Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 2 votes

IRS Admits to targeting


  • Please log in to reply
72 replies to this topic

#1    F3SS

F3SS

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,388 posts
  • Joined:11 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, Pa

Posted 10 May 2013 - 09:19 PM

Ignore those voices who warn of tyranny~ B.O.


Quote

UPDATE 2:03 p.m. ET – The story has taken yet another weird turn. The IRS in an attempt to explain itself released the following statement [emphases added]:

Between 2010 and 2012, the IRS saw the number of applications for section 501©(4) status double. As a result, local career employees in Cincinnati sought to centralize work and assign cases to designated employees in an effort to promote consistency and quality. This approach has worked in other areas.
However, the IRS recognizes we should have done a better job of handling the influx of advocacy applications. While centralizing cases for consistency made sense, the way we initially centralized them did not. Mistakes were made initially, but they were in no way due to any political or partisan rationale.
We fixed the situation last year and have made significant progress in moving the centralized cases through our system. To date, more than half of the cases have been approved or withdrawn.  It is important to recognize that all centralized applications received the same, even-handed treatment, and the majority of cases centralized were not based on a specific name.
In addition, new procedures also were implemented last year to ensure that these mistakes won’t be made in the future. The IRS also stresses that our employees – all career civil servants — will continue to be guided by tax law and not partisan issues.
However, this clearly contradicts Lerner’s earlier claim that the IRS looked for groups that included the words “tea party” or “patriot” in their applications for tax-exempt status.
So what’s really going on?

If this was just some sort of bureaucratic hiccup (as the IRS statement claims it was), then what, exactly, was Lerner talking about? Also, you can’t say that this was entirely “nonpartisan” when Lerner  — a top ranking official — specifically stated that they were flagging groups that used “patriot” and “tea party” in their applications.

Someone needs to get their story straight.

UPDATE 1:43 p.m. ET – In case you were wondering why the IRS hadn’t mentioned or addressed this issue until today, here’s your “answer”:

IRS says no apology before today because no one ever asked.
about 2 hours ago via webReplyRetweetFavorite
@ktumulty
Karen Tumulty

Much more... http://www.theblaze....-2012-election/


Seriously, anyone think this wasn't on request of an administration looking for reasons to trash conservatives during an election season? After all, every other attempt failed. James Holmes, not a tea partier. Jared Laughner, not a tea partier, not inspired by Palin. George Zimmerman, not a white racist. Racism in the tea party, couldn't even find it by offering a huge reward. Mitt Romney, paid his taxes contrary to weasel Reid's nonexistent source. All you hear from the left is how washed up and insignificant the tea party and conservatism is. If so, why the need to go far out of the way to find dirt?
How insulting is that tweet btw? Because no one asked... The gall. I hate these henchmen. They aren't even a government institution. They're the goons for the Federal Reserve and our government are their soldiers. The Reserve are the real bosses. Argghhh! So many things to btch about!

Posted Image

#2    tapirmusic

tapirmusic

    Astral Projection

  • Closed
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 643 posts
  • Joined:24 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 10 May 2013 - 09:42 PM

Yeah, this is outrageous.
An apology isn't going to cut it this time.

Blood for the blood god!
Skulls for the skull throne!


#3    Kowalski

Kowalski

    The Original Penguin Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • 4,102 posts
  • Joined:14 Mar 2013
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:* Madgascar *

  • It's All Some Kind Of Wacked Out Conspiracy....

Posted 10 May 2013 - 09:48 PM

I totally believe this and doesn't surprise me at all.

Why are the Democrats so scared of the Tea party? Hmmm.....


#4    tapirmusic

tapirmusic

    Astral Projection

  • Closed
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 643 posts
  • Joined:24 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 10 May 2013 - 10:04 PM

FLASHBACK 2009: Obama Jokes About IRS Auditing Political Enemies



Back in May 2009, Professor Glenn Reynolds, better known to his followers as Instapundit, penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in which he discussed some odd rhetoric from President Obama. Obama had been refused an honorary doctorate by Arizona State University, and Obama remarked, “President [Michael] Crowe and the Board of Regents will soon learn all about being audited by the IRS.” Reynolds pointed out:



Just a joke about the power of the presidency. Made by Jay Leno it might have been funny. But as told by Mr. Obama, the actual president of the United States, it's hard to see the humor. Surely he's aware that other presidents, most notably Richard Nixon, have abused the power of the Internal Revenue Service to harass their political opponents. But that abuse generated a powerful backlash and with good reason. Should the IRS come to be seen as just a bunch of enforcers for whoever is in political power, the result would be an enormous loss of legitimacy for the tax system.


