Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

"Alien Structures on the Moon"

aliens moon buildings dark side

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
351 replies to this topic

#331    psyche101

psyche101

    The Customer.

  • Member
  • 38,390 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 15 May 2013 - 03:21 AM

View PostSmirnov, on 14 May 2013 - 12:25 PM, said:

Alex said there is a war going on outside our solar system between Pleiadians and the bad Greys (the type of Greys that reportedly are slaves to serve Draconian Reptilians), and this is backed up by another Andromedan contactee 'Tolec' who also mention about the war againts these bad aliens, and this is again backed up by Michael Prince former super soldier assassin in SS and MI-6 U.K., who also confirm the against the hostile ET's,  http://www.examiner....ity-has-started

So the supernovas we see are really an intergalactic war are they?

LOL.

The movie "Paul" was more realistic than this.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#332    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 19,033 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Planet TEXAS

Posted 15 May 2013 - 03:41 AM

ANd another one bite the Dust !,And Another,one& Another one ! :whistle:
Freddie Still Rocks this Planet !

This is a Work in Progress!

#333    s33ker

s33ker

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 562 posts
  • Joined:21 Aug 2012
  • Location:Australia

  • Believe anything until proven otherwise, otherwise believe nothing until proven.

Posted 15 May 2013 - 03:56 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 15 May 2013 - 03:14 AM, said:

People who ask politely are now knocked down at all. Those who burst in full of bluster and unsubstantiated rubbish insisting those who do not agree with them are closed minded will get a hard time and will be asked to prove that which they claim is true. Why should it be any other way?

Moon cities are the silliest claim of the lot. You can go to the moon with a Telescope. They are not there.

Are you serious !
No moon cities !
Well I'm off then , over to the Big Foot thread.
Cheerio.


#334    psyche101

psyche101

    The Customer.

  • Member
  • 38,390 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 15 May 2013 - 03:59 AM

View Posts33ker, on 15 May 2013 - 03:56 AM, said:

Are you serious !
No moon cities !
Well I'm off then , over to the Big Foot thread.
Cheerio.


Posted Image



Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#335    DONTEATUS

DONTEATUS

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 19,033 posts
  • Joined:15 Feb 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Planet TEXAS

Posted 15 May 2013 - 04:08 AM

psyche101 mate ! Put your Shades on this week ! THe Sun`s gonne get ya ! B)

This is a Work in Progress!

#336    Smirnov

Smirnov

    Alien Embryo

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 60 posts
  • Joined:02 May 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 15 May 2013 - 09:23 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 15 May 2013 - 03:21 AM, said:

So the supernovas we see are really an intergalactic war are they?

LOL.

The movie "Paul" was more realistic than this.
Are you trying to be funny? You're bad actor, you know that?


#337    Smirnov

Smirnov

    Alien Embryo

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 60 posts
  • Joined:02 May 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 15 May 2013 - 09:30 AM

View PostHazzard, on 14 May 2013 - 01:47 PM, said:

Posted Image
You want me to repeat it? You're wasting your precious time and energy with your pathetic crap.


#338    Smirnov

Smirnov

    Alien Embryo

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 60 posts
  • Joined:02 May 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 15 May 2013 - 09:52 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 14 May 2013 - 10:29 PM, said:

actually funny enough.. there was not that much ash as you put it in the cloud that covered new york when the towers fell.. it was dust.. not ash..
Here is your evidence of the footages proving that the blue sky over New York city's air was filled with enormous clouds of debris and Ash


http://911review.org...Concrete_2.html

Quote

The Ash in the streets of New York was not from the burning of paper, rubber, or wood. Rather, it was powdered concrete.
http://www.theweek.c...ld-trade-center

Quote

Aside from the Ash and dust spread over Manhattan, there was 1.2 million tons of debris.





#339    mcrom901

mcrom901

    plasmoid ninja

  • Member
  • 5,685 posts
  • Joined:29 Jan 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:multiverse

  • space debris, decided to evolve and become us!

