The Senate voted overwhelmingly -- 71 to 27-- against an amendment to the sweeping farm bill, squashing a measure that would not have required labeling of genetically modified organisms, but merely would have let states decide if they wanted to require such labeling.
"The concept we're talking about today is a fairly commonsense and non-radical idea," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the sponsor of the amendment, said shortly before the vote. "All over the world, in the European Union, in many other countries around the world, dozens and dozens of countries, people are able to look at the food that they are buying and determine through labeling whether or not that product contains genetically modified organisms."
Sanders has noted that more than 3,000 ingredients are required to be labeled, but genetically modified ingredients are not part of that list. His state and Connecticut have passed laws to require such labeling, but Sanders said local leaders fear that large biotech corporations such as Monsanto could sue the states on the grounds that they are preempting federal authority. He said his bill would make clear that states can do what they want on the issue.
I decided to put this is the conspiracy category primarily because of this statement:
I firmly believe that the FDA approval on many GMOs lacks any real depth with respect to long.term and environmental impact.
To be clear, I´m not against GM foods. I just believe that if the majority of people are calling for labelling, then it should happen.
U.S. Polls on GE Food Labeling