I think that is a rash conclusion and appeals to a simplistic view of the world.
I encourage you to research Cass Sustein, Soros, google exectives, and their connections to wikileaks.
edmonds and ellesberg don't need and never used wikileaks, i suspect the manning story is also a pysop.
I have heard of several, and contributed to some organization related to Soros. I admire his working against prohibition.
I understand and accept that people do have agendas. Some are good and some are bad. It could be that Assange is part of some agenda. If he is, I admire the agenda.