Posted 15 May 2013 - 09:57 AM

View PostSmirnov, on 13 May 2013 - 04:08 PM, said:

From around 1:38:00 into the above Moon & Mars Lecture 1996, Alex Collier mentioned that "Moranae" 'told' him that

http://www.godlikepr...sage2160977/pg1

:sleepy:


#340    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,507 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Toowoomba QLD

  • Thought of the day

    'Never slam dance while priming plastic explosives'

    D.R Dodds

Posted 15 May 2013 - 10:05 AM

View PostSmirnov, on 15 May 2013 - 09:52 AM, said:

Here is your evidence of the footages proving that the blue sky over New York city's air was filled with enormous clouds of debris and Ash


http://911review.org...Concrete_2.html

http://www.theweek.c...ld-trade-center

you know.. I really wish people would actually understand what they are talking about..

its not ash.. its concrete dust..

the gullibility factor of people today really astounds me..

here is something that might actually make you understand this just a little better..



and another



are you starting to understand yet?

just incase..

this one kind of goes into what was in that dust.. please note when you go to the page.. it says dust.. not ash.. this is different research from a couple of health groups to look into the toxic effect of the workers etc.. cleaning up after they fell..

http://911research.w...dence/dust.html

so please.. do try to be factual.. its not that hard to do..


#341    Smirnov

Smirnov

    Alien Embryo

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 60 posts
  • Joined:02 May 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 15 May 2013 - 10:11 AM

View PostRlyeh, on 14 May 2013 - 09:44 AM, said:

No one said 911 happened on 2013,
You said >>As of 2013, New York hasn't became ash.<<, well, of course New York hasn't became ash in 2013, because it happened in 2001, not 2013.
And of course 911 didn't happen twice. Do you see anywhere were it should mention that 911 happened twice? You're wasting your time and energy with your crap.

Quote

and no even your link didn't say New York turned to ash.
Looking for this?

Alex Collier mentioned in that 1996 Moon & Mars Lecture that "Moranae" 'told' him that New York city will turn into "Ash", that's what he said about New York city, and he said that back in 1996, about 5 years before 911 took place... It will be "sacrificed", he said... It's going to be "sacrificed". "The Powers that be" already made that decision, it will be "sacrificed", an "offering", the souls that lives there their energy is going to be an "offering". >>An act of terrorism will turn it to "Ash"<<, that's what he said about New York city, keep in mind he said this back in 1996. He said 2000 by mistake all right, as 911 took place in 2001.
As you can see, Moranae predicted 911, even if Alex said 2000 by mistake.

Another thing Collier mentioned was "It will be sacrificed", and i have some interesting info here to back it up, http://www.cuttinged.../News/n1547.cfm

Quote

Finally, this attack on the Twin Towers also was a perfect Satanic Fire Sacrifice , as we detail in NEWS1541. Many pictures abounded that showed a Demon's face in the Fire high up on the Twin Towers. Two former Satanists called me within a couple of hours after those pictures were released, to tell me that those faces looked exactly like Demons they had seen during a ritual when Demons physically manifest themselves in this dimension. Cisco Wheeler further said that some of the most powerful Demons in Satan's kingdom were known as Fire Demons ; it was to these Demons that the ancient peoples -- including Jews -- sacrificed their children to Molech. The appearance of these Demons faces might be proof of what I have been saying -- that the attack was a Fire Ritual Sacrifice carried out by the Illuminati.



#342    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,507 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Toowoomba QLD

  • Thought of the day

    'Never slam dance while priming plastic explosives'

    D.R Dodds

Posted 15 May 2013 - 10:16 AM

View PostSmirnov, on 15 May 2013 - 10:11 AM, said:

You said >>As of 2013, New York hasn't became ash.<<, well, of course New York hasn't became ash in 2013, because it happened in 2001, not 2013.
And of course 911 didn't happen twice. Do you see anywhere were it should mention that 911 happened twice? You're wasting your time and energy with your crap.

Looking for this?

Alex Collier mentioned in that 1996 Moon & Mars Lecture that "Moranae" 'told' him that New York city will turn into "Ash", that's what he said about New York city, and he said that back in 1996, about 5 years before 911 took place... It will be "sacrificed", he said... It's going to be "sacrificed". "The Powers that be" already made that decision, it will be "sacrificed", an "offering", the souls that lives there their energy is going to be an "offering". >>An act of terrorism will turn it to "Ash"<<, that's what he said about New York city, keep in mind he said this back in 1996. He said 2000 by mistake all right, as 911 took place in 2001.
As you can see, Moranae predicted 911, even if Alex said 2000 by mistake.

