Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Attenborough documentaries ignore gay animals

gay animals wildlife documentaries dr brett mills david attenborough

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 38,028 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • "Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better." - Albert Einstein

Posted 08 February 2013 - 09:53 PM

Sir David Attenborough's wildlife documentaries are not a true reflection of nature because they fail to acknowledge animals' "gay" behaviour, an academic has claimed.

Dr Brett Mills of the University of East Anglia accused the veteran broadcaster of espousing the idea that all animals are heterosexual despite a wealth of evidence they engage in a variety of sexual activity.

http://www.telegraph...ay-animals.html

Posted Image

#2    Yes_Man

Yes_Man

    hi

  • Member
  • 8,177 posts
  • Joined:22 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portsmouth

Posted 08 February 2013 - 10:00 PM

This is stupid, its about nature not rights or political news


#3    Hasina

Hasina

    Maximillion Hotpocket Puckershuttle

  • Member
  • 3,048 posts
  • Joined:28 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Female

  • JINKIES

Posted 08 February 2013 - 10:27 PM

I'd like him to personally come out and say why he's lying.

Posted Image

~MEH~


#4    spud the mackem

spud the mackem

    Spud the Mackem

  • Member
  • 3,441 posts
  • Joined:28 Oct 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yeo Valley,Darkest Somerset.

  • man who ask for nothing shall never be disappointed

Posted 08 February 2013 - 11:27 PM

Sir David is advised what to broadcast, anything objectional would be "cut" from the programme which is family designed watching,and "gay" animals dont come into that category,if there is such a thing.A wild animals prime objective is to find food,whether "gay" or not, and procreation comes a seasonal second, so Mills is spouting a load of K-rap, or maybe he is just jealous.

(1) try your best, ............if that dont work.
(2) try your second best, ........if that dont work
(3) give up you aint gonna win

#5    Ever Learning

Ever Learning

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,520 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Plato's Cave

Posted 09 February 2013 - 12:13 AM

dnt rip on Attenborough he can do what he wants, hes a national tresure. theres no proof of longterm gay relationships in the wild, just sexual mishaps.

www.paranormaltales.boards.net

#6    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 6,797 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 09 February 2013 - 12:26 AM

Ah yes, "Dr" Mills:


As I tweeted earlier today, my colleague Brett Mills is having a bit of an odd day. He has been pilloried on CiF, readers of the Indy website have said rude things about him and (apparently, I haven't heard it yet) Gabby Logan on Radio 5 asked him if he gets off on watching mice have sex.
Why this vitriol? Brett, a Senior Lecturer in the Film and Television Studies School at UEA, recently authored a paper arguing that animals have a right to privacy, a right frequently violated by wildlife programme makers.


So some nutter in the U.K., Dr. Brett Mills, has recently published an article claiming that animals have a right to privacy and that nature documentaries violate that right. The kicker? This nutbag isn't even a biologist. He's a faculty member of the University of East Anglia's school of film and television studies.


http://www.zoominfo....1228257549.aspx



This was last year btw.

Edited by freetoroam, 09 February 2013 - 12:27 AM.

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.

#7    Coffey

Coffey

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,671 posts
  • Joined:09 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norwich UK

  • "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill

Posted 09 February 2013 - 06:27 PM

View PostArmchair Educated, on 09 February 2013 - 12:13 AM, said:

dnt rip on Attenborough he can do what he wants, hes a national tresure. theres no proof of longterm gay relationships in the wild, just sexual mishaps.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/14479670

When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

#8    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 6,797 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 09 February 2013 - 07:19 PM

View PostCoffey, on 09 February 2013 - 06:27 PM, said:

I can not see how they can call them homosexual finches, there is nothing to indicate in the article  they have sex together.

Dr Elie and her colleagues are interested in zebra finches' behaviour. The birds establish life-long relationships and are highly social; males sing to their mates, the birds preen each other and pairs share a nest

This is ridiculous, does this mean that every man who would rather be down the pub with his mates is homosexual.
What the article fails to mention is the sexual habits of the birds, it does not say if the male birds go to the female birds to mate and then go back to the other males for company! Which I am sure in the human world, there are many men who would see nothing wrong with that. So the BBC have a very misleading title here.

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.

#9    Coffey

Coffey

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,671 posts
  • Joined:09 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norwich UK

  • "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill

Posted 09 February 2013 - 08:20 PM

View Postfreetoroam, on 09 February 2013 - 07:19 PM, said:

I can not see how they can call them homosexual finches, there is nothing to indicate in the article  they have sex together.

Dr Elie and her colleagues are interested in zebra finches' behaviour. The birds establish life-long relationships and are highly social; males sing to their mates, the birds preen each other and pairs share a nest

This is ridiculous, does this mean that every man who would rather be down the pub with his mates is homosexual.
What the article fails to mention is the sexual habits of the birds, it does not say if the male birds go to the female birds to mate and then go back to the other males for company! Which I am sure in the human world, there are many men who would see nothing wrong with that. So the BBC have a very misleading title here.


I took it as their nesting togethor meant mating.


But ther eis 2 penguins that are in a homosexual relationship. They are in a zoo though.


There is loads of evidence of it not being a mishap.

I don't know why people get so bothered by it, if anything homosexual relationships help us. i see it as part of evolution if you are talking nature. Keeps the numbers down.

When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.

#10    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 6,797 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 09 February 2013 - 08:27 PM

View PostCoffey, on 09 February 2013 - 08:20 PM, said:

I took it as their nesting togethor meant mating.


But ther eis 2 penguins that are in a homosexual relationship. They are in a zoo though.


There is loads of evidence of it not being a mishap.

I don't know why people get so bothered by it, if anything homosexual relationships help us. i see it as part of evolution if you are talking nature. Keeps the numbers down.
I think, like many men, they like their own sex company.
I wish it did keep the numbers down, among humans, but not among the "other" animals in the world.

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.

#11    Coffey

Coffey

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,671 posts
  • Joined:09 Oct 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norwich UK

  • "Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." - Winston Churchill

Posted 09 February 2013 - 09:18 PM

View Postfreetoroam, on 09 February 2013 - 08:27 PM, said:

I think, like many men, they like their own sex company.
I wish it did keep the numbers down, among humans, but not among the "other" animals in the world.


Some animals are seen repeatedly having sexual relationships wiht the same mate from the same sex.

Well in a lot of animals they need to keep their numbers down, even if we don't like it, as it's us tkaing awya their habitat. So thye will suffer with more of their own kind tkaing their food/space away.

That's why conservation is mroe difficult than a lot of people think. If there is not enough land then we can't do anything, it's our fault though. Needs to be more prevention and less trying to fix what we can't.

When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users