Why do you think that is the case? Do you not think his persistance in telling people to throw away textbooks, outright refusal to accept validated fact in favour of some whacky idea, and insistance on keeping a well explained subject alive with unfounded fringe musings time, and time, and time again, which is obviously annoying people who hear the same over and over again non stop, and unfounded, is admirable, and should be respected????????????
This thread was specifically created to avoid that garbology, and it was requested that the stone nonsense go away, as it has been explained umpteen times yet the same idiotic questions surface again. I am truly perplexed, could you explain the value in regurgitating unfounded nonsense and calling it a solution when only one person is interested in pursuing that dim notion?
Is there even an AA theory? One thing for sure it is NOT scientific theory, which is hardly the same thing, and illustrates the major difference as to how AA is allowed to borrow the term for the thread title.
Melting rocks to a maleable state? Seriously? There is such thing as a fair go, and that has been well and truly worn out.