Then provide the evidence to show that science has verified it. I am assuming you are using the word 'recorded' to mean they have recorded studies into it but that doesn't mean they proved anything. If it did then show us that.
So you are saying the Russians have not verified it as a scientific fact?
Anyway when I quickly look it up I find this in regards to obe and science.
"The accepted explanation for the OBE in the fields of cognitive science and psychology is that the OBE is a hallucinatory construct that arises from different psychological factors. The scientific community consider the OBE to be an experience from a mental state, like a dream or an altered state of consciousness without recourse to the paranormal"
Found here http://en.wikipedia....body_experience
So in an obe(or remote viewing)you claim you can see things as accurately and as real as a military drone but it has little military application. I'm not sure how that works exactly. You'd think it would be a wonderful for spying.
Anyway this is what I found in regards to remote viewing.
" Scientific studies have been conducted; some earlier, less sophisticated experiments produced positive results but they had invalidating flaws, and none of the newer experiments had positive results when under properly controlled conditions. The scientific community rejects remote viewing due to the absence of an evidence base, the lack of a theory which would explain remote viewing, and the lack of experimental techniques which can provide reliably positive results. It is also considered a pseudoscience.["
Found here... http://en.wikipedia..../Remote_viewing
So again all I read is fluff as if it's facts.