Here are some stats.
Back in 1997, after 18 years of Conservative rule (Conservative governments are always good for our education system), British children in ordinary secondary schools ranked in the top 5 in the world for achievements in maths and science.
In 1997, Labour came to power and Tony Blair was shouting "Education! Education! Education!", in the misguided belief that there was something wrong with our education system, despite the fact that the OECD Pisa tables showed otherwise. As soon as good-education-hating Labour got to work, our children suddenly plummetted in the OECD Pisa tables. Our children are now in 20-odd place in the OECD Pisa tables for maths and science. When Andrew Adonis joined Tony Blair’s team in 1998, the education budget stood at £39 billion. Ten years later, when he left the Department for Children, Schools and Families, the budget had DOUBLED. Yet, despite this, educational standard slipped. Despite Labour's "spend spend spend" our education system became a "mess mess mess".
Here's another stat. In 1997, when comprehensive schools were much better than they are now, 41% of parents said they would not consider independent education for their children. By 2011, this had fallen to 27%. Why is that? It's because children in independent schools, many of which are no more selective than most sixth-form colleges, are three times more likely to gain an A or A* at A-level than those in state schools, so it is not surprising that 57% of parents (i.e. the majority) would send their children to an independent school if they could afford to.
The Left might deride those who give their children a good education as "snobs" but, if parents have the money, why shouldn't they spend it on giving their children a good education? All children should be given the best education there is. So it's no suprise that most British parents would send their children private if they could afford it.
Edited by TheLastLazyGun, 22 February 2013 - 02:54 PM.