Was the Death Star's destruction an inside job...
0
Death Star's Destruction - an inside job?
Started by
DingoLingo
, Mar 19 2013 10:35 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
DingoLingo
-
- Member
-
- 825 posts
Paranormal Investigator
- Joined:05 Jul 2011
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:35 PM
#2
krypter3
-
- Member
-
- 233 posts
Ectoplasmic Residue
- Joined:10 Feb 2013
- Gender:Male
- Location:Australia
-
“My spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling but it Wobbles, and the letters get in the wrong places.” A.A Milne
Posted 19 March 2013 - 11:18 PM
......funniest thing I've watched this week.
TBA
#3
Esoteric Toad
-
- Member
-
- 626 posts
Astral Projection
- Joined:04 Jul 2007
- Gender:Male
- Location:Florida
-
Where does one get certified as an "Ancient Astronaut Theorist" or "Cryptozoologist?"
Posted 19 March 2013 - 11:48 PM
Epic! 
"We...we've got lumps of it 'round the ba...ck."
#4
Czero 101
-
- Member
-
- 4,621 posts
Alien Abducter
- Joined:24 Dec 2007
- Gender:Male
- Location:Vancouver, BC
-
We are all made of thermonuclear waste material
Posted 20 March 2013 - 12:52 AM
"Thinking is critical, because sense is not common..." - GreaterSapien
"Enquiring and doubting the "official story" are also good things .... However when these doubts require you to ignore the evidence, to dishonestly cherry pick evidence and claim it supports your case when it doesn't, when you operate a double standard; demanding proof of that which is already proven whilst making unsupported statements and personal opinions to back your own case and when you deny the truth simply because it IS the official story then you are no longer acting in a rational way. This is not the behaviour of a "different thinker", this is the behaviour of a "believer" who chooses not to rationally think about the evidence at all." - Waspie Dwarf
"Enquiring and doubting the "official story" are also good things .... However when these doubts require you to ignore the evidence, to dishonestly cherry pick evidence and claim it supports your case when it doesn't, when you operate a double standard; demanding proof of that which is already proven whilst making unsupported statements and personal opinions to back your own case and when you deny the truth simply because it IS the official story then you are no longer acting in a rational way. This is not the behaviour of a "different thinker", this is the behaviour of a "believer" who chooses not to rationally think about the evidence at all." - Waspie Dwarf
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
