Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 2 votes

Nibiru: the imaginary planet


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1    UM-Bot

UM-Bot

    News, media and articles

  • 6,196 posts
  • Joined:21 Mar 2001
  • Gender:Male

  • Beep Boop

Posted 14 March 2013 - 12:33 PM

<strong class='bbc'>Image credit: NASA</strong>
Image credit: NASA
William B Stoecker: Those of us who research and write about fringe topics like UFOs, the paranormal, and lost civilizations like to think that the so-called "skeptics" who accept conventional views on everything without question are actually true believers in the status quo, and those of us on the fringe, who question conventional ideas, are the true skeptics. But if we are truly skeptical, we must also question and feel free to criticize fringe beliefs that do not seem to be based on facts or logic. An example would be the books of Zechariah Sitchin. Sitchin (7/11/1920-10/9/2010) was an economist, not an archaeologist, and most certainly not an astronomer. He taught himself to read ancient Sumerian, studied Sumerian myths, and constructed an elaborate theory devoid of logic or any real factual foundation.

Posted Image View: Full Article

This is an official comment thread for a main site news story, article or video.
Please keep comments civil and on topic.
Thank you.

#2    Gold Star

Gold Star

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 57 posts
  • Joined:10 Oct 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 14 March 2013 - 05:21 PM

Inside Sitchin's inanities is a central core of truth - the visitation of ET's in humanity's past. Likewise, Velikovsky, despite his impossibile notions, pointed the way to  the non-uniformitarian viewpoint and the influence of astronomical events on human culture. Establishing an insidious truth may require a provisional, temporary myth to prepare the ground for it. Is it just a coincidence that Sitchin, Velikovsky, Marx, Freud, etc., were Jewish in origin? I don't think so.


#3    keithisco

keithisco

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,510 posts
  • Joined:06 May 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southampton, Blighty!

Posted 14 March 2013 - 06:03 PM

 Gold Star, on 14 March 2013 - 05:21 PM, said:

Inside Sitchin's inanities is a central core of truth - the visitation of ET's in humanity's past. Likewise, Velikovsky, despite his impossibile notions, pointed the way to  the non-uniformitarian viewpoint and the influence of astronomical events on human culture. Establishing an insidious truth may require a provisional, temporary myth to prepare the ground for it. Is it just a coincidence that Sitchin, Velikovsky, Marx, Freud, etc., were Jewish in origin? I don't think so.

Considering that Marx denounced his Jewish heritage to become a Protestant then certainly one of your Pillars holds no Truth.

The article by Mr Stoecker however is well considered, and exposes some of the more ridiculous precepts behind "Nibiru".


#4    OverSword

OverSword

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 15,295 posts
  • Joined:16 Oct 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle WA USA

  • I love chocolate

Posted 14 March 2013 - 10:13 PM

I work with a fan of Sitchin, and when he starts referencing his interpretation of sumerian legends as historical fact I just smile and nod.


#5    cultanorak

cultanorak

    Alien Embryo

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 103 posts
  • Joined:07 Jul 2010
  • Gender:Male

  • I imagine you have orders to destroy me?

Posted 15 March 2013 - 08:55 PM

People shouldn't be to quick to dismiss Nibiru because even though the theory has no support from the scientific establishment (which is no indicator that it does not exist in my mind) similar hypothesis concerning a huge undetected planetary body or dwarf star companion to our own Sun have been put forward in the 'Tyche' and 'Nemesis' hypothesis.

http://en.wikipedia....thetical_planet)

http://en.wikipedia....pothetical_star)

I personally like to think that Nibiru is out there in some sense.


#6    Harte

Harte

    Supremely Educated Knower of Everything in Existence

  • Member
  • 10,582 posts
  • Joined:06 Aug 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Memphis

  • Skeptic

Posted 16 March 2013 - 05:08 AM

*
POPULAR

One of Stoecker's better attempts, this article isn't filled to the brim with fatally idiotic statements like most of Stoecker's ramblings I've bothered to read.

However, we still must suffer through typical Stoeckerisms:

Quote

In fact, there is no hard evidence that Homo erectus was a different species ancestral to modern Man; it is more likely that they were fully human and were merely a different race rather than a different species. I have discussed this at some length in an article in Atlantis Rising magazine. Homo erectus is well over a million years old, and researchers Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson have uncovered massive evidence that people like us were alive on this Earth at least one or two million years ago, and probably five or ten million years before the present. There is even some evidence for still earlier dates.

Erectus is undoubtedly not the same species as Sapiens.

Cremo and his ilk have "discovered" no evidence whatsoever concerning Homo Sapiens existing millions of years ago.

Stoecker is, thankfully, correct about Sitchin except in one particular.  Sitchin never "taught himself" cuneiform.  Sitchin never learned to read cuneiform.  If you read his books, you'll find no evidence of him making this claim.  Sitchin used established translations by actual experts - such as Samuel Kramer - and then invented his own "interpretations" of individual words in these translations to alter the meanings of sentences so that they would fit his business plan.

