For example you claim and believe that Israle was the agrressor in the 6 day war. Th t is NOT an historical fact but a piece of arab propaganda, and is not accepted as correct by unbiased historians. Israel carried out a preemptive strike in the face of military movenments and publicly stated military intent by arab states to attack invade and destroy it.
In doing so it won a war it might have lost if forced to fight a defensive war from limited terriotry surrounded by numerically superior enemies Remember i lived through those wars, reading about them every day, and listening to them on the radio and watching them unfold on the television. I studied them as they happened and then studied them again as part of a very fine history and politics education at a very good university.
Here is the basic fact. The state of Israel was legitimised under international law. It fought a guerrilla war both inside its own territory and outside it jus tto survive its establiahment which it should not have had to do. It then faced down and won a war against neighbouring states, immediately it declared its establishment. it has been under threat ever since . EVERY territorial gain by Israel has come from successfully defending itslef from attack And it has returned most of the lands it gained in those defensive actions despite this putting it at a strategic disadvantage and under greater military threat. That is history. The palestinian refugees, like many displaced people are a consequence of these wars. But whose fault are the wars? Historically they are the fault of the aggressors trying to destroy a legitimate nation state. All the rest is spin and propaganda.
If Israel was secure, felt safe and at peace, its relationship with palestinians inside its own borders would be very different and far more positive. I dont approve of how Isrealis treat the palestinians within israel but i can see why they act as they do, and I am not sure they have any other logical choice which does not risk the integrity and survival of israel.