Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 5 votes

why did satan get kicked out of heaven


  • Please log in to reply
886 replies to this topic

#871    LostSouls7

LostSouls7

    Lost Ghost

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,330 posts
  • Joined:21 Oct 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NetherWorld

Posted 26 July 2013 - 05:46 AM

So let me get this straight..
Set is Satan...
but satan is just a personification of the planet Saturn...
they called the planet Satan....

So if Satan and Set.. are a planet.. then he's STILL IN heaven!

So all the Summerian Texts talk about "the end" etc
and a lot of stuff Christians talk about...
And then Satan was stolen from the God Set..
which is only a planet...but
here the Christians turned him into a demon monster with horns.

This is interesting...

I think this is info organized religions don't want people to read about.
Then they would lose a lot of money control over people...
something to ponder

Edited by LostSouls7, 26 July 2013 - 05:46 AM.

Scary story about being scratched at 5 AM. Real demon attack story!
https://www.youtube....h?v=_Kzw8RRFsMQ

My collection of true and fiction ghost and ouija stories, horror movie reviews etc.
http://ouijaghosts.blogspot.com/

#872    Truthseeker007

Truthseeker007

    Ectoplasmic Residue

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 223 posts
  • Joined:22 Jul 2013
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 July 2013 - 05:47 AM

View PostEtu Malku, on 25 July 2013 - 11:03 PM, said:

"AE never saw Set as we see "Satan"" That would depend on how you see the Prince of Darkness, which is who I associated Set with. even with Satan, groups of people understand him differently than each other, a Satanic Order is not going to view Satan the same as the Roman Catholic Church.

I understood perfectly well what you posted, it is you who doesn't understand what I am saying. Your information, as I researched was from some stupid site called "Hollywood Subliminals" . . . my information comes from scholarly research and academically sound texts.

Where I have nothing against Mr. Lewis Loflin, from where you drew this information from, I would have to question someone's scholarship who doesn't have any degree from college or a University, though he does have honors from Northeast State Technical Community College in Computer Information Technology. Mr. Loflin sounds like an intelligent man from what I have read, but if you (or anyone else) wishes to really get to the bottom of research, you need to go to the top of researchers.

The Torah dates from 1500 BC- Abraham was 1800 BC. Zoroastrianism is from between 800 and 600 BC, and the oldest references to it are only from around 250 BC. Judaism is much older than Zoroastrianism. Early Judaism was not a dual-based religion as was Zoroastrian, Christian, and Muslim.

Older than all of these is the original monotheistic cult of the Aten designed by Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaten.
Good vs Evil, and the days of end can be traced to ancient Sumerian stories long before anything Judeo-Christian-Muslim.

Just because something comes from "scholarly research and academically sound texts" does not make it true. You don't need a degree from
some stupid college to do research. College is just a scam anyway.

No one can say definitively one way or the other. Historians cannot "find" Moses, the alleged founder of Judaism, so much like Hinduism it's difficult to date since it's generally seen as a religion that slowly emerged on its own.
Zoroaster, who has been deemed a historical figure, cannot be pinpointed to a given century, let alone a millennium. Some say he was as early as 2000 BCE some say as late as 100 CE. Until Zoroaster's era can be decided and/or the historicity of Moses be found, the question is rather unanswerable.

"Whether Zoroastrianism is older than Judaism is uncertain. Nevertheless, it has had an undeniable impact upon Western religious belief. Examples include a tangible, active force for evil (Angra Mainyu, or Satan); a judgment of souls after death; and afterlives in heaven and hell. None of these ideas are present in original Judaism. It is possible that the Jews heard them at the end of the Babylonian Exile, under the Persian emperor Cyrus.

Zoroastrianism and Judaism:

Zoroastrianism and Judaism have ties that were knotted many centuries before Christianity appeared on the religious stage of this planet. The Zoroastrian way of life has markedly influenced the early Hebrew religious fabric. Just how did this come about both at the social and doctrinal level is a subject worth exploring and understanding.

Read more: http://www.meta-reli...m#ixzz2a8CNt9tl

Edited by Truthseeker007, 26 July 2013 - 06:40 AM.