As it turns out, the IRS under President Obama routinely gave special scrutiny for groups with the terms “tea party” or “patriots” in their titles. His little joke doesn’t read much like a joke anymore.

http://www.breitbart...litical-enemies


#5    Kowalski

Kowalski

    The Original Penguin Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • 4,102 posts
  • Joined:14 Mar 2013
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:* Madgascar *

  • It's All Some Kind Of Wacked Out Conspiracy....

Posted 10 May 2013 - 10:14 PM

View Posttapirmusic, on 10 May 2013 - 10:04 PM, said:

FLASHBACK 2009: Obama Jokes About IRS Auditing Political Enemies



Back in May 2009, Professor Glenn Reynolds, better known to his followers as Instapundit, penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in which he discussed some odd rhetoric from President Obama. Obama had been refused an honorary doctorate by Arizona State University, and Obama remarked, “President [Michael] Crowe and the Board of Regents will soon learn all about being audited by the IRS.” Reynolds pointed out:



Just a joke about the power of the presidency. Made by Jay Leno it might have been funny. But as told by Mr. Obama, the actual president of the United States, it's hard to see the humor. Surely he's aware that other presidents, most notably Richard Nixon, have abused the power of the Internal Revenue Service to harass their political opponents. But that abuse generated a powerful backlash and with good reason. Should the IRS come to be seen as just a bunch of enforcers for whoever is in political power, the result would be an enormous loss of legitimacy for the tax system.


As it turns out, the IRS under President Obama routinely gave special scrutiny for groups with the terms “tea party” or “patriots” in their titles. His little joke doesn’t read much like a joke anymore.

http://www.breitbart...litical-enemies

:tu:

Wow, great post!


#6    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 10,246 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queensland, Australia.

Posted 10 May 2013 - 11:01 PM

View Posttapirmusic, on 10 May 2013 - 09:42 PM, said:

Blood for the blood god!
Skulls for the skull throne!
HARRIERS FOR THE CUP!


#7    Simbi Laveau

Simbi Laveau

    Overlord A. Snuffleupagus

  • Member
  • 8,266 posts
  • Joined:26 Feb 2012
  • Location:Rim of hell

  • ~So what's all this then ?!

Posted 10 May 2013 - 11:24 PM

View Posttapirmusic, on 10 May 2013 - 10:04 PM, said:

    FLASHBACK 2009: Obama Jokes About IRS Auditing Political Enemies



    Back in May 2009, Professor Glenn Reynolds, better known to his followers as Instapundit, penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in which he discussed some odd rhetoric from President Obama. Obama had been refused an honorary doctorate by Arizona State University, and Obama remarked, “President [Michael] Crowe and the Board of Regents will soon learn all about being audited by the IRS.” Reynolds pointed out:



Just a joke about the power of the presidency. Made by Jay Leno it might have been funny. But as told by Mr. Obama, the actual president of the United States, it's hard to see the humor. Surely he's aware that other presidents, most notably Richard Nixon, have abused the power of the Internal Revenue Service to harass their political opponents. But that abuse generated a powerful backlash and with good reason. Should the IRS come to be seen as just a bunch of enforcers for whoever is in political power, the result would be an enormous loss of legitimacy for the tax system.


As it turns out, the IRS under President Obama routinely gave special scrutiny for groups with the terms “tea party” or “patriots” in their titles. His little joke doesn’t read much like a joke anymore.

http://www.breitbart...litical-enemies

Wow...
I heard they're going to target small business owners next .
God forbid you should try to make a living on your own terms ,and be successful .

Miss me?

#8    Kowalski

Kowalski

    The Original Penguin Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • 4,102 posts
  • Joined:14 Mar 2013
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:* Madgascar *

  • It's All Some Kind Of Wacked Out Conspiracy....

Posted 11 May 2013 - 12:07 AM

View PostSimbi Laveau, on 10 May 2013 - 11:24 PM, said:

Wow...
I heard they're going to target small business owners next .
God forbid you should try to make a living on your own terms ,and be successful .

Dude, they already do. If you have a small business, you are a 100x more likely to be audited by the IRS. I know this for a fact.


