My first interpretation of what Boeing is proposing is that it is insufficient, does not address the core problems, and that , during an APU failure then the Battery back - up (28 - 32Vdc) does not provide a robust mitigation.
In terms of Functional Safety then I remain highly sceptical of their proposals with the real potential for Catastrophic consequences in the above scenario...
Read more (thanks to The New York Times) http://www.nytimes.c...r-787.html?_r=0
Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.
Boeing Discloses Fixes for Lithium-Ion...
No replies to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users