Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Deadliest ever US sniper killed

chris kyle sniper rough creek lodge us navy seal

  • Please log in to reply
143 replies to this topic

#76    Coffey

Coffey

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,671 posts
  • Joined:09 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norwich UK

  • "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill

Posted 04 February 2013 - 12:47 PM

View Postjoc, on 03 February 2013 - 11:31 PM, said:

Coffey, all you are doing is regurgitating Democrat and Media talking points about the war.  I will explain it to you.  9/11 happened...unprovoked attack on our homeland.  Good thing they didn't have a nuclear weapon eh?  Saddam Hussein was working a nuclear weapons program...playing games with the agency that watchdog that sort of thing.  Lying to everyone and sticking his middle finger in the face of the world by continuing to disregard the UN sanctions against him.  Every day he shot at our planes over the UN Sanctioned No Fly Zone.  So...he is a man that cannot be trusted.  Don't forget he used WMD against his OWN people...not a very nice man.  The lesson we learned from 911 is that we cannot wait for Terrorists to attack us again.  We can no longer just sit back and ignore the mal intentions of madmen.  Saddam played games with the world.  He lost.  And...btw...he did have WMDs.  Quadafi was more than happy to tell us that he received Mustard Gas from Saddam and that he didn't want it.  I guess he was afraid he might be next on the Shock and Awe list.
There...I hope I have educated you more than the drivel you get from listening to CNN.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I don't watch any of the big media outlets like CNN.

Saddam Husein had nothing to do with 9/11, that is a common fact. Saddam Husein had nothing to do with Al Qaeda.

We invaded Afghanistan because of Al Qaeda, not Iraq.  The only excuse for Iraq was the non existent WMD's. By the the way mustard gas is not a WMD... LOL


Educate yourself on the Iraq war please, you clearly have no clue about it.

When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

#77    joc

joc

    Adminstrator of Cosmic Blues

  • Member
  • 14,419 posts
  • Joined:12 Dec 2003
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milky Way Galaxy 3rd planet

  • They're wearing steel that's bright and true
    They carry news that must get through
    They choose the path where no-one goes

Posted 04 February 2013 - 12:50 PM

View PostCoffey, on 04 February 2013 - 12:47 PM, said:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I don't watch any of the big media outlets like CNN.

Saddam Husein had nothing to do with 9/11, that is a common fact. Saddam Husein had nothing to do with Al Qaeda.

We invaded Afghanistan because of Al Qaeda, not Iraq.  The only excuse for Iraq was the non existent WMD's. By the the way mustard gas is not a WMD... LOL


Educate yourself on the Iraq war please, you clearly have no clue about it.
Mustard gas is not a WMD?  Tell that to the Kurds.  You don't listen beause you think you know it all...you don't know it all...actually it seems you know very little.  Life requires cognitive thinking  skills in order to effectively address the maze.  Your arrogance is very telling.

Posted Image
once i believed that starlight could guide me home
now i know that light is old and stars are cold

ReverbNation

#78    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Closed
  • 8,732 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:27North 80West

Posted 04 February 2013 - 02:26 PM

View PostCrimsonKing, on 03 February 2013 - 09:31 PM, said:

I for one am up for the idea of letting go of our military and letting everyone defend themselves.Since following orders is akin to being a criminal these human lives should not be asked to defend us!War has happened before and will happen again,let the ones who do not like or want guns or military defend themselves with whistles and ball bats.Everyone will be happy this way.I sure as hell know i would be!

"I was just following orders" was the central theme offered by those Third Reich fellows we prosecuted at Nuremberg.  It seems invoking that theme in this case is getting perilously close to a slippery slope.

If it were up to me, the dead sniper would still be alive, but it's not up to me.

