[Warpigs]

This image is an overexposed 44x enlargement of Lunar Orbiter frame LO-III-84-M. Taken with the medium resolution camera at a distance of at least 250 miles, it shows an object dubbed by Hoagland the "Shard". The star-like object above the "Shard" is a camera registration mark. The "Shard" has a shadow cast in the correct direction for it to be a real object on the Moon and is aligned with the local vertical rather than the grain of the film, decreasing the chance it is an emulsion abnormality. Close-ups reveal a cellular-like internal structure. Above and behind the "Shard" is the "Tower", a massive 7 mile high structure with a central "cube" suspended by a tripod like base. Enhancements of the "Tower" show a similar cellular construction to the "Shard", but with a distinctly hexagonal pattern.



Poor resolution images like this one of the "Shard" have led some to conclude it is an ephemeral "outgassing" event. However, the Enterprise Mission enhancements reveal no "spray" or splatter which would be consistent with such a conclusion. The object appears to be solid , though badly battered by meteors.



Note - These images are from Public Domain sources - not the Enterprise Mission. There are significantly better images of these and other anomalies at the Enterprise Mission web site. - MB





This extraordinary object comes from AS10-32-4822, an Apollo hand held Hasselblad photo. The "Castle" is extremely bright and plainly visible at normal magnification, making it nearly impossible for the astronaut taking the picture to have missed it. This UNENHANCED version of it shows the remarkable stacking of it's segments and belies a natural explanation, especially when you consider it is hanging several miles high in the Lunar sky. EM enhancements show a supporting structure, including a drooping cable passing through the tip, like a suspension bridge.



This large area near the crater Ukert is strikingly rectilinear and has a very distinct and unnatural looking boundary.

[Tillghast]

Woah. Those are crazy!

[Warpigs]

These images represent but a few of the many anomalous images available from NASA archives. The noted features in the images below suggest a far more interesting picture of the moon than is typically painted by mainstream astronomy, which characterizes our satellite as a stark, bland, lifeless rock. So far no adequate explanation has been presented, by either the space agency or the astronomical community, for the curiosities contained within these official NASA photographs. The hypothesis that features such as the "double craters" and "square crater," which appear on Lunar Orbiter III frame 85HI and Apollo 10's AS10-32-4822, respectively, are the work of intelligence, is as valid as any standard theory.

Below are several enlargements of what I consider to be some of the most compelling anomalies in available lunar imagery. The first image shows a strange triangular "crater," Ukert, the unusual shape of which was first noted by Richard Hoagland of The Enterprise Mission in a Lick Observatory photograph (below left). The Pentagon's recent rush mission to the moon, dubbed Clementine, returned images of Ukert which confirmed its angular internal structure and three bright spots spaced approximately 120 degrees apart (below right).



The following image presents quite a puzzle. Peppered throughout the lunar landscape are dozens and dozens of "double craters," the likes of which can never be expected to be seen in any standard model of the moon. Further confounding is the fact that the "doublets" are almost always divided at their midpoint, and are similarly aligned. The doubling is clearly not an imaging error effect, as not all of the features in the image are duplicated. [4/19/00 revision - See "'Double craters' likely to be imaging artifacts" for opposing view] Note, also, that the two similarly sized large craters in the center of the image appear to have a hexagonal shape. Obviously, something is amiss in this photo. It has been suggested that the doublets are not craters at all, but rather two-pronged "braces" supporting much larger structures suspended above the lunar surface.



Following is one of at least 12 known versions of Apollo 10 frame AS10-32-4822. (Exactly why there are a dozen or more versions of this frame is outside the scope of this brief overview, though that fact begs some explanation by the space agency.) Though it is inexplicably blacked out in the official NASA image catalogue, frame "4822" can still be ordered from the space agency. The image shows a number of striking anomalies, not the least of which is a vast region of rectilinear structure looking for all the world like an extremely dilapidated city (hence its nickname "L.A. on the moon"). Other strange features include a peculiar square "crater" scored by razor straight notches and surrounded by honeycomb like "mountains."




http://www.controver...-anomalies.html

[Warpigs]

How would something on the Moon be hanging several miles above the sky?

Creepy.

[Tillghast]

Those are very creepy. Post more!

[dunderhead]

Well done on your posts Warpigs, very interesting pics and read!
The triangular crater and the castle thing in the lunar sky looks so strange! Good stuff!.......

[Warpigs]

Objects in the sky over the Moon.



Figure 4 is significant primarily because of its location in the vicinity of the Apollo 12 landing site, and the usual assortment of bright "debris" in the dark sky above. Most noticably, there is a large "spike" very similar to one noted by Hoagland (Martian Horizons, the Journal of the Mars Mission, Vol.2, No.5) over Mare Crisium. It is also reminiscent of an object in figure 5, again above the Lunar horizon.