#9    F3SS

F3SS

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,388 posts
  • Joined:11 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, Pa

Posted 11 May 2013 - 12:36 AM

View PostKowalski, on 11 May 2013 - 12:07 AM, said:



Dude, they already do. If you have a small business, you are a 100x more likely to be audited by the IRS. I know this for a fact.
I know there's a million "how-to's" on avoiding the tax man but one thing I heard that always stuck with me was that if your business shows a profit for three years in a row your red flag status declines dramatically. I think my accountant told me that. A classic small business cheat is to collect every receipt you can find, sticking out of gas pumps or lying in a grocery cart and such, and use those for write offs. As ridiculous as that is in the first place just for the fact that not just anything can be written off some knuckleheads use so many material receipts they begin to chip away at the profits and some show so many that it appears as if they spent more money then they brought in.
Sometimes that turns out to be legit and is generally accepted for the first couple years in business but after so long if you're not showing a profit you're either running a business terribly or you're cheating.
Just a tip for any small business hopefuls... First hire an accountant even if you're going to be a sole proprietor. Second, hire a lawyer if you're going with LLC or incorporating. Those things are the cheap part. Screwing up your taxes and/or getting audited will be the expensive part. If you're hiring employees you definitely need those services but make sure you have a payroll accountant. A couple years ago I actually left my accountant because my bank offered online payroll that I could do myself. That lasted only 3 months before I came crawling back to her. First, the time it took up. Second, the forms and paperwork that began showing up. I about lost it. It was a nightmare. Anyhow, when I went back she went through the mess I made and ended up saving me a thousand dollars that I almost gave to the IRS. Her services only cost a couple grand a year or about $35-$40 a week on average. So having an accountant will pay for itself. I could've been making a lot more than $35-$40 a week in the time I was spending trying to do and comprehend payroll.
I know I know, I go on sometimes but when I feel there is advice to be given I can't help myself.

Edited by F3SS, 11 May 2013 - 12:39 AM.

Posted Image

#10    Kowalski

Kowalski

    The Original Penguin Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • 4,102 posts
  • Joined:14 Mar 2013
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:* Madgascar *

  • It's All Some Kind Of Wacked Out Conspiracy....

Posted 11 May 2013 - 01:00 AM

View PostF3SS, on 11 May 2013 - 12:36 AM, said:

I know there's a million "how-to's" on avoiding the tax man but one thing I heard that always stuck with me was that if your business shows a profit for three years in a row your red flag status declines dramatically. I think my accountant told me that. A classic small business cheat is to collect every receipt you can find, sticking out of gas pumps or lying in a grocery cart and such, and use those for write offs. As ridiculous as that is in the first place just for the fact that not just anything can be written off some knuckleheads use so many material receipts they begin to chip away at the profits and some show so many that it appears as if they spent more money then they brought in.
Sometimes that turns out to be legit and is generally accepted for the first couple years in business but after so long if you're not showing a profit you're either running a business terribly or you're cheating.
Just a tip for any small business hopefuls... First hire an accountant even if you're going to be a sole proprietor. Second, hire a lawyer if you're going with LLC or incorporating. Those things are the cheap part. Screwing up your taxes and/or getting audited will be the expensive part. If you're hiring employees you definitely need those services but make sure you have a payroll accountant. A couple years ago I actually left my accountant because my bank offered online payroll that I could do myself. That lasted only 3 months before I came crawling back to her. First, the time it took up. Second, the forms and paperwork that began showing up. I about lost it. It was a nightmare. Anyhow, when I went back she went through the mess I made and ended up saving me a thousand dollars that I almost gave to the IRS. Her services only cost a couple grand a year or about $35-$40 a week on average. So having an accountant will pay for itself. I could've been making a lot more than $35-$40 a week in the time I was spending trying to do and comprehend payroll.
I know I know, I go on sometimes but when I feel there is advice to be given I can't help myself.

You haven't gone on and on. You have some very helpful advice. Me and my husband have to hire someone to do our taxes. But it was TOTALLY worth it. My husband is considered a "contractor" and I have my own home business, so it is really complicated. But glad I was able to find someone who could help us.
Having your own business, or being paid by a check and not having taxes taken out, is a really complicated business unfortunately....


#11    F3SS

F3SS

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,388 posts
  • Joined:11 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, Pa

Posted 11 May 2013 - 01:25 AM

View PostKowalski, on 11 May 2013 - 01:00 AM, said:



You haven't gone on and on. You have some very helpful advice. Me and my husband have to hire someone to do our taxes. But it was TOTALLY worth it. My husband is considered a "contractor" and I have my own home business, so it is really complicated. But glad I was able to find someone who could help us.
Having your own business, or being paid by a check and not having taxes taken out, is a really complicated business unfortunately....
If you don't have employees it really isn't too complicated. Basically, you should save your legitimately business related receipts. If you buy business related things in different categories such as office supplies or job materials keep them separated and keep tack of them on a spreadsheet in proper category columns. Most importantly, every dollar you get just take 30% and put it in a separate checking account labeled tax account. Just put that money away and forget you have it. Every thousand you make put away $300. It adds up fast. My tax account is always far larger then my personal account which is the money that I get to save and keepIf you pull in $5000 one month and spend it all just know that you'll be behind in your taxes by $1500 that you'll have to make up eventually. Oh yea, and keep a business checking account too. Maybe not right away but as soon as you can get a few bucks stashed into one use only that account to buy business things. Deposit all payments into that account and write yourself paychecks from that account and put them in your personal one. Then, transfer 30% of that into your tax account and cry every time you look at all that money you have to give away. Do not make a habit of keeping the same account for business and personal.
Youre smart though so I'm sure you know much of this already. I don't know everything but I've been in business for several years and always learn more. All that stuff was overwhelming at first but it gets to be second nature. Ask me anytime you may have a question. Im a contractor too. As I said, I don't know it all but I might be able to help although I bet if you do it'll be the one thing I have no idea about.