Another thing Collier mentioned was "It will be sacrificed", and i have some interesting info here to back it up, http://www.cuttinged.../News/n1547.cfm

Yes and he also mentioned ash.. when there was no ash.. sorry mate.. but your argument is invalid..


#343    Smirnov

Smirnov

    Alien Embryo

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 60 posts
  • Joined:02 May 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 15 May 2013 - 10:18 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 15 May 2013 - 10:05 AM, said:

its not ash.. its concrete dust..
http://911review.org...Concrete_2.html

Quote


The Ash in the streets of New York was not from the burning of paper, rubber, or wood. Rather, it was powdered concrete.
http://www.theweek.c...ld-trade-center

Quote



Aside from the Ash and dust spread over Manhattan, there was 1.2 million tons of debris.
You're wasting your precious time and energy with your pathetic crap


#344    Smirnov

Smirnov

    Alien Embryo

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 60 posts
  • Joined:02 May 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 15 May 2013 - 10:22 AM

View PostDingoLingo, on 15 May 2013 - 10:16 AM, said:

Yes and he also mentioned ash.. when there was no ash..
You want me to repeat it? You're wasting your precious time and energy with your pathetic lying crap.


#345    DingoLingo

DingoLingo

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,507 posts
  • Joined:05 Jul 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Toowoomba QLD

  • Thought of the day

    'Never slam dance while priming plastic explosives'

    D.R Dodds

Posted 15 May 2013 - 10:27 AM

View PostSmirnov, on 15 May 2013 - 10:18 AM, said:

You're wasting your precious time and energy with your pathetic crap

Yes you are rather wasting your precious time and energy with your rather pathetic crap..

lets put your evidence up against mine shall we..

you say ash..

well here is the break down of what the 'ash' as you call it is primarily made of
The USGS Study

A study by the US Geological Survey (USGS) provides some analytical detail missing from the above study. It lists the elemental composition of a number of dust samples collected from outdoor and indoor locations. 3   The following table summarizes the percentages by weight of the more abundant elements in samples for which sulfur was measured. sample element: percentage by weight Si Ca Mg S Fe Al WTC 01-02 21.20 15.01 3.11 1.33 4.13 4.13 WTC 01-03 26.30 9.58 2.23 0.87 2.16 2.75 WTC 01-14 15.30 17.65 2.83 4.32 1.87 2.86 WTC 01-15 13.60 18.58 2.64 5.40 1.87 2.59 WTC 01-16 17.00 13.36 1.79 3.68 1.92 2.27 WTC 01-21 12.80 18.94 2.68 5.10 1.49 2.73 WTC 01-22 17.00 16.80 2.77 3.70 2.78 2.78 WTC 01-25 13.20 20.37 3.29 4.03 1.33 3.28 WTC 01-27 15.20 19.51 3.04 4.29 1.72 3.05 WTC 01-28 13.80 19.65 2.83 4.56 1.80 2.95
Gypsum, the primary constituent of most wallboard, has the formula CaSO4-2(H20), and is 18.62% sulfur and 23.38% calcium by weight. 4   Gypsum is also about 5% of portland cement, the binder used in most concrete and constituting. Since aggregate constitutes between 70% and 80% of most concrete, gypsum might account for 1% to 1.5% of the concrete in the towers. 5

A group of scientists at UC Davis, the DELTA Group (Detection and Evaluation of Long-range Transport of Aerosols), performed what they described as the "most thorough analysis yet" of Ground Zero dust and smoke in May of 2002. The study was based on the analysis of air samples from a rooftop air monitor about one mile north-northeast of Ground Zero. The group noted that very fine particles were found at levels not previously found in ambient air, and that the particles included metals such as vanadium. They also noted that particles of concrete and glass were coated with combustion products. 6
They identified high levels of coarse particles, above, which included powdered concrete and glass with a coating of combustion products, in size range of 5 to 12 micrometers diameter. Very fine particles were found at levels not previously seen in ambient air samples.

So.. what do you have..

let me guess..

that would be.. this guy..


so you see the problem here.. he predicts ash.. and low and behold.. there is.. no.. ash...

again.. your argument is invalid..





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users