321 replies to this topic

[Uncle Sam]

There needs to be some external investigation that is civilian, that will allow the law enforcers to be held accountable for their actions. I see so many instances we have police officers judging other police officers, but because of the thin blue line, they never hold each other accountable.

Edited by Uncle Sam, 14 February 2013 - 11:20 PM.

[AsteroidX]

OOPS !! 1billion....thats alot.

http://www.huffingto...hp_ref=politics

punishment. deferred prosecution while the slaves work off the misapropriated funds. Fascism at its best.

Edited by AsteroidX, 15 February 2013 - 12:02 AM.

[aztek]

AsteroidX, on 15 February 2013 - 12:01 AM, said:

OOPS !! 1billion....thats alot.

http://www.huffingto...hp_ref=politics

punishment. deferred prosecution while the slaves work off the misapropriated funds. Fascism at its best.

wow, talking about addiction, ,,,,,, at least she injected money in local economy. lol

[Detective Mystery 2013]

The Silver Thong, on 14 February 2013 - 04:24 AM, said:

It will remain a conspiracy theory because thats what they wanted. Now no trial no first hand testimony. The corruption will continue. I do expect more of this type of thing to happen.  I kinda hope he got away and will turn himself in to a protected enviroment. I do think he`s dead though.

When all is said and done, he's just another disgruntled employee with a grudge. In this case, he targeted law enforcement officers and their families. He's just like the cliche of the mailman who goes postal. He's not a modern hero with a just cause.

[Ryinrea]

Detective Mystery 2013, on 15 February 2013 - 03:34 AM, said:

When all is said and done, he's just another disgruntled employee with a grudge. In this case, he targeted law enforcement officers and their families. He's just like the cliche of the mailman who goes postal. He's not a modern hero with a just cause.

So you call this someone with a grudge? They planed on killing him he's not a mailman; who went postal  Please I dare you to watch the video

[freetoroam]

Ryinrea, on 15 February 2013 - 08:44 AM, said:

So you call this someone with a grudge? They planed on killing him he's not a mailman; who went postal  Please I dare you to watch the video

He did have a grudge, his manifesto is proof enough how he felt and what he planned on doing.
its obvious he was going to be shot, thats what all the Americans protest about, killing a man gun man in self defence! They did exactly what was expected, and I believe he knew this more than most........he KNEW he was going to die. Rather naive for people to think he was not.

[Uncle Sam]

I don't support this guy and what he has done, definitely know there was a better way to go about this. Instead of trying to take him alive and putting him on trail, the cops decided to be his judge, jury, and executioner. They deliberately set the house on fire, cut off his exits, and burned him alive. It was inhumane and extremely cruel that reaffirmed my opinion that LAPD is pretty corrupted. Corrupted enough to deliberately whack him so that he won't be able to tell his side of the story. There needs to be a external investigation on the department to determine how deep the corruption goes, all the way up to the mayor of the city.

I have a feeling the truth is very ugly, it would make many citizens lose their trust in the LAPD, that is why they were gunning to kill him the moment they set eyes on him. It didn't matter if there were civilian casualties, because they displayed that when they immediately open fired on a vehicle that was relatively close to matching the suspect's vehicle description which resulted in two elderly ladies being harmed. They didn't even try to check if it was the suspect or not, they wanted him dead on sight. The proper thing would to have an secret operative reviewing and gathering evidence of corruptions of the department, before displaying the evidence to an civilian oversight agency that can remove police from their posts. Once that is done, there will need be certain oversight of the department to make sure they abide by the code and insure that no more citizens will become victims of the department ever again.

Edited by Uncle Sam, 15 February 2013 - 02:44 PM.

[freetoroam]

Okaaaay.
So next time someone with a gun who is OBVIOUSLY a  threat to....lets say yourself or a member of your family or a friend, you think you would try to take them alive first rather than shoot them?

This is a lot different from what we were being told on the other gun threads?
What makes a civilian think he has more right to shoot to defend himself than anyone else?

[AsteroidX]

Quote

So you call this someone with a grudge? They planed on killing him he's not a mailman; who went postal  Please I dare you to watch the video

"Burn this Mother ****er" is a bit  much and then it happens.  They said it, it happened. I guess that the thin blue line at work for ya.

[freetoroam]

AsteroidX, on 15 February 2013 - 03:15 PM, said:

"Burn this Mother ****er" is a bit  much and then it happens.  They said it, it happened. I guess that the thin blue line at work for ya.

I would say and do the same thing is someone had threatened my family.
You do not have to be a  corrupt cop to feel this way.

[aztek]

lol,
A legal loophole could prevent good Samaritans, instrumental in ending the manhunt for a fugitive ex-cop accused of killing four people, from claiming more than $1 million in reward money because Christopher Dorner died and was not captured.

http://news.yahoo.co...topstories.html

[AsteroidX]

Yeah. Pathetic

[freetoroam]

aztek, on 15 February 2013 - 06:30 PM, said:

lol,
A legal loophole could prevent good Samaritans, instrumental in ending the manhunt for a fugitive ex-cop accused of killing four people, from claiming more than $1 million in reward money because Christopher Dorner died and was not captured.

http://news.yahoo.co...topstories.html

i was going to say always read the small print, but this is not small print "for information that will lead to Mr. Dorner's capture."  it does not state dead or alive.



I love this:
The council ultimately decides how and to whom the reward will get paid. If its members are feeling generous, they could interpret the language of the original offer to make sure a worthy recipient gets paid.

We will see!

[Detective Mystery 2013]

Ryinrea, on 15 February 2013 - 08:44 AM, said:

So you call this someone with a grudge? They planed on killing him he's not a mailman; who went postal  Please I dare you to watch the video

Free To Roam answered your question very well. He definitely had a grudge. That's why he took his feuds and vendettas to the worst possible conclusions. "Grudge" might have been too *weak* of a word. He had a vendetta with law enforcement officers and their families to the point where he targeted them for death due to his personal grievances, which may or may not be based on facts. I would call that a grudge on steroids (pardon the corny cliche). Why would his actions *not* be indicative of a grudge? All of his murders were based on a grudge, and that's a common theme in these kinds of crimes.