Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

Watching dog fights still legal in Montana


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1    redhen

redhen

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,825 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Samsara

Posted 22 February 2013 - 01:57 PM

"Just last week, legislators on the House Agriculture committee tabled (killed) House Bill 279, which would have closed a loophole in state statute by making spectating at dogfights a misdemeanor. That’s right, dogfighting. It’s a felony in all 50 states, but Montana is the ONLY one where spectating is still legal–placing it dead last in a ranking of state dogfighting laws."

http://animalblawg.w...013/02/20/5665/

Those who opposed this modest compassionate bill used the slippery slope argument. "“While I don’t support dogfighting, or any animal fighting that way, one question I had here…we heard a lot about dogs…and this pertains to all animals, I want your legal opinion…if in a rodeo a Brahma bull decides to take on one of the pick-up men’s horses and that becomes an animal fight, what is gonna happen to the rodeo spectators and the rodeo event?”"

And that brilliant logic killed the bill. So if you want to legally watch dogs fight to the death, Montana is the place to go.

Why am I posting this in the Philosophy forum?

"Animal rights are no more a matter of opinion than is any other moral matter"
- Gary L. Francione

p.s. any UM readers live in Montana? If so, what are your thoughts about your legislators in this regard?


#2    Jeffertonturner

Jeffertonturner

    Hero Squad

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,094 posts
  • Joined:21 Jan 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Brunswick, Canada

  • I may not be the smartest, or the best looking, or the most successful but...what was I saying? I'm depressed.

Posted 22 February 2013 - 02:00 PM

The evil in the world is sad, but no longer shocking. Which is also sad.

~Life goes by pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while -and do whatever you want all the time -you can miss it.~

#3    Taun

Taun

    A dashing moose about town...

  • Member
  • 6,302 posts
  • Joined:19 May 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tornado Alley (Oklahoma)

Posted 22 February 2013 - 02:31 PM

While it is not illegal to watch one it is illegal to have one...

The wording of the bill may have been vauge enough that if you happen upon two dogs fighting on their own (with no outside prompting) you could be liable for charges.... At least that is what I get from it... Still they should have reworded the bill if this is the case...

it is still a felony in Montana to stage a dog fight...


#4    redhen

redhen

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,825 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Samsara

Posted 22 February 2013 - 05:41 PM

View PostTaun, on 22 February 2013 - 02:31 PM, said:

While it is not illegal to watch one it is illegal to have one...

Yes this sounds inconsistent no? It's because there is a gap in the law, which this bill would have filled.

Quote

The wording of the bill may have been vauge enough that if you happen upon two dogs fighting on their own (with no outside prompting) you could be liable for charges.... At least that is what I get from it... Still they should have reworded the bill if this is the case...

Not so. The wording of this one page bill is very clear, it applies to people

"WHO KNOWINGLY ATTENDS ANY EXHIBITION IN WHICH ANIMALS ARE FIGHTING FOR THE PURPOSE OF SPORT, AMUSEMENT, OR GAIN"

So if you walk down the street and see two dogs scrapping, you wouldn't be arrested.


Quote

it is still a felony in Montana to stage a dog fight...

Yes for the owners. But all those who watch this spectacle are within the existing law. This is very inconsistent.


#5    White Crane Feather

White Crane Feather

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 12,306 posts
  • Joined:12 Jul 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Potter: " is this real or is this in my mind?"

    Dumbledore: " Of course it's in your mind....., but that dosn't mean it's not real."

Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:05 PM

View Postredhen, on 22 February 2013 - 05:41 PM, said:



Yes this sounds inconsistent no? It's because there is a gap in the law, which this bill would have filled.



Not so. The wording of this one page bill is very clear, it applies to people

"WHO KNOWINGLY ATTENDS ANY EXHIBITION IN WHICH ANIMALS ARE FIGHTING FOR THE PURPOSE OF SPORT, AMUSEMENT, OR GAIN"

So if you walk down the street and see two dogs scrapping, you wouldn't be arrested.




Yes for the owners. But all those who watch this spectacle are within the existing law. This is very inconsistent.
Mehhhhhh  if you watch an illegal stage fight of humans, you don't get in trouble. I don't see how they would enforce such a thing on a populace. Not that I agree it should be happening, but there is a slippery slope. Illegal drag races, cage fights, kickboxing fights etc..etc... True the participants have a choice to compete or not, but arresting everyone is simply not practical and would cost a prosecuting body a tremendouse amount of money fighting everyone in court. Get the b******* that put on the show.

Edited by Seeker79, 22 February 2013 - 09:06 PM.

"I wish neither to possess, Nor to be possessed. I no longer covet paradise, more important, I no longer fear hell. The medicine for my suffering I had within me from the very beginning, but I did not take it. My ailment came from within myself, But I did not observe it until this moment. Now I see that I will never find the light.  Unless, like the candle, I am my own fuel, Consuming myself. "
Bruce Lee-

#6    Everdred

Everdred

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 192 posts
  • Joined:10 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:57 PM

Spectators aren't hurting the dogs.  We shouldn't be arresting people simply for what they view.  And certainly allowing up to six months in prison is cruel and unusual.  If it were restricted to only a moderate fine and no possibility of imprisonment, that would probably be much more palatable.


#7    redhen

redhen

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,825 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Samsara

Posted 22 February 2013 - 11:26 PM

View PostEverdred, on 22 February 2013 - 09:57 PM, said:

Spectators aren't hurting the dogs.

Do you think the owners would hold dog fights if there were no spectators? Most dog fights are held to make money, i.e. gambling. No spectators, no dog fights.

There are some people who will do absolutely anything to make money and dog fights are a source of income. The immorality of these fights is not universal. In Mongolia for example it is big business, but when Western companies like Heineken are used as sponsors they quickly distance themselves.


#8    GreenmansGod

GreenmansGod

    Bio-Electric sentient being.

  • Member
  • 10,365 posts
  • Joined:23 Jun 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Hurricane State

  • May the laughter ye give today return to thee 3 fold.

Posted 23 February 2013 - 12:26 AM

That is just shocking to me. It shows the politicians in Montana have know empathy at all. I would hate to be even a human in that state. I have no clue how anyone could watch something like that. Illegal drugs are illegal whether you are selling it or using it.  So it doesn't matter whether you are hosting it or watching it.

"The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible." Salman Rushdie




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users