The sheer volume of these bright objects in the Lunar sky has now become an issue on it's own. Either NASA had big problems with its care and maintenance of the Lunar Orbiter and Apollo photographs (as has been alleged by some debunkers) or there is ALOT of "stuff" hanging in the Lunar sky which ought not to be there.

The "haze" of bright spots was visible and somewhat more pronounced in the source material, but other features, the "spike" for example, were not. The NSSDC negative should provide an excellent comparison between the two disparate data sets, and hopefully show whether these anomalies are merely dust, scratches, or actual Lunar objects.

http://www.lunaranom....com/f4anal.htm

[Warpigs]

Huge machine on the Moon?



The "Longhorn"

This looks to be a basically symmetrical object with 2 central "nodes" and curved arms extending from the central body. There appears to be some underlying support just to the left of the right hand curved "arm", but the central spherical "node" looks to be above the ground, judging by the shadow beneath it. Note that is also sits in what resembles an excavated "pen" or platform, which is reasonably rectilinear from this resolution. I am not aware of any accepted process that could account for this object forming naturally.

Using CATIA, Computer Aided Three Dimensional Interactive Application, I have created a three dimensional interpretation of the "Longhorn" from the Tycho Anomalies page (A Village on the Moon?). Since some objects are difficult to discern from 2D photography, I hoped that creating a 3D model might help to pick out general form and background details. Using this method, it becomes fairly obvious just how impossible it is for this object to be natural. Steve and I now examining further images in the hopes of confirming the shape and detail. I have included the Clementine image for comparison.

I have also captured a number of images of this model to create a 360 degree rotation around the "Longhorn".




http://www.lunaranom...ring_of_the.htm

[Warpigs]

Astronauts amongst "glass domes"and being kept secret by NASA?

On the 21 March, 1996, Richard C.Hoagland held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. Here he presented a number of new, stunning NASA photos taken during the Apollo Lunar Missions showing astronauts among highly eroded, massive, ancient, alien glass structures!

Unfortunately, the US Press "blacked-out" this press conference, no major news networks such as C-SPAN, CNN, NBC or ABC broadcast this live as had been expected. Others simply ridiculed Hoagland in the 30 second sound bite at the "bottom-of-the-hour" news programs. Fortunately not all journalists gave Hoagland this disgusting treatment - (see the Sarah McClendon Report).



Blow-up of part of Apollo 10 frame 4822 (AS-10-32-4822) of an enormous "specular reflection" of the sun from a mile-sized sheet of glass! [Large Version]


Frame 4822 is a "mystery frame" since Hoagland has at least 10 different versions of this frame. On the photo catalogues this frame appears blacked out. NASA seems to have hidden a whole sequence of images by giving them the same frame number!



A photograph of astronaut Alan Bean shows the photographer, Pete Conrad, reflected in Bean's helmet visor. Also reflected in the visor is a "geometric object" hanging several feet above the lunar surface. Also visible is the shadow created by this object. The object seems to be suspended in a "grid" of surrounding glass-like structure!

[Warpigs]

Standing in front of a "glass dome"?

[Warpigs]

[Warpigs]

Apollo 14 astronaut, Ed Mitchell is putting up the TV camera at Fra Mauro ... apparently oblivious to a highly complex, 3-D, glass structure arching overhead! Note the numerous horizontal, vertical and diagonal linear features.



Notice the "glass-like" object in the background?

[Warpigs]

Strange "glass-like" object behing astronaut

Apollo 12 astronaut, Alan Bean can be seen carrying an ALSEP science package to its deployment site. In the distance, the lunar module "Intrepid" is visible. On further enhancement, a photographic artifact (a lens flare) can be seen "framing" the astronaut. However note the sparkling, highly geometric material clearly visible ALL OVER the sky in this version of the photo.

[Stellar]

About that reflection off of the visor... the Soviets had sent a secret probe to the moon to arrive, pick up a sample of the moons surface, and return just before Apollo 11, so that it could claim it won and it did with a robot what it took american people to do. It may very well be that probe.

[Warpigs]

Glass dome again.




This may be a photograph of the extraordinary glass dome covering the region of the moon known as Sinus Medii. It was taken by the unmanned Surveyor 6 on November 24, 1967, one hour after sunset.





(Above)
Soviet example of a "lunar dome"? This photo, taken by the Soviet Zond 3 unmanned spacecraft (July 20, 1965), was taken on the farside of the moon. Did this photo and other similar ones cause the sudden cancellation of a manned Soviet circumlunar mission only 3 years later? The structure rises ten miles above the lunar limb!