The facts are that we invaded both Afghanistan and Iraq under fraud and deception.  By definition, and I sure wish it weren't so, we committed military aggression against those countries because we lied about everything. :cry:


#79    Coffey

Coffey

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,671 posts
  • Joined:09 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norwich UK

  • "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill

Posted 04 February 2013 - 03:35 PM

View Postjoc, on 04 February 2013 - 12:50 PM, said:

Mustard gas is not a WMD?  Tell that to the Kurds.  You don't listen beause you think you know it all...you don't know it all...actually it seems you know very little.  Life requires cognitive thinking  skills in order to effectively address the maze.  Your arrogance is very telling.

My arrogance, you think Iraq was involved in 9/11, even Bush said they where not... Yet he's the one who lied about WMD's... lol

As for Iraq and WMD's:

Quote

Later U.S.-led inspections agreed that Iraq had earlier abandoned its WMD programs, but asserted Iraq had an intention to pursue those programs if UN sanctions were ever lifted.[15] Bush later said that the biggest regret of his presidency was "the intelligence failure" in Iraq,[16] while the Senate Intelligence Committee found in 2008 that his administration "misrepresented the intelligence and the threat from Iraq".[17] A key CIA informant in Iraq admitted that he lied about his allegations, "then watched in shock as it was used to justify the war".[18] In 2012, Britain will help the Iraqi government dispose of what is left of Saddam's chemical weapons. The teams will work to safely destroy remnants of munitions and chemical warfare agents left over from Saddam's regime.[19]

From Wikipedia.

The WMD's we went in for where not mustard Gas.

Saddam had mustard gas and used it, but that was not the WMD's Bush meant.

All this can be read on Wikipedia.


AGAIN, IRAQ had NOTHING to do with 9/11.

WMD's = Iraq (which was false)
9/11 = Afghanistan

Edited by Coffey, 04 February 2013 - 03:36 PM.

When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

#80    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,759 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 04 February 2013 - 03:49 PM

I had avoided this thread as probably too upsetting for me, and I was right, but I just got through forcing myself to scan it.

The idea that the murderer was under some influence so as to eliminate a danger to society who was nevertheless a hero (who would therefore be inconvenient to kill any other way) certainly comes to mind, and I usually dismiss such government conspiracy theories out-of-hand.

That the man was so good at killing people and did it so often tells me he enjoyed doing it.  We are good at what we enjoy.  This was more than just war necessity here.  That would also explain why later he became a government inconvenience.

As several people said, "What goes around comes around," and this does seem to be evidence supporting that idea.  Still, we do not wish anyone dead, no matter what.  We may expect something of the sort, but we do not celebrate its coming to pass.  Justice may demand it, but that does not mean we want it -- doing so brings on the same negative cycle to us as we are observing.


#81    CrimsonKing

CrimsonKing

    Common Sense Aficionado

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,058 posts
  • Joined:18 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DarkSide of TheMoon

  • "It does not require a majority to prevail,but rather an irate,tireless minority keen to set brushfires in peoples minds" Sam Adams

Posted 04 February 2013 - 04:16 PM

View PostFrank Merton, on 04 February 2013 - 03:49 PM, said:

I had avoided this thread as probably too upsetting for me, and I was right, but I just got through forcing myself to scan it.

The idea that the murderer was under some influence so as to eliminate a danger to society who was nevertheless a hero (who would therefore be inconvenient to kill any other way) certainly comes to mind, and I usually dismiss such government conspiracy theories out-of-hand.

That the man was so good at killing people and did it so often tells me he enjoyed doing it.  We are good at what we enjoy.  This was more than just war necessity here.  That would also explain why later he became a government inconvenience.

As several people said, "What goes around comes around," and this does seem to be evidence supporting that idea.  Still, we do not wish anyone dead, no matter what.  We may expect something of the sort, but we do not celebrate its coming to pass.  Justice may demand it, but that does not mean we want it -- doing so brings on the same negative cycle to us as we are observing.

