Point is, claiming a nuke was used to bring down the towers is an extraordinary claim. To prove it, you must provide extraordinary evidence.
To start, you can first provide where such nukes were located to show the collapse we saw. Then explain how the perpetrators were 100% sure collapse initiation would happen the way it did.
The evidence is not really extraordinary RB. It's quite ordinary, if one studies nuclear physics and such, as Taylor Wilson does. If your curious and analytical mind were to ACTUALLY take the time to read Prager's book, you would discover that the evidence is abundant.
It's just that Brian Williams and Diane Sawyer don't talk about it. Much of it has been suppressed, or at least ignored.
The USGS analysis of the dust, and 2 girders, show without question that nuclear fission took place at WTC that day. The molten metal in the bowels of the buildings was actually a miniaturized version of the China Syndrome as it applies to runaway nuclear reactors.