I think what he meant was that although the book was fiction it bases its science on real and determined scientific data. In other words we could call it science fiction, not fantasy, one is a story based on real science the other is pure invention, without even the science being plausible.
Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.
48 replies to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users