Harte

I've consulted all the sages I could find in yellow pages but there aren't many of them. - The Alan Parsons Project
Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do so. - Bertrand Russell
Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong. - Thomas Jefferson
Anybody like Coleridge?

#7    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 13,082 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queensland, Australia.

Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:38 PM

 Gold Star, on 14 March 2013 - 05:21 PM, said:

Inside Sitchin's inanities is a central core of truth - the visitation of ET's in humanity's past.
And your evidence is ....

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#8    Eternal.Quest.4.Truth

Eternal.Quest.4.Truth

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Joined:16 Mar 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:25 AM

I am not going to say that Zecharia Sitchin's work is fact, nor do I offer any other explanation for our origins. However, I will say that you as a self-described "open-minded skeptic", who does nautomatically accept mainstream science and/or archeology answers/theories as truth


#9    Bonecrusher

Bonecrusher

    Facebook Fiend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,113 posts
  • Joined:25 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Middleton,Greater Manchester,UK

  • Your blood's worth bottling!

Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:04 AM

 yearofthehater, on 15 March 2013 - 08:55 PM, said:

People shouldn't be to quick to dismiss Nibiru because even though the theory has no support from the scientific establishment (which is no indicator that it does not exist in my mind) similar hypothesis concerning a huge undetected planetary body or dwarf star companion to our own Sun have been put forward in the 'Tyche' and 'Nemesis' hypothesis.

http://en.wikipedia....thetical_planet)

http://en.wikipedia....pothetical_star)

I personally like to think that Nibiru is out there in some sense.
It's there in some sense but it's not in some retrograde orbit around the Sun.Besides Niburu is reputed to be very big.So if it's really big it's bound to be a gas giant.And this is supposed to be the home of the Annuraki. So how do a supposedly humanoid race build dwellings on hydrogen,methane and helium gas?Do their buildings float in the sky?Or do they live permantly in spaceships?And  because Niburu's a bottomless void of gas how do they get the essential ores to harnass power and build their structures if they are so technologically advanced?It's orbit takes it to the farthest reaches of space.The last time I checked Mercury,Mars,Earth and Venus are not beyond the Oort Cloud.They have got plenty of asteroids at their disposal but Iridium can get a little bit tedious after a time.So the structures to support life are not present to support a planet with an eccentric orbit.Even if it was a rocky planet it's still going to be very tricky.

And besides how can Marduk be in two places at the same time?Because they can't be both a Sumerian god and a rogue planet.Something's got to give.However Sitchin is living in cloud- cuckoo land anyway.Not even Van Daniken went as far as that.

Edited by G Donnelly, 17 March 2013 - 09:56 AM.

Swindon Town:  Division Two Champions 2011-12.
Proud member of Macdonald's Red Army since 1989.
Up the Robins!

#10    Norbert the Incredible

Norbert the Incredible

    They knew too much about flying saucers!

  • Member
  • 27,542 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Ministry of Love

  • Vampires are people too.

Posted 18 March 2013 - 09:55 AM

 Wearer of Hats, on 16 March 2013 - 10:38 PM, said:

And your evidence is ....
Vitrification!

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


:cat:


#11    Iron_Lotus

Iron_Lotus

    Happy

  • Member
  • 4,499 posts
  • Joined:02 Jul 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 18 March 2013 - 09:42 PM

is it just me or does a thread about this fake planet show up every couple of months?

"Good lord, what is happening in there?!" ................."Aurora Borealis?"

"A...Aurora Borealis?! At this time of year?!? At this time of day!?!  In this part of the country!? Localized entirely within your kitchen!?!"   ...."Yes!"

#12    psyche101

psyche101

    The Customer.

  • Member
  • 35,143 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 18 March 2013 - 11:21 PM

Quote

In fact, the Bible is essentially correct; there was a global flood giving rise to the Biblical legend and the legend of Atlantis.

Global flood? And that gave rise to the legend of Atlantis? What about Plato and Donnelly?

Wut?

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#13    psyche101

psyche101

    The Customer.

  • Member
  • 35,143 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 18 March 2013 - 11:27 PM

 Eternal.Quest.4.Truth, on 17 March 2013 - 08:25 AM, said:

I am not going to say that Zecharia Sitchin's work is fact, nor do I offer any other explanation for our origins. However, I will say that you as a self-described "open-minded skeptic", who does nautomatically accept mainstream science and/or archeology answers/theories as truth

Are you saying because you have not seen it it might be true??

Mainstream has a couple of majors on it's side, like fossils. I can actually donk you on the head with proof, and for space, you do not even have to buy a telescope, you can book time at your local observatory. The claim is so full of obvious holes.

I was watching an interesting doco on the British Space race last night, some numpty on an old TV show wearing blackout goggles pretended to speak for Venusians and Martians. He looked a total idiot, and as we now know, full of it too. I wonder how people like that get enough exposure to actually get that much attention? Who would be dim enough to believe stuff like that?

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users