Spiral Symbolism:
Evolution and holistic growth:Letting go, surrender, release
Awareness of the one within the context of the whole
Connectivity and union with deific and cosmic energies

"Connectivity to the Divine" observation

#873    LostSouls7

LostSouls7

    Lost Ghost

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,330 posts
  • Joined:21 Oct 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NetherWorld

Posted 26 July 2013 - 06:21 AM

Moses was A Wizard... huge beard, robs and magic staff.
Only thing was missing was the wizard hat

Scary story about being scratched at 5 AM. Real demon attack story!
https://www.youtube....h?v=_Kzw8RRFsMQ

My collection of true and fiction ghost and ouija stories, horror movie reviews etc.
http://ouijaghosts.blogspot.com/

#874    Arpee

Arpee

    .::The Spirit Gives Life::.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,413 posts
  • Joined:08 Jan 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Heaven on Earth

  • ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God." - Matthew 5:9

Posted 26 July 2013 - 06:23 AM

View PostLostSouls7, on 26 July 2013 - 05:46 AM, said:

So let me get this straight..
Set is Satan...
but satan is just a personification of the planet Saturn...
they called the planet Satan....

It is true that The Ancient Egyptians associated their gods with certain stars in the sky, but The Gods aren't stars themselves.

For example, The Goddess Isis was associated with Sirius, but the word for Sirius was "Sopdet".

View PostLostSouls7, on 26 July 2013 - 05:46 AM, said:

I think this is info organized religions don't want people to read about.
Then they would lose a lot of money control over people...

Exactly. They don't want people to know the roots of Satan because it is not as scary as they make it to be. They made Satan "scary" by preaching that Satan is a deceiving being that got thrown out of "heaven" and now wants everyone to burn in hell. People can believe what they want, but that story of Satan sure did change so much over time.

Edited by Arpee, 26 July 2013 - 06:28 AM.

"But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil." - Luke 6:35

#875    Big Bad Voodoo

Big Bad Voodoo

    High priest of Darwinism

  • Member
  • 9,582 posts
  • Joined:15 Nov 2010
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 July 2013 - 07:13 AM

Sadly we will never know. Because different sources mentioned all kind of different things.

JFK: "And we are as a people, inherently and historically, opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy..."

#876    Tutankhaten-pasheri

Tutankhaten-pasheri

    Buratinologist

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,637 posts
  • Joined:22 Sep 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:страна дураков

Posted 26 July 2013 - 07:22 AM

View PostEtu Malku, on 25 July 2013 - 11:03 PM, said:

"AE never saw Set as we see "Satan"" That would depend on how you see the Prince of Darkness, which is who I associated Set with. even with Satan, groups of people understand him differently than each other, a Satanic Order is not going to view Satan the same as the Roman Catholic
To me it is not a matter of how I or Catholic Church see Satan. I do not believe in such a creature, no matter if they are "evil", or as you see them. I also do not believe in a self creating, creator "God". There are large elements of what you have written that I agree with as concerns the destruction and deliberate distortion of the old paganism by the Christian Church. You see, as many of us do, that the modern Satan is hammered together from various old gods, I think Baal and Pan being foremost, yet with Set I think you do no different to the Christian destroyers. My point is that you have taken Set and overlayed your ideas on him. There is nothing in AE history that indicates they thought of Set in the terms that you do, and nothing until after the pharoanic period had ended to suggest that they saw Set as "The evil one". Edfu, which contains the scenes of Horus killing Set, is not typical of AE thought as it was constructed in a very late period, when Egyptians were ruled by foreigners. I do see and understand what you say about Satan, but I disagree that you overlay modern ideas on an AE god when there is no evidence that AE saw him in such terms. You need to look elsewhere, or create your own "God", for to attribute your ideas of Satan onto Set means that Ra, Osiris and Horus must also be included as they are so intertwined. If Set is Satan, then so must be Horus, despite what we see at Edfu, and Horus is certainly not an element of any Satan.

Edited by Tutankhaten-pasheri, 26 July 2013 - 08:09 AM.


#877    Etu Malku

Etu Malku

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts
  • Joined:03 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 July 2013 - 06:35 PM

View PostTutankhaten-pasheri, on 26 July 2013 - 07:22 AM, said:

To me it is not a matter of how I or Catholic Church see Satan. I do not believe in such a creature, no matter if they are "evil", or as you see them. I also do not believe in a self creating, creator "God". There are large elements of what you have written that I agree with as concerns the destruction and deliberate distortion of the old paganism by the Christian Church. You see, as many of us do, that the modern Satan is hammered together from various old gods, I think Baal and Pan being foremost, yet with Set I think you do no different to the Christian destroyers. My point is that you have taken Set and overlayed your ideas on him. There is nothing in AE history that indicates they thought of Set in the terms that you do, and nothing until after the pharoanic period had ended to suggest that they saw Set as "The evil one". Edfu, which contains the scenes of Horus killing Set, is not typical of AE thought as it was constructed in a very late period, when Egyptians were ruled by foreigners. I do see and understand what you say about Satan, but I disagree that you overlay modern ideas on an AE god when there is no evidence that AE saw him in such terms. You need to look elsewhere, or create your own "God", for to attribute your ideas of Satan onto Set means that Ra, Osiris and Horus must also be included as they are so intertwined. If Set is Satan, then so must be Horus, despite what we see at Edfu, and Horus is certainly not an element of any Satan.
Oh Ye of Little Faith . . . :devil:

Images of Set have been dated to ca.3200 BCE, with astronomically‑based estimates of inscriptions dating to 5000 BCE. Set’s original name meant “cutter” or “Isolator” ‑ he is the personification of the process of initiation‑ of becoming more and more your own self.