Edited by F3SS, 11 May 2013 - 01:28 AM.

Posted Image

#12    Kowalski

Kowalski

    The Original Penguin Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • 4,102 posts
  • Joined:14 Mar 2013
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:* Madgascar *

  • It's All Some Kind Of Wacked Out Conspiracy....

Posted 11 May 2013 - 01:34 AM

View PostF3SS, on 11 May 2013 - 01:25 AM, said:

If you don't have employees it really isn't too complicated. Basically, you should save your legitimately business related receipts. If you buy business related things in different categories such as office supplies or job materials keep them separated and keep tack of them on a spreadsheet in proper category columns. Most importantly, every dollar you get just take 30% and put it in a separate checking account labeled tax account. Just put that money away and forget you have it. Every thousand you make put away $300. It adds up fast. My tax account is always far larger then my personal account which is the money that I get to save and keepIf you pull in $5000 one month and spend it all just know that you'll be behind in your taxes by $1500 that you'll have to make up eventually. Oh yea, and keep a business checking account too. Maybe not right away but as soon as you can get a few bucks stashed into one use only that account to buy business things. Deposit all payments into that account and write yourself paychecks from that account and put them in your personal one. Then, transfer 30% of that into your tax account and cry every time you look at all that money you have to give away. Do not make a habit of keeping the same account for business and personal.
Youre smart though so I'm sure you know much of this already. I don't know everything but I've been in business for several years and always learn more. All that stuff was overwhelming at first but it gets to be second nature. Ask me anytime you may have a question. Im a contractor too. As I said, I don't know it all but I might be able to help although I bet if you do it'll be the one thing I have no idea about.

Thanks for the advice. I'm really good about keeping ALL receipts and I'm very organized. And me and my husband always put back a little bit of our paychecks for taxes. Even if you don't use all the money for taxes, it's better to be safe then sorry.


#13    F3SS

F3SS

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,388 posts
  • Joined:11 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, Pa

Posted 11 May 2013 - 01:43 AM

View PostKowalski, on 11 May 2013 - 01:34 AM, said:



Thanks for the advice. I'm really good about keeping ALL receipts and I'm very organized. And me and my husband always put back a little bit of our paychecks for taxes. Even if you don't use all the money for taxes, it's better to be safe then sorry.
That's true. Good luck to you.

Posted Image

#14    tapirmusic

tapirmusic

    Astral Projection

  • Closed
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 643 posts
  • Joined:24 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 12 May 2013 - 11:06 AM

http://hotair.com/ar...tical-thuggery/

Darrell Issa: My committee will “aggressively follow up” on the IRS’s political thuggery


House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Subcommittee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio., requested the IG look into allegations of political retaliation last June. In response to the today’s disclosure and apology by IRS, Issa and Jordan issued the following statement:
“The fact that Americans were targeted by the IRS because of their political beliefs is unconscionable. The Committee will aggressively follow up on the IG report and hold responsible officials accountable for this political retaliation.”





Darrel Issa is my local rep.
I emailed him immediately once I saw this story.
Hope my email helped move this investigation forward. :)


#15    Kowalski

Kowalski

    The Original Penguin Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • 4,102 posts
  • Joined:14 Mar 2013
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:* Madgascar *

  • It's All Some Kind Of Wacked Out Conspiracy....

Posted 12 May 2013 - 01:51 PM

View Posttapirmusic, on 12 May 2013 - 11:06 AM, said:

http://hotair.com/ar...tical-thuggery/

Darrell Issa: My committee will “aggressively follow up” on the IRS’s political thuggery


House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Subcommittee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio., requested the IG look into allegations of political retaliation last June. In response to the today’s disclosure and apology by IRS, Issa and Jordan issued the following statement:
“The fact that Americans were targeted by the IRS because of their political beliefs is unconscionable. The Committee will aggressively follow up on the IG report and hold responsible officials accountable for this political retaliation.”



Darrel Issa is my local rep.
I emailed him immediately once I saw this story.
Hope my email helped move this investigation forward. :)

Wow. Nice that at least someone is doing something about this. It's been all over Yahoo news....





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users