Terror on the Tube – Feb 26, 2013
I believe the BBC, who are directly funded by the licence fee, are furthering the purposes of terrorism and I have incontrovertible evidence to this effect. I do not use this word lightly given where I am’ Tony Rooke
The Magistrate’s decision has to be seen in the context of Tony Rooke amassing a team of witnesses who had submitted witness statements and evidence to the court prior to yesterday’s hearing. These witnesses came from a variety of backgrounds and composed of the following:
· Ian Henshall – Reinvestigate 9/11 and author
· Peter Drew – activist against BBC broadcasting standards
· Ray Savage – former Police Officer with experience in Counter Terrorism and Regional Intelligence Units
· Niels Harrit – Scientist from Copenhagen
· Adrian Mallett – Firefighter and Engineer
· Tony Farrell – former Principal Intelligence Analyst for South Yorkshire Police
A British 911 court Hearing (by NK)
Tony used the Jane Stanley case in his defence. Remember her? On 9/11, she was the BBC’s pre-cognitive reporter in New York. In the words of the Daily Mail, in its report of the trial, ” the BBC allegedly reported that World Trade Centre 7 had fallen 20 minutes before it did.”
Advance News from the BBC The BBC reported that World Trade Centre building 7 had collapsed, at 21.54 GMT on September 11th. The BBC’s reporter Jane Stanley was in New York giving this on the spot report – with WTC-7 right behind her in the picture still standing! The video of her report faded out five minutes before its actual collapse! It collapsed at 22.20 GMT. Tony Rooke rightly sees this as DIRECT COMPLICITY IN AN ACT OF TERROR.
FoxNews also reported the collapse of WTC-7 before it happened:
…we are getting word from New York that another building has collapsed and we understand this is a 47 story building … is that smoke coming from this third collapse?
Take a look at that right hand of the screen.
It’s going down right now.
Edited by Scorpius, 03 April 2013 - 04:16 PM.