,277 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 15 February 2013 - 05:56 PM

Vegetarianism is continuously on the agenda in Vietnam, since two of the major religions, the Buddhists and the CaoDai discourage but don't prohibit eating meat.  Neither group believes in imposing its morals by law on society, so it has never become a legal issue -- just an ethical one.

The real concern is for the karma of people who work in abattoirs and similar places, who must constantly kill.  I have always seen these dire warnings as being rank superstition.  If the animal is well cared for during its life and is killed quickly and without suffering, I think one is doing them a favor,  Besides, if karma is the concern, the animal gets a lot of it providing food for others that way.

(Of course I suspect the economics of raising animals for food lead to practices not anywhere near as ideal as I would like, but this is outside my ken, and all I can do is try to encourage humane behavior).


#144    redhen

redhen

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,825 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Samsara

Posted 15 February 2013 - 10:55 PM

View PostFrank Merton, on 15 February 2013 - 05:56 PM, said:

Neither group believes in imposing its morals by law on society, so it has never become a legal issue -- just an ethical one.

Hmm, if it wasn't for William Wilberforce (and his Christian faith) imposing his morals on society, we still might have slavery. Despite what Richard Dawkins says, religion is not the root of all evil. Much of our English common law is grounded in the Judeo-Christian religions.

Quote

The real concern is for the karma of people who work in abattoirs and similar places, who must constantly kill.  I have always seen these dire warnings as being rank superstition.

There has been much work in the field of psychology that shows the detrimental effects of working in a slaughterhouse, that's not superstition, that's a fact.

Quote

If the animal is well cared for during its life and is killed quickly and without suffering, I think one is doing them a favor,

Please don't do me any favours. Thanks.

Quote

Besides, if karma is the concern, the animal gets a lot of it providing food for others that way.

Merit has to be earned. No one give anyone else merit. Sure there are plenty of Jataka tales of the Buddha offering slices of his flesh to tigers. But that's exactly what they are, tales.

Quote

(Of course I suspect the economics of raising animals for food lead to practices not anywhere near as ideal as I would like, but this is outside my ken, and all I can do is try to encourage humane behavior).

Outside your ken? Are you from another planet? Do you not feel pain and suffering? Would you like to be well cared for during your life and then killed quickly so someones taste buds are satisfied?


#145    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 7,297 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 16 February 2013 - 01:31 PM

i am a meat eater and always will be. As Frank said,  "If the animal is well cared for during its life and is killed quickly and without suffering," then there is nothing wrong with this.
Nature can be far far more cruel if you see the way many animals kill their prey. As animals ourselves, i believe that killing an animal without causing it suffering to eat it, is no where near as cruel as nature itself.
I dread to think if everyone in this world became a vegetarian...the amount of food they would need to grow to cater for everyone would mean one thing in the end...more chemicals and more crops grown unnaturally.

Edited by freetoroam, 16 February 2013 - 01:32 PM.

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.

#146    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,277 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 16 February 2013 - 01:38 PM

I am not persuaded that vegetarianism would not be better for the environment.  Meat production is a singularly inefficient way to produce calories, and produces lots of CO2 and methane -- both gases serving to warm the planet.

The abolition of slavery as a moral crusade is fine, but the historical reality didn't work that way, and even if it had you had there a situation of oppression. All else being equal, I very much prefer it if people don't try to impose their personal morals on others.


#147    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 7,297 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 16 February 2013 - 01:52 PM

View PostFrank Merton, on 16 February 2013 - 01:38 PM, said:

I am not persuaded that vegetarianism would not be better for the environment.  Meat production is a singularly inefficient way to produce calories, and produces lots of CO2 and methane -- both gases serving to warm the planet.

The abolition of slavery as a moral crusade is fine, but the historical reality didn't work that way, and even if it had you had there a situation of oppression. All else being equal, I very much prefer it if people don't try to impose their personal morals on others.
If someone wants to be a vegetarian, great...for them.
But can you imagine the amount of GM foods they would have to produce. I can not find a single tomato in the supermarkets which does not resemble a soft tennis ball.
Our population is too big for us all to eat non GM foods and the producers would never agree to it, can you imagine the profits they would lose?
As you say, as long as the animal has had a good life and is killed humanely, then there is nothing wrong with that.

To all those who say that eating meat is cruel...I would like to know their stance on how nature really works out in the wild!
This being said, I am against halal and breeding animals in cages.

More farm land is being sold off and new housing estates are being built to accommodate the ever increasing population....maybe the veggies should address that issue first.

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.

#148    redhen

redhen

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,825 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Samsara

Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:55 PM

View Postfreetoroam, on 16 February 2013 - 01:31 PM, said:

i am a meat eater and always will be.

Yes, we've had this discussion before.

Quote

As Frank said,  "If the animal is well cared for during its life and is killed quickly and without suffering," then there is nothing wrong with this.

Did you watch the documentary Earthlings I posted on this thread?

Quote

Nature can be far far more cruel if you see the way many animals kill their prey.

No, cruelty means unnecessary pain. Carnivores that kill and eat other animals do so not to satisfy some perverse, sadistic urge. They do it so they can continue to live. We (humans) are not obligate carnivores. Therefore, eating meat is by definition, cruel.

Quote

I dread to think if everyone in this world became a vegetarian...the amount of food they would need to grow to cater for everyone would mean one thing in the end...more chemicals and more crops grown unnaturally.

More energy, water and crops are needed to feed cattle than if they were to be applied for crops for direct consumption.


#149    redhen

redhen

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,825 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Samsara

Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:59 PM

View PostFrank Merton, on 16 February 2013 - 01:38 PM, said:

I am not persuaded that vegetarianism would not be better for the environment.  Meat production is a singularly inefficient way to produce calories, and produces lots of CO2 and methane -- both gases serving to warm the planet.

Agreed.

Quote

The abolition of slavery as a moral crusade is fine, but the historical reality didn't work that way, and even if it had you had there a situation of oppression.

Are you saying that because a societal moral improvement does not take place overnight and with an ideal outcome, we should not pursue them?

Quote

All else being equal, I very much prefer it if people don't try to impose their personal morals on others.

Things are not equal. You live in a human society, and can not escape it's current norms and values.


#150    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 7,297 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 16 February 2013 - 04:06 PM

View Postredhen, on 16 February 2013 - 03:55 PM, said:

Yes, we've had this discussion before.



Did you watch the documentary Earthlings I posted on this thread?



No, cruelty means unnecessary pain. Carnivores that kill and eat other animals do so not to satisfy some perverse, sadistic urge. They do it so they can continue to live. We (humans) are not obligate carnivores. Therefore, eating meat is by definition, cruel.



More energy, water and crops are needed to feed cattle than if they were to be applied for crops for direct consumption.
Sorry, did not see the documentary, but will have a look, thankyou.

I will beg to differ on the eating meat is cruel, but respect your own personal view.

My grandmother lived off her land, she grew all her own vegetables. But she could not live with out her meat. Rabbits were often on the menu, none of them were inhumanely killed.....I would rather see a rabbit on my plate i knew was humanely killed than see one squashed on the road by some car.
Where I live at the moment, in the woods there are often  rabbit skeletons, foxes love rabbits, but there is no shortage of suffering when the fox gets hold of them.

Humans have always hunted for food, and meat has been part of that. I am glad that we do not all have to kill animals in an inhumane way, but am still shocked at the fact that rituals like halal are still allowed to sell the meat in the western world.

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users