Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * - - - 3 votes

1984, Brave New World, & The Fall of Mankind

1984 orwell huxley brave new world eden

  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

#1    prometheuslocke

prometheuslocke

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 245 posts
  • Joined:02 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 26 February 2013 - 06:31 PM

In 1917, George Orwell and Aldous Huxley met at Eton College. Huxley briefly taught Orwell, and neither cites this time period as having anything to do with their inspiration for their disutopic prophesies. Regardless, their meeting is no coincidence, they were chosen by a force to deliver a message, one that is much larger than each of their individual masterpieces individually. They are collective proof of a telepathic force which routinely alters the course of human events, using the very mechanism by which these prophetic works were delivered.

Taken as Biblical allegory, Eton has an awful strong semblance to Eden. Out of Eton, came two works of art, which describe the proverbial fall of man. I stumbled upon the 1917 meeting, and found it hugely significant because of what I was looking for. Almost six months ago, I was searching through our history looking for the mark of a mind control influence on humanity. The parameters for the force I was looking for were simple: it was a piece of technology, something that could alter the thoughts of humans once they came in contact with them at any one time at any one place. It did this by using quantum entanglement to "connect" to the mind, and once this connection was made it would never be severed regardless of distance or time. What I found was probably akin to falling off of a toilet bowl and drawing a Flux Capacitor.

At Trinity College, from Isaac Newton to James Clerk Maxwell to Neils Bohr; the secrets of the universe, modern physics were imparted to men over a near four hundred year period. The information that was imparted was especially profound to me, because it was the very science that would be required for the mind control machine to work. It was my belief at the time that this force required human intervention in either repairing it or increasing its reach. In order to accomplish this it slowly and methodically transferred advanced scientific knowledge into our civilization, so it could be used during the 20th century in order to create a sprawling infrastructure which would allow it to perform this "magic" not only on a localized scale, but across the globe. The fact that they all attended a school called Trinity was especially significant to me, as I had just traced the influence of this machine through our modern times, using religious experience and epiphany as a tracking method. It seemed to me that the force was signing the divine inspiration of modern quantum physics with Christian iconography. As an aside, the story of Newton's apple bears striking resemblance to the Eden story as well, and in my eyes is no coincidence. It could equally well be a parallel story, one designed to closely parallel the Eton descriptive works with a scientific explanation, instead of the effect, the cause. In my world of hidden meaning, it's almost hilarious that the apple hit him on the head. Receiving the knowledge of physics wasn't a choice, it was forced on us all.

In my search for truth hidden inside our own history, I was instead faced with something far more telling. Out of the 1917 connection at Eton, which epitomized exactly what I was searching for, came a prophesy which describes what I see in the world around me almost perfectly. Many people in the world today see mind control, they see it in the mass media, and in state distribution of narcotics. They see Brave New World almost as Huxley described it in the 1930's, well before these things were a glimmer of reality. A world where the people are apathetic to their loss of freedom because of an inundation of entertainment that makes the government's destruction of peace, liberty, transparency, and self-governance seem almost surreal.

At the same time, very few people see Orwell's vision as much more than allegory. Thought police, depopulation, doublethink, and machines capable of physically changing the thoughts of humans are thought of as nothing more than science fiction. These ideas though, came at a time well before there was any evidence that they were even physically possible. There is, now, a significant amount of evidence that these things have been thoroughly researched by our own government, and the possibility that they are being masked by the Brave New World mechanisms of control are more real than you think.

As far as population control, modern folklore related to the Illuminati has been discussing the idea of forced depopulation for decades. The Georgia Guidestones mention it specifically, as do the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Regardless of whether or not these things are hoaxes, or perhaps "set ups," many modern conspiracy theorists discuss the poisoning of our food with genetic modification, and the fluoridation of our water supply. It could be a coincidence, but there are so many more.

The truth behind Orwell's idea of state sponsored terrorism should be more than obvious to anyone looking at the war our government is currently engaged in. We have invaded at least three countries in order to root out and destroy a small faction of Islamic terrorists. This organization, however, is publicly known to have been funded by the CIA during the cold war... it is their creation, a weapon against Communism. At the same time, the countries which were invaded happen to have huge value to large multinational corporations and organized crime: they are huge sources of competition in the oil and narcotics markets, and these wars have done nothing but solidify the position of the elite in those businesses. Ironically enough, after there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and no Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan... there still is, and most likely always will be, a continuing U.S. Military presence.