The Egyptian god Set went through periods of immense popularity alternating with total denunciation. Set in the predynastic and archaic periods was an essentially positive deity introduced from the east as a god of the “extension” of “existence“. He is therefore god of “expanding” borders and radical changes of being, particularly birth, circumcision/ initiation, death in battle, and rebirth through the Opening of the Mouth ceremony. Popular among easterners, his first cult site being Pelusium in the eastern Delta, Set’s worship quickly spread to the “border” areas, where he was identified with local gods of initiation.

Set’s original worship as a nighttime/polar deity suffered a decline with the rise of solar worship in the IVth dynasty. The Great Pyramid of Khufu is one of the last early monuments connected with the idea of the Setian afterlife as well as a solar one. The Great Pyramid had a special air shaft for the king’s “akh” to fly to the stars of Set. During the Middle Kingdom, Set was reduced to a symbol of Upper Egypt. It was during the time that Set was first blamed for the murder of Osirisa, a Semitic corn god who had arrived in the 3rd dynasty. The essential function of Set, was expanding the borders of existence and the returning that Chaotic energy to the center, this is the darkness that binds together the Egyptian light. The murder of Osiris is the destruction of the fetters of society, of accepting self‑change and civilization over the forces that lead stagnation.

The foreigners who ruled Egypt who were known as the Hyksos, they identified themselves with Set and established their capital at the ancient Setian site, Avaris. By the 19th and 20th dynasties a family of Setian priests from Tanis became the pharaonic line. During this time of expanding, borders, Set was extraordinarily popular, as can be seen from pharaohs’ names such as Seti (Set’s man) and Setnakt (Set is mighty). Two important Setian text were produced: First, the “Tale of Two Brothers” tells how Set (identified with the god Batta, whos name means “Lord of this world”) undergoes a series of metamorphoses (Kheperu) that changed him from a farm hand to a star in the constellation of the Thigh.

Soon afterwards Egypt entered a long decline, Set became a tremendously unpopular deity. His worship ceased everywhere except the oases and the city of Thebes, where his cult was absorbed into the cult of Montu, the warlord of Thebes. The negative and destructive aspects of isolation and destruction were emphasized and as Egypt turned more to an idealized past, Set‑hen, the god of the “Void” called the future, came to resemble the Christian Satan. (Set‑hen = Satan)

The Left Hand Path is a quest to become an immortal, potent, and powerful Essence. Set's other enemy is the demon of mindless chaos, Apep. Set is said to slay this creature every night just before dawn. This symbolizes overcoming self doubt and delusion, of acting at the times of greatest despair, or not being lulled to sleep by the powerful self‑hypnotizing engines of mankind.

Edited by Etu Malku, 26 July 2013 - 06:35 PM.

Tarkhem Productions
   IAMTHATIAMNOT

#878    Tutankhaten-pasheri

Tutankhaten-pasheri

    Buratinologist

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,637 posts
  • Joined:22 Sep 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:страна дураков

Posted 26 July 2013 - 07:13 PM

Set is Egyptian from the beginning. He was originally a god of the desert and represented confusion and chaos, rather like Pan. In this aspect, that of chaos, then yes, there is an element of the Satan you see, and also the Satan of Christianity. It would be wrong of me to say that Set has none of the attributes of Satan, for that is why he has beeen hijacked into that mythical creature along with other gods. You confuse these foreigners I mention. It is not the Hyksos, as Edfu was built in the Ptolemaic period, so the foreigners were Greeks. The Hyksos were expelled from Egypt more than a thousand years earlier. They had identified Set with Baal, and it is likely that this identification with foreign rule, despite popularity with the Ramessids some hundreds of years later, led to his complete fall and thus the images we see at Edfu in a time of foreign occupation. I believe any "bad" elements of Set are from this later identification with foreigners, not from his original personality and purpose, to stand in the bow of the solar barque and repel Apophis. The story of the Contendings of Set and Horus, are, to me, an analogy of early Egyptian pre-history. If the differences between Set and Horus were so great, then why would Set have been, for a time, seen as equal to Horus, why the statue of Ramesses III being crowned by Horus and Set as equals..

