Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Time Traveller Mystery Solved!


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1    pitchp

pitchp

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 210 posts
  • Joined:20 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male

  • "I go when I want to go. To prolong life would be tasteless"
    Albert Einstein

Posted 07 April 2013 - 04:37 AM

This topic has been discussed here and around the world. It's about a young lady using a mobile phone from the past. Now the secret has finally been revealed!

Posted Image

http://news.ninemsn....aveller-mystery

https://www.youtube....h?v=iasKNUhDc_w

The mystery of a young woman who appears to talk on a mobile phone in video footage from the 1930s may have been solved after a relative of the so-called 'time traveller' came forward.

"The truth is out there. We are all searching for it."
   PitchP

#2    Emma_Acid

Emma_Acid

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,484 posts
  • Joined:29 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

  • Godspeed MID

Posted 07 April 2013 - 08:06 AM

That's all very nice but there was nothing to solve. A mobile phone taken to a time when there were no mobiles simply wouldn't work. The fact that this has to be "solved" says a lot about both the public's and the media's critical thinking functions.

"Science is the least subjective form of deduction" ~ A. Mulder

#3    AsteroidX

AsteroidX

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,570 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Free America

  • it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Posted 07 April 2013 - 09:03 AM

That would be an awful small "short wave radio". Wireless phones were not that small till well into the early '90's. I guess that tech moved along slowly.

Not saying thats an impossible story but the device shes using IMO would need to be larger for the timeperiod. But we do know they had short wave in WW2. But they were Backpack sized.


#4    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 07 April 2013 - 01:23 PM

Whatever it was why did it have to be from the future? People hold up stuff to thir head/ears all the time.

Maybe she was holding a small bag/box while scratcing her cheek?

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins

#5    TheSearcher

TheSearcher

    Coffee expert extraordinair

  • Member
  • 3,845 posts
  • Joined:16 Jun 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium

Posted 08 April 2013 - 11:21 AM

View PostDBunker, on 07 April 2013 - 01:23 PM, said:

Whatever it was why did it have to be from the future? People hold up stuff to thir head/ears all the time.

Maybe she was holding a small bag/box while scratching her cheek?

Which seems to be the most likely argument to be honest.

It is only the ignorant who despise education.
Publilius Syrus.

So god made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom?!

#6    Grey14

Grey14

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 773 posts
  • Joined:09 Oct 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Heart of America

Posted 08 April 2013 - 05:17 PM

No way this is true. Not to be rude but lets face it they would not have women testing something this advanced for that time period. It just wouldn't happen. And that not even talking about the size aspect. Heck radios in that time period were alot bigger than that let alone something to transmit as well.

"The only thing Needed for the Truimph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

#7    johnny blue eyes

johnny blue eyes

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 79 posts
  • Joined:08 Dec 2010

Posted 08 April 2013 - 08:34 PM

Looks like shes holding her jacket over her shoulder? Or just holding her hair?


#8    Professor Buzzkill

Professor Buzzkill

    Integrity is all we have

  • Member
  • 2,583 posts
  • Joined:20 Oct 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:White Cloud

Posted 08 April 2013 - 08:43 PM

The article clearly states she is using a "wireless" phone as part of a test involving 5 workers. The video looks like she is using a phone. But all this from a unverified source. People should use the links


#9    Harlequin Dreamer

Harlequin Dreamer

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 306 posts
  • Joined:12 Jul 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Anywhere & Everywhere

  • Dear Optimist,Pessimist,and Realist, While you guys are busy arguing about a glass of water, I drank it. Sincerely the Opportunist.

Posted 08 April 2013 - 09:38 PM

Its a purse and if you look the woman in front of her has one also.   :yes:


#10    _Only

_Only

  • Member
  • 6,525 posts
  • Joined:24 Oct 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northern California

  • Did you ever grow anything in the garden of your mind? You can grow ideas, in the garden of your mind. - Mr. Rogers

Posted 17 June 2013 - 06:59 AM

View PostEmma_Acid, on 07 April 2013 - 08:06 AM, said:

That's all very nice but there was nothing to solve. A mobile phone taken to a time when there were no mobiles simply wouldn't work. The fact that this has to be "solved" says a lot about both the public's and the media's critical thinking functions.

Or it could say the same of your capacity for imagination. There are hypothetical reasons for a woman looking like that to have a cell phone at that moment in time with the right imagination. Example: she could have been a time traveler seeing if the device was any good, checking her voice mail, using it in some way cell phones will be used in the future that we don't have the technology for yet, etc, etc.

A more creative fun hypothetical is that she was a time traveler, and for some reason knew that a photo would be taken at this exact location at this exact time, and chose to make the pose, tongue firmly planted in cheek.

To assume that the only reason some thing would be plastered to her ear is to make a call using non existent service could say a bit about one's creative thinking function.

I love to make mashups! Click here to hear!
I also love taking pictures! Click here to see!
I love to play drums, too! Whatever you do, don't click here!

#11    Realm

Realm

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,038 posts
  • Joined:29 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere in our spiral galaxy

  • "The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination."
    Albert Einstein

Posted 17 June 2013 - 07:21 AM

I'm positive that if all the pictures from the year 1940, to say 1860 could be seen, there would be millions of photos of people holding things (seemingly) to their ear in a time of no hand held radios, or cell phones, or Star Trek communicators. So the only logical conclusion would be they are time travelers. :rolleyes:

Edited by Realm, 17 June 2013 - 07:23 AM.


#12    Jacques Terreur

Jacques Terreur

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,144 posts
  • Joined:07 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AREA 69

Posted 17 June 2013 - 07:21 AM

why go with "coincidental shot" with this picture when you can fabricate a time traveller tale??

here, a top secret photo that proves Elizabeth the 2nd is actually a time travelling robot from the future. This statement is clearly proven by this snapshot where she's seen activating her secret transmitting device:

Posted Image

Q.E.D.

I like to take long beach walks in the sunset with my wife until
the LSD wears off and i realize that i am dragging a stolen Mannequin over a LIDL parking lot.

#13    scowl

scowl

    Government Agent

  • Closed
  • 4,111 posts
  • Joined:17 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 17 June 2013 - 03:52 PM

This one isn't as good as the Chaplin footage. If I remember right, in that one a woman takes something out of a bag and puts it up to her ear just like someone would answer a cell phone these days. But that doesn't mean it was a cell phone of course. She could have pulled out a watch, seen it was wrong, and held it up to her ear to check if it was ticking. Just like in this one, the thing is just a black blob which we only see for a second or two and no one around them seems surprised that someone is talking on a phone from the future.


#14    Sakari

Sakari

    tohi

  • Member
  • 12,157 posts
  • Joined:16 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Safford, Arizona...My heart and soul are still on the Oregon Coast.

  • Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Posted 17 June 2013 - 05:20 PM

People did not hold things up to their heads in the 1930's...

That was un heard of then.

People did not start holding things up to their heads until the 1950's, everyone knows this.

Our Wolf's Memorial Page

http://petsupports.com/a04/sakari.htm


#15    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 17 June 2013 - 09:45 PM

Yes, where is that Chaplin "cell phone" picture..... taken from a film if Im not mistaken.

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users