The surveillance infrastructure in 1984 is all but a reality today. The NSA and related agencies have satellites covering the surface of the world, with real time imagery... that's obvious. Unconstitutional programs like Carnivore and Echelon have been completely ignored by the public at large in the last half decade, for what appears to be no apparent reason. Congress even attempted to legislate away the Fourth Amendment so they could legally be allowed to continue. None the less, they continue without any legal basis whatsoever. At the same time, legislation like the Patriot Act and the NDAA have gone through Congress, despite massive public outcry, with no check from the Supreme Court -- even though it's their job to invalidate laws which violate the Constitution. The banking records, phone calls, travel plans, and internet postings of honest and innocent Americans are now available for the government to see... no matter what. And still, we do nothing.

Huxley told us of a world of state sponsored drugging. After the pretty obvious use of the U.S. military to intervene in heroin trafficking, and the equally obvious use of federal resources in the Crack Cocaine epidemics and the Iran Contra scandal, it's hard to fathom an American that isn't aware of the CIA's involvement in not only international trafficking, but also domestic distribution. Gary Webb exposed it, and it cost him his career. Iran Contra should have stopped it, but instead showed the world that the CIA was willing to lie through its teeth to protect a revenue stream which allowed it to bypass Congress, and the People, in the funding of its black projects. What kinds of projects could they be working on...

As far as the thoughtpolice, MK-Ultra was exposed for the entire world to see, and since that time there have been numerous assassinations which have been linked to the use of the technology. Congress shut down the program in the early 70's after it was made public. Sure they did. Sirhan Sirhan used mind control as a defense at his trial, saying he believed he was a victim of a government intelligence operation related to Monarch. Mark David Chapman described not only the experience of being mind controlled, for a significant portion of his life, but also linked it to religion. Shortly thereafter, John Hinkley Jr. attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan, leaving his Vice President 'in control' of the White House. This particular person, happened to be a former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, and has been linked to the John F. Kennedy assassination. Hinkley also, has been linked to mind control.

In more recent history, people like John Norseen, and even the National Air and Space Administration have discussed using mind control and mind reading technology in public places, like airports, in order to thwart "terrorism." Norseen passed away shortly before he was to attend an ethics debate regarding the use of the technology. We've already established that terrorism is being used as a tool to control popular opinion and allow a new age of imperialistic behavior just quiet enough that the people (and the media) rarely speaks about it. It's also being used to invade the privacy of pretty much everyone on the planet... is it so much of a leap to think that maybe its more than just privacy that is being affected by the "war on terror?"

There are a growing number of Americans complaining of the use of mind control technology against them, however despite the reality that the technology has not only been researched, but perfected, they are ridiculed by the public and the psychiatric community as suffering from delusion. Psychiatry itself has taken very simple possibly effects of mind control, like synthetic telepathy, and made them a harbinger of mental illness. It's not much of a leap to realize that these things could be used as a weapon to discredit the testimony, or silence the dissenting opinion, of enemies of a state which is using mind control on a daily basis.

The world Orwell described in 1984 is not so far away from plausibility. In fact, it could be our reality today, and the only thing that would be required to keep every red blooded American from seeing it would be... the very technology which he described. Perhaps it is the apparent influence of the mechanisms behind Huxley's vision that keep the masses from actually seeing that Orwell's is just as close, and written all over the conspicuously public history of the CIA and NSA. Perhaps we live in a world today that is a combination of both visions, and there's a reason they were delivered to us with a link that clearly ties them together.


#2    StarMountainKid

StarMountainKid

    Cheese

  • Member
  • 4,298 posts
  • Joined:17 Feb 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Star Mountain, Corporate States of America

  • We have problems because we stray from what is innocent and pure.

Posted 26 February 2013 - 06:52 PM

Interesting post. What exactly is the mind control technology?

The acceptance of authority does not lead to intelligence.
A mind untouched by thought...the end of knowledge.
To see reality loose your opinions.

#3    prometheuslocke

prometheuslocke

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 245 posts
  • Joined:02 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 26 February 2013 - 07:17 PM

View PostStarMountainKid, on 26 February 2013 - 06:52 PM, said:

Interesting post. What exactly is the mind control technology?

A machine that uses quantum entanglement to somehow remotely trigger and suppress action potentials in neurons.  I imagine it probably has something to with interfering with the function of ion gated voltage channels.  

I believe there is significant public information available now that shows that charge is a property which is conferrable via entanglement.


#4    prometheuslocke

prometheuslocke

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 245 posts
  • Joined:02 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 26 February 2013 - 07:28 PM

View Postprometheuslocke, on 26 February 2013 - 07:17 PM, said:

A machine that uses quantum entanglement to somehow remotely trigger and suppress action potentials in neurons.  I imagine it probably has something to with interfering with the function of ion gated voltage channels.  

I believe there is significant public information available now that shows that charge is a property which is conferrable via entanglement.