Your contention that a family of "Setian" priests from Tanis came to power is wrong. I presume you mean the Ramessids. They certainly came from the Delta, but not Tanis, as that city was not built until Ramesses III became Pharaoh. The first Ramessid, Ramesses I was not a priest, he was a general, an old comrade of Horemheb. There is much more, but time is against me. In this affair an element is missed out, mostly because it is not understood. It is the second shrine of Tutankhamun dealing with the afterlife. It is not part of the Am-Duat as anybody understands it. It needs understanding before any modern person can say what AE really believes regards death and what may come after, and perhaps even the nature of gods.


#879    Etu Malku

Etu Malku

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts
  • Joined:03 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 July 2013 - 09:59 PM

View PostTutankhaten-pasheri, on 26 July 2013 - 07:13 PM, said:

Set is Egyptian from the beginning. He was originally a god of the desert and represented confusion and chaos, rather like Pan. In this aspect, that of chaos, then yes, there is an element of the Satan you see, and also the Satan of Christianity. It would be wrong of me to say that Set has none of the attributes of Satan, for that is why he has beeen hijacked into that mythical creature along with other gods. You confuse these foreigners I mention. It is not the Hyksos, as Edfu was built in the Ptolemaic period, so the foreigners were Greeks. The Hyksos were expelled from Egypt more than a thousand years earlier. They had identified Set with Baal, and it is likely that this identification with foreign rule, despite popularity with the Ramessids some hundreds of years later, led to his complete fall and thus the images we see at Edfu in a time of foreign occupation. I believe any "bad" elements of Set are from this later identification with foreigners, not from his original personality and purpose, to stand in the bow of the solar barque and repel Apophis. The story of the Contendings of Set and Horus, are, to me, an analogy of early Egyptian pre-history. If the differences between Set and Horus were so great, then why would Set have been, for a time, seen as equal to Horus, why the statue of Ramesses III being crowned by Horus and Set as equals..

Your contention that a family of "Setian" priests from Tanis came to power is wrong. I presume you mean the Ramessids. They certainly came from the Delta, but not Tanis, as that city was not built until Ramesses III became Pharaoh. The first Ramessid, Ramesses I was not a priest, he was a general, an old comrade of Horemheb. There is much more, but time is against me. In this affair an element is missed out, mostly because it is not understood. It is the second shrine of Tutankhamun dealing with the afterlife. It is not part of the Am-Duat as anybody understands it. It needs understanding before any modern person can say what AE really believes regards death and what may come after, and perhaps even the nature of gods.
My understanding is that unlike most rulers, when Alexander the Great took over a land he always allowed the original religions to remain, there is much history behind the cohabiting of Egyptian and Greek culture, I don't think Greece demonized any Egyptian deity.

Ramsesses IX was the last king to be buried in the Valley of the Kings in Thebes. His successors moved to a new city at Tanis in the Delta, which became the country's capital and main royal residence. Sety I., the second king of the nineteenth dynasty, the shepherd kings, derives his name from the god Seta sign of the high honor in which he was held among the shepherd kings; and indeed we are informed that they regarded Set, or Sutech, as the only true God, the sole deity, who alone was worthy of receiving divine honors.

I am certainly not an Egyptologist or historian, Egyptian history can be almost as confusing as Egyptian religion.
That all said, the point of the matter here is that the original Set / Har War personified principles that those of us on the Left Hand Path can relate to because we do not see the Prince of Darkness as the evil Beast 666 come to take your soul and destroy mankind or the archenemy of the Abrahamic god.

The monotheism of the Hyksos is probably the root of Moses's religion, what food for thought lies in the fact that the same awe of a fearful power that confronts us in life, changes among the Egyptians into the demonology of Set, and among the Israelites into the cult of Yahveh!

Tarkhem Productions
   IAMTHATIAMNOT

#880    Tutankhaten-pasheri

Tutankhaten-pasheri

    Buratinologist

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,637 posts
  • Joined:22 Sep 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:страна дураков

Posted 26 July 2013 - 10:20 PM

View PostEtu Malku, on 26 July 2013 - 09:59 PM, said:

what food for thought lies in the fact that the same awe of a fearful power that confronts us in life, changes among the Egyptians into the demonology of Set, and among the Israelites into the cult of Yahveh!
This I agree with completely.


#881    Ellapennella

Ellapennella

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,593 posts
  • Joined:28 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Female

Posted 12 August 2013 - 12:15 PM

View Postdanielost, on 26 July 2013 - 12:40 AM, said:

Yes, to ruke nature.  God gave us dominum(spch) over the beast, