Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 4 votes

UFOs Disabling Nuclear Missiles


  • Please log in to reply
193 replies to this topic

#31    AlasBabylon

AlasBabylon

    Extraterrestrial Entity

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 430 posts
  • Joined:28 Sep 2007
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 10 May 2013 - 11:17 AM

View Postdekker87, on 10 May 2013 - 11:07 AM, said:



which god?




The One and Only God... the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob...
the God of Israel, Jesus Christ.



.

Edited by AlasBabylon, 10 May 2013 - 11:18 AM.


#32    dannyboy52

dannyboy52

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 110 posts
  • Joined:15 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Male

  • You Can Fool Some People All Of The Time,And All Of The People Some Of The Time, But You Cant Fool All Of The People All Of The Time

Posted 10 May 2013 - 11:30 AM

View PostAlasBabylon, on 10 May 2013 - 11:17 AM, said:

The One and Only God... the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob...
the God of Israel, Jesus Christ.



.
So was it your god that shut down the missiles?


#33    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 10 May 2013 - 01:03 PM

quillius, quillius, quillius :lol: Here you are AGAIN.... High-jacking another thread with your nit-picking ....

Edited by DBunker, 10 May 2013 - 01:07 PM.

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins

#34    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,012 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 10 May 2013 - 01:06 PM

View PostDBunker, on 10 May 2013 - 01:03 PM, said:

quillius, quillius, quillius :lol: Here you are AGAIN.... High-jacking another thread with your nit-picking ....  :tu:

I nearly PM'd you to say you must come and have your little 'swipe' at me on this thread....glad  you came along and you didnt miss the opportunity...I would have been disappointed.


#35    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 10 May 2013 - 01:09 PM

View Postquillius, on 10 May 2013 - 01:06 PM, said:

I nearly PM'd you to say you must come and have your little 'swipe' at me on this thread....glad  you came along and you didnt miss the opportunity...I would have been disappointed.

Well, Im here now.... was is the topic this time, sarcasm, was it? :tsu:

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins

#36    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,012 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 10 May 2013 - 01:11 PM

View PostDBunker, on 10 May 2013 - 01:09 PM, said:

Well, Im here now.... was is the topic this time, sarcasm, was it? :tsu:

tut tut tut you are not implying you joined in to take the swipe with at least not reading the posts first.....naughty


#37    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 10 May 2013 - 01:19 PM

View Postquillius, on 10 May 2013 - 01:11 PM, said:

tut tut tut you are not implying you joined in to take the swipe with at least not reading the posts first.....naughty

I was more thinking about your attempt to start up anothr BS argument.... with your shot at the "meeting a time traveler AGAIN" post.

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins

#38    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,012 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 10 May 2013 - 01:31 PM

View PostDBunker, on 10 May 2013 - 01:19 PM, said:

I was more thinking about your attempt to start up anothr BS argument.... with your shot at the "meeting a time traveler AGAIN" post.

my shot at? no I questioned him seeing as he chose to ridicule another poster with sarcasm.

but I guess you ignore the initial poke by him due to him being an out and out 'debunker'........must be nice wearing those rose tinted glasses ay?

If you guys would follow Psyches style more you may have a leg to stand on....he is twice as vicious but backs it with debate....people you and Ryleh like to just stick the boot in then running.

One day...juts one day.....we might debate a case rather than this MO to ridicule and debunk...what are you guys scared of?


#39    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 10 May 2013 - 01:39 PM

View Postquillius, on 10 May 2013 - 01:31 PM, said:

my shot at? no I questioned him seeing as he chose to ridicule another poster with sarcasm.

but I guess you ignore the initial poke by him due to him being an out and out 'debunker'........must be nice wearing those rose tinted glasses ay?

If you guys would follow Psyches style more you may have a leg to stand on....he is twice as vicious but backs it with debate....people you and Ryleh like to just stick the boot in then running.

One day...juts one day.....we might debate a case rather than this MO to ridicule and debunk...what are you guys scared of?


Ridicule?? really.... If that is to ridicule you havent seen much. I saw that as (if anything) just a funny response to the (at least as funny) "maybe aliens are us from the future" idea.

What Im afraid of...... well Cancer sounds really awful.

Edited by DBunker, 10 May 2013 - 01:39 PM.

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins

#40    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,012 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 10 May 2013 - 01:46 PM

View PostDBunker, on 10 May 2013 - 01:39 PM, said:

Ridicule?? really.... If that is to ridicule you havent seen much. I saw that as (if anything) just a funny response to the (at least as funny) "maybe aliens are us from the future" idea.

What Im afraid of...... well Cancer sounds really awful.

I know you viewed it as a funny response...I thought I had covered that with the rose tinted glasses comment.