Actually to better answer your question, I was looking for the Ark of the Covenant.


#5    cladking

cladking

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Member
  • 8,042 posts
  • Joined:06 Nov 2006
  • Location:Indiana

  • Tempus fugit.

Posted 26 February 2013 - 07:43 PM

There is some hand at work in the way events unfold.  Or at the least we can say
that some consciousness appears to drive large swaths of what happens everday
from the biggest events to the mundane.  Most people see this as divine but it seems
far more like some sort of "magic".

There's a science fiction story by Kurt Vonnegut (...so it goes) that portrays this force
as the actions of an alien who is crash landed on Saturn's Titan who can affect the thoughts
of man to develop and bring him the part needed to repair his craft.  It requires 45000
years but he has the time to wait.

While it might be possible even now to affect the brain through some sort of field it seems
highly dubious to me that it's possible to directly affect thought since the action of the brain
is not understood yet.  We still mistakingly believe that the mind is in the brain so how can
we affect the mind?  I don't believe any sort of thought control is yet possible.  Thought sup-
pression, probably...

People are naturally capable of double think because we hold our beliefs so closely.  We
are blind to things that don't fit our expectations and if our faces are rubbed in the facts we
make excuses for why the facts are inconsistent.  People are born many of their beliefs or
soon after have them spoon fed to them.

I believe this phenomena of allowing others to do our thinking is getting far worse in modern
times because we are no longer responsible for what we do nor the results of our actions
but only for our beliefs.  Schools have utterly failed but one of the things they still try to teach
any student who has two brain cells to rub together is that thinking will get you nowhere be-
cause the experts are necessarily right.

I've seen these meetings and coincidences even first hand, I believe.  I don't know what's caus-
ing such things but humabn history is lousy with people trying to explain it.  Personally I sus-
pect some of it is caused by the nature of language and the way it has changed but this mostly
applies only to the freakish occurances of apt names historical figures.

Men fear the pyramid, time fears man.

#6    prometheuslocke

prometheuslocke

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 245 posts
  • Joined:02 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 26 February 2013 - 07:54 PM

View Postcladking, on 26 February 2013 - 07:43 PM, said:


While it might be possible even now to affect the brain through some sort of field it seems
highly dubious to me that it's possible to directly affect thought since the action of the brain
is not understood yet.  We still mistakingly believe that the mind is in the brain so how can
we affect the mind?  I don't believe any sort of thought control is yet possible.  Thought sup-
pression, probably...


Check out John Norseen and Duncan Laurie:

http://www.usnews.co...hive_033992.htm
http://www.duncanlau...flexive_control


#7    Harte

Harte

    Supremely Educated Knower of Everything in Existence

  • Member
  • 9,472 posts
  • Joined:06 Aug 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Memphis

  • Skeptic

Posted 26 February 2013 - 09:15 PM

Reading your links, I wonder why you brought entanglement into this?

Just for the flash?

Your links posit the possibility of creating a thought is someone else's mind via electromagnetics.

Like most others on the internet, your ignorance of quantum theory is astounding, considering you want to try and implicate it in this fashion.

It's obvious to thinking people, then, that you are full of crap; because you claim a thing about entanglement that is impossible with entanglement, and link to pages that support the same thing you claim, only wirth E-M fields and no entanglement.

Harte

I've consulted all the sages I could find in yellow pages but there aren't many of them. - The Alan Parsons Project
Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do so. - Bertrand Russell
Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong. - Thomas Jefferson
Giorgio's dying Ancient Aliens internet forum

#8    prometheuslocke

prometheuslocke

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 245 posts
  • Joined:02 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:28 PM

View PostHarte, on 26 February 2013 - 09:15 PM, said:

Reading your links, I wonder why you brought entanglement into this?

Just for the flash?

Your links posit the possibility of creating a thought is someone else's mind via electromagnetics.

Like most others on the internet, your ignorance of quantum theory is astounding, considering you want to try and implicate it in this fashion.

It's obvious to thinking people, then, that you are full of crap; because you claim a thing about entanglement that is impossible with entanglement, and link to pages that support the same thing you claim, only wirth E-M fields and no entanglement.

Harte

Explain why it is impossible with entanglement, using hard facts.  You will not be able to.

The links are the cryptic loose lips of a government contract researcher (who arguably died for speaking), to think that he would be telling (or even knowing) the whole truth is ignorance.

Wonderful logic, to ignore an entire argument because you do not understand one detail.  That's all it is, your personal lack of understanding of the true nature of entanglement.

Let me lead you towards the truth:

The "no-communication theorum" is pure dribble, which comes to its final conclusion based on a 'statistical improbability.'

