My first interpretation of what Boeing is proposing is that it is insufficient, does not address the core problems, and that , during an APU failure then the Battery back - up (28 - 32Vdc) does not provide a robust mitigation.
In terms of Functional Safety then I remain highly sceptical of their proposals with the real potential for Catastrophic consequences in the above scenario...
Read more (thanks to The New York Times) http://www.nytimes.c...r-787.html?_r=0
0
Boeing Discloses Fixes for Lithium-Ion...
Batteries in troubled 787
Started by keithisco , Mar 18 2013 08:56 PM
Started by keithisco , Mar 18 2013 08:56 PM
No replies to this topic
#1
keithisco
-
- Member
-
- 4,448 posts
Alien Abducter
- Joined:06 May 2007
- Gender:Male
- Location:Rincon de Loix, Benidorm
Posted 18 March 2013 - 08:56 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