I dont think 'maybe aliens are us from the future' as funny....at what point does a funny response become ridicule?

as for what your afraid of...It seems once again 'context' is completely by passed.....never seen that happen before

come on DB give us your best case...one you know something about and can actually debate it....your pick......of course another option is to log out and wait until all the gangs here so you can take the usual swipe.

(if anyone fancies taking my bet....I say DB goes for option 2...I am happy to take odds of 1-50)


#41    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 10 May 2013 - 02:30 PM

View Postquillius, on 10 May 2013 - 01:46 PM, said:

I know you viewed it as a funny response...I thought I had covered that with the rose tinted glasses comment.

I dont think 'maybe aliens are us from the future' as funny....at what point does a funny response become ridicule?

as for what your afraid of...It seems once again 'context' is completely by passed.....never seen that happen before

come on DB give us your best case...one you know something about and can actually debate it....your pick......of course another option is to log out and wait until all the gangs here so you can take the usual swipe.

(if anyone fancies taking my bet....I say DB goes for option 2...I am happy to take odds of 1-50)


Well, I think that the Iranian UFO sighting from back in -74(?) is a good one. And the WOW signal is also one of my favorites. I dont see how either one is going to answer the UFO enigma for us.... do you?

But if you like to debate them, sure, lets.....

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins

#42    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,012 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 10 May 2013 - 02:37 PM

View PostDBunker, on 10 May 2013 - 02:30 PM, said:

Well, I think that the Iranian UFO sighting from back in -74(?) is a good one. And the WOW signal is also one of my favorites. I dont see how either one is going to answer the UFO enigma for us.... do you?

But if you like to debate them, sure, lets.....

was thinking more along the lines of one that you think is debunked...


#43    dekker87

dekker87

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,369 posts
  • Joined:08 Oct 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:england

Posted 10 May 2013 - 02:37 PM

View PostDBunker, on 10 May 2013 - 02:30 PM, said:

Well, I think that the Iranian UFO sighting from back in -74(?) is a good one. And the WOW signal is also one of my favorites. I dont see how either one is going to answer the UFO enigma for us.... do you?

But if you like to debate them, sure, lets.....

fermi paradox and the drake equation make the chances of anything from outer space appear very remote....as does the wow signal if you take it at face value.

why no radio signals from outer space??

ufop exist thruout recorded history...i've studied them for the best part of 40 years....back when being into this sort of thing required a little more effort than a few keystrokes on a keyboard....and recently i've totally changed my paradigm cncerning these....i'm now convinced we're either seeing inter-dimensional beings / craft....or time travellers.


#44    quillius

quillius

    52.0839 N, 1.4328 E

  • Member
  • 5,012 posts
  • Joined:04 Aug 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:LONDON

  • A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
    Albert Einstein

Posted 10 May 2013 - 02:40 PM

View Postdekker87, on 10 May 2013 - 02:37 PM, said:

fermi paradox and the drake equation make the chances of anything from outer space appear very remote....as does the wow signal if you take it at face value.

why no radio signals from outer space??

ufop exist thruout recorded history...i've studied them for the best part of 40 years....back when being into this sort of thing required a little more effort than a few keystrokes on a keyboard....and recently i've totally changed my paradigm cncerning these....i'm now convinced we're either seeing inter-dimensional beings / craft....or time travellers.

the inter dimensional hypothesis is definitely worth an interest IMO.


#45    DBunker

DBunker

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,485 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Male

  • I prefer to know, not just to believe.

Posted 10 May 2013 - 02:47 PM

View Postdekker87, on 10 May 2013 - 02:37 PM, said:

fermi paradox and the drake equation make the chances of anything from outer space appear very remote....as does the wow signal if you take it at face value.

why no radio signals from outer space??

ufop exist thruout recorded history...i've studied them for the best part of 40 years....back when being into this sort of thing required a little more effort than a few keystrokes on a keyboard....and recently i've totally changed my paradigm cncerning these....i'm now convinced we're either seeing inter-dimensional beings / craft....or time travellers.

Im not saying that any of my two examples are ET..... Im saying that the best UFO cases are unexplained. There is a hugh difference.

As for the time travelers or interdimensional visitors idea..... Why not throw in Bug People from inner Earth, or, maybe we are living in a simulated reality and UFOs are bugs in the softwear??

No, I believe that all these UFOs could be explained with the mundane, if we had all the information necessary.

View Postquillius, on 10 May 2013 - 02:40 PM, said:

the inter dimensional hypothesis is definitely worth an interest IMO.

So is the Matrix hypothesis.

Now that communications technology has made it possible to give global reach to the bizarre and archive it forever, it is essential for men and women of reason resolutely to counter the delusions of the fringe element. James S. Robbins




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users