To answer your question, I have had enough first hand experience with the technology to

1) send me on this quest to find its source.
2) personally witness that electromagnetic shielding does not interfere with it.

Edited by prometheuslocke, 26 February 2013 - 11:30 PM.


#9    prometheuslocke

prometheuslocke

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 245 posts
  • Joined:02 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 27 February 2013 - 04:42 AM

Frankly it's also reinforced by Bohr's presence at Trinity.  The path I followed to get there leads to Germany afterwords, at the same time Einstein, Heisenberg, and Kaluza were working on quantum mechanics also.

Oh, and the most horrendous and spectacular display of mind control in history, the complete idiocy of Nazi Germany.

Edited by prometheuslocke, 27 February 2013 - 04:43 AM.


#10    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 11,434 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queensland, Australia.

Posted 27 February 2013 - 05:09 AM

as I understood it, to effect a change at the quantum level, you needed to interact ith the object you want to influence, in order to interact/control a  rain you eed to have gotten in there and established a quantum linkage.  You can't kust point a controller at someone and control them without the direct interaction.

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#11    Harte

Harte

    Supremely Educated Knower of Everything in Existence

  • Member
  • 9,472 posts
  • Joined:06 Aug 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Memphis

  • Skeptic

Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:03 PM

View Postprometheuslocke, on 26 February 2013 - 11:28 PM, said:

Explain why it is impossible with entanglement, using hard facts.  You will not be able to.
It is impossible to send any information whatsoever through any variation of entanglement.

The information involved is transferred from one particle to the other during the entanglement, not afterward, though it may appear otherwise.

That is why.

The statements above are factual.  Do you know enough about the matrix mathematics involved for me to describe what happens in more precise terms?  Obviously not, or you wouldn't have made the kind of inane statement you did.

Harte

I've consulted all the sages I could find in yellow pages but there aren't many of them. - The Alan Parsons Project
Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do so. - Bertrand Russell
Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong. - Thomas Jefferson
Giorgio's dying Ancient Aliens internet forum

#12    Rlyeh

Rlyeh

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,346 posts
  • Joined:01 Jan 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The sixth circle

  • Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Posted 28 February 2013 - 03:54 AM

View Postprometheuslocke, on 26 February 2013 - 07:17 PM, said:

A machine that uses quantum entanglement to somehow remotely trigger and suppress action potentials in neurons.  I imagine it probably has something to with interfering with the function of ion gated voltage channels.  

I believe there is significant public information available now that shows that charge is a property which is conferrable via entanglement.
In other words something you've made up. Entangled systems are fragile, using it to control someone's mind is idiotic and counterproductive.

It's clear there is no mind control machine, just a delusional individual.


#13    jaylemurph

jaylemurph

    Lector Historiae

  • Member
  • 8,955 posts
  • Joined:02 Nov 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle, WA

  • "You can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make him think." Dorothy Parker

Posted 28 February 2013 - 04:34 AM

View Postprometheuslocke, on 26 February 2013 - 06:31 PM, said:

Taken as Biblical allegory, Eton has an awful strong semblance to Eden.

Hunh. I missed all the buggery in the Biblical Eden, then.

From the latest series of Downton Abbey: "I mean, if I’d shouted blue murder every time someone tried to kiss me at Eton, I’d have gone hoarse in a month”

--Jaylemurph

Edited by jaylemurph, 28 February 2013 - 04:35 AM.

"... amongst the most obstinate of our opinions may be classed those which derive from discussions in which we affect to search for the truth, while in reality we are only fortifying prejudice."     -- James Fenimore Cooper, The Pathfinder

Posted Image

Deeply venial

#14    The_Spartan

The_Spartan

    Spartan Forever!!!!

  • Member
  • 3,736 posts
  • Joined:31 Mar 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • Gravity is Arbitrary!!

Posted 28 February 2013 - 12:02 PM

and pray do tell me....how is the original post and its essence..ancient mystetry-ish or alternative history-ish?

"Wise men, when in doubt whether to speak or to keep quiet, give themselves the benefit of the doubt, and remain silent.-Napoleon Hill

Follow my stupid posts on Tumblr at Azrael's Ramblings

#15    TheSearcher

TheSearcher

    Coffee expert extraordinair

  • Member
  • 3,845 posts
  • Joined:16 Jun 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 28 February 2013 - 03:33 PM

It's not, it's as far as I can tell just some conspiracy theory tosh and should be moved to another part of the forum.



Edit : aaaaaaand the typo king is back .....

Edited by TheSearcher, 28 February 2013 - 03:34 PM.

It is only the ignorant who despise education.
Publilius Syrus.

So god made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom?!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users