Ok said i was done here but obviously some here do not get what has been said.This man was sent to do a job the gov ordered him to do!It was not this man acting on his own,his job was to watch the back of other lives and make sure they came back alive!He did so very well,to say he got what he deserved you counter act your own statements about death.Did this man declare war on other nations?Did you vote this man into office to start said wars?I didnt think so,he was a soldier.People now days have stopped realizing your gov works for you,they are your employees not the other way around.You dont like what they do join together and demand they stop sending people over there on your account because tearing a single soldier apart for what your appointed employees do is stupid.Yes babe ruth we did invade many soldiers have disagreed with the invasion,again do not tear the soldier apart for this blame your gov the soldiers have not lied about anything,the soldiers commited no fraud.1 question if you were a soldier and read this kind of stuff being said about you and your fellow group would you ever if need be defend there lives with your own?This man did not die on a battle field,he was murdered in cold blood trying to help out another former soldier defending this is a disgrace.

"If it is not advantageous,do not move.If objectives can not be attained,do not employ the army.Unless endangered do not engage in warfare.The ruler cannot mobilize the army out of personal anger.The general can not engage in battle because of personal frustration.When it is advantageous,move;when not advantageous,stop.Anger can revert to happiness,annoyance can revert to joy,but a vanquished state cannot be revived,the dead cannot be brought back to life." Sun-Tzu

#82    Dan'O

Dan'O

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 656 posts
  • Joined:24 Aug 2004
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:05 PM

View PostCoffey, on 04 February 2013 - 03:35 PM, said:

My arrogance, you think Iraq was involved in 9/11

There was evidence. But without direct photo/audio is was a mute point.

http://archives.cnn....iraq/index.html
http://archives.cnn....ings/index.html
http://archives.cnn....inv.czech.atta/
http://prague.tv/pil...ragueconnection
http://www.worldpres...Europe/1684.cfm
http://www.spiritoft...g/iraqlinks.htm


Quote

As for Iraq and WMD's:
From Wikipedia.
The WMD's we went in for where not mustard Gas.
Saddam had mustard gas and used it, but that was not the WMD's Bush meant.
All this can be read on Wikipedia.

Sure it was. And dozens of other reasons put forth by many sources. Not just Bush.

http://www.fas.org/n.../cw/program.htm
http://www.sptimes.c...nd_deadly.shtml
http://www.planetark...-2002/story.htm

Quote

Yet he's the one who lied about WMD's... lol

If President Bush is culpable then the majority of the U.N. and its members (at the time) were as well:

http://news.bbc.co.u...ast/2761261.stm
http://www.fas.org/n...0302-iraq-5.htm
http://en.wikipedia....Resolution_1441
http://www.iwar.org..../2003/02-25.htm

This was not about one man deciding the fate of a murderous regime. And people that spout it off like it was are fools and either refuse multiple facts or are purposely negating them for reasons of personal bias and/or to simply troll.

There was a plethora of valid reasons to end Saddam's homicidal reign. If you miss him then that is your problem. There are plenty who do not.

I'm not even sure why I am rehashing this 10 yo troll induced debate anyway...

I did find it funny that all the wh.gov links I had from a decade ago concerning these points are all mysteriously gone from the .gov sites. And I am not talking about overtly controversial links either. Even simple ones like numbers and countries of the coalition... They may be out there somewhere...

Meh, I am done. /


#83    Bavarian Raven

Bavarian Raven

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,716 posts
  • Joined:14 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:British Columbia

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:08 PM

Quote

That the man was so good at killing people and did it so often tells me he enjoyed doing it.  We are good at what we enjoy. This was more than just war necessity here.  That would also explain why later he became a government inconvenience.

How so? Was the Finnish Sniper who took out over 1000 Soviet soldiers in the USSR/Finnish war doing more then what was necessary? No. He, like this American, was fighting for his country. Just because you are good at it, doesn't mean you enjoy it, or are doing more then is necessary. :yes:


#84    Corp

Corp

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 6,951 posts
  • Joined:19 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:23 PM

So it only took four posts for the tinfoil to come out. Stay classy UM. :rolleyes:


Sad that the guy died, though seems odd to have someone trying to deal with PTSD to be around loaded guns. Hopefully as the investigation continues more information will come to light. Though given what a horrible mess this thread has become I wouldn't be surprised if the mods locked it.

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth a war, is much worse...A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

#85    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,759 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:29 PM

This sort of person volunteers.  They are good at it or others would replace them.  We are good at what we like doing.  The cover of war is often cover for sadistic and murderous behaviors.

These are facts.  We cannot draw any conclusions from them.  The details we know don't permit it. His subsequent death is almost certainly unrelated, and is tragic.

If I were to be called to defend my country, I would do so, in spite of my beliefs and my abhorrence of killing and my knowledge of what engaging in such activity would mean to my being.  I don't think, however, that I could possibly volunteer for that sort of thing.

If it were something other than my country, such as my personal safety, I would rather die than kill someone.


#86    CrimsonKing

CrimsonKing

    Common Sense Aficionado

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,058 posts
  • Joined:18 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DarkSide of TheMoon

  • "It does not require a majority to prevail,but rather an irate,tireless minority keen to set brushfires in peoples minds" Sam Adams

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:43 PM

View PostFrank Merton, on 04 February 2013 - 05:29 PM, said:

This sort of person volunteers.  They are good at it or others would replace them.  We are good at what we like doing.  The cover of war is often cover for sadistic and murderous behaviors.

These are facts.  We cannot draw any conclusions from them.  The details we know don't permit it. His subsequent death is almost certainly unrelated, and is tragic.

If I were to be called to defend my country, I would do so, in spite of my beliefs and my abhorrence of killing and my knowledge of what engaging in such activity would mean to my being.  I don't think, however, that I could possibly volunteer for that sort of thing.

If it were something other than my country, such as my personal safety, I would rather die than kill someone.

Ok frank you lost me a bit on that last line are you saying you would die for your country,but not to defend yourself or the ones you love?

I would risk my life for the country that allowed me to live freely and enjoy the life that others died for in the past.Myself personally if anyone tried to take my life or any i cared about they best know they are playing a 50/50 game and best understand the consequences!

"If it is not advantageous,do not move.If objectives can not be attained,do not employ the army.Unless endangered do not engage in warfare.The ruler cannot mobilize the army out of personal anger.The general can not engage in battle because of personal frustration.When it is advantageous,move;when not advantageous,stop.Anger can revert to happiness,annoyance can revert to joy,but a vanquished state cannot be revived,the dead cannot be brought back to life." Sun-Tzu

#87    Coffey

Coffey

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,671 posts
  • Joined:09 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norwich UK

  • "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:55 PM

View PostDan, on 04 February 2013 - 05:05 PM, said:


There was the exact same evidence the hijackers had met with CIA... So what does that telly ou?

The fact is the reasons for war with Iraq was WMD's nothing to do with 9/11, Afghanistan was the the war brought on from 9/11.

View PostDan, on 04 February 2013 - 05:05 PM, said:

Sure it was. And dozens of other reasons put forth by many sources. Not just Bush.

http://www.fas.org/n.../cw/program.htm
http://www.sptimes.c...nd_deadly.shtml
http://www.planetark...-2002/story.htm

Real reason is that he wouldn't play the game anymore. Not really hard to realise, if you read/learn more into the past, not just the 5 years before.

View PostDan, on 04 February 2013 - 05:05 PM, said:

If President Bush is culpable then the majority of the U.N. and its members (at the time) were as well:

http://news.bbc.co.u...ast/2761261.stm
http://www.fas.org/n...0302-iraq-5.htm
http://en.wikipedia....Resolution_1441
http://www.iwar.org..../2003/02-25.htm

I didn't say it was only Bush, in fact it was Blair who started the whole thing. I was merely pointing out that Bush admitted it was false.

View PostDan, on 04 February 2013 - 05:05 PM, said:

This was not about one man deciding the fate of a murderous regime. And people that spout it off like it was are fools and either refuse multiple facts or are purposely negating them for reasons of personal bias and/or to simply troll.

There was a plethora of valid reasons to end Saddam's homicidal reign. If you miss him then that is your problem. There are plenty who do not.

I'm not even sure why I am rehashing this 10 yo troll induced debate anyway...

I did find it funny that all the wh.gov links I had from a decade ago concerning these points are all mysteriously gone from the .gov sites. And I am not talking about overtly controversial links either. Even simple ones like numbers and countries of the coalition... They may be out there somewhere...

Meh, I am done. /

Ironically it was the US who supplied him with a lot of weapons and it was also the US who put Saddam in power of Iraq. He didn't play their game when they wanted him out, hence the war.

When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

#88    joc

joc

    Adminstrator of Cosmic Blues

  • Member
  • 14,419 posts
  • Joined:12 Dec 2003
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Milky Way Galaxy 3rd planet

  • They're wearing steel that's bright and true
    They carry news that must get through
    They choose the path where no-one goes

Posted 04 February 2013 - 05:58 PM

View PostFrank Merton, on 04 February 2013 - 05:29 PM, said:

This sort of person volunteers.  They are good at it or others would replace them.  We are good at what we like doing.  The cover of war is often cover for sadistic and murderous behaviors.

These are facts.  We cannot draw any conclusions from them.  The details we know don't permit it. His subsequent death is almost certainly unrelated, and is tragic.

If I were to be called to defend my country, I would do so, in spite of my beliefs and my abhorrence of killing and my knowledge of what engaging in such activity would mean to my being.  I don't think, however, that I could possibly volunteer for that sort of thing.

If it were something other than my country, such as my personal safety, I would rather die than kill someone.
Why do you value the life of a murderer over your own?  If a man lives, it is certain that he will die.  Or, do you  have some kind of a Jesus complex?

Posted Image
once i believed that starlight could guide me home
now i know that light is old and stars are cold

ReverbNation

#89    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 12,175 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 04 February 2013 - 06:04 PM

In hindsight, it was a moot point, Dan 'O.   In the tsunami of fear mongering this country got from the Bush administration it was anything but.

The more government you get involved in any affair, the worse off you get Dan 'O.  The UN's role in Iraq doesn't grant Bush the slightest bit of evasion of guilt.   This country and that administration should be ashamed of itself for daring to suggest that the UN or any foreign government has a damn thing to do with the sovereign independence of the United States much less control of the process of taking this country to war.  That's the most blatant way of showing disrespect for your country I can think of.   These excuses that you're making demonstrate clearly to me that you do not understand the clearest language of the US Constitution and that's the most dangerous precedent in our nation's history.  With the policies we have in place today, thanks to George W. Bush and his illustrious copy-cat Barack H. Obama, we will get attacked again in this country.  This racket is manufactured to last forever, motivated by profit, illegal, immoral, and unacceptable.

"The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the Legislature.  The Executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question" ~ James Madison
"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

#90    CrimsonKing

CrimsonKing

    Common Sense Aficionado

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,058 posts
  • Joined:18 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DarkSide of TheMoon

  • "It does not require a majority to prevail,but rather an irate,tireless minority keen to set brushfires in peoples minds" Sam Adams

Posted 04 February 2013 - 06:05 PM

View Postjoc, on 04 February 2013 - 05:58 PM, said:

Why do you value the life of a murderer over your own?  If a man lives, it is certain that he will die.  Or, do you  have some kind of a Jesus complex?

View Postjoc, on 04 February 2013 - 05:58 PM, said:

Why do you value the life of a murderer over your own?  If a man lives, it is certain that he will die.  Or, do you  have some kind of a Jesus complex?

Thats why i am confused over that last statement,I do not understand if that is what he meant or not.If so i do not comprehend that as being logical.

"If it is not advantageous,do not move.If objectives can not be attained,do not employ the army.Unless endangered do not engage in warfare.The ruler cannot mobilize the army out of personal anger.The general can not engage in battle because of personal frustration.When it is advantageous,move;when not advantageous,stop.Anger can revert to happiness,annoyance can revert to joy,but a vanquished state cannot be revived,the dead cannot be brought back to life." Sun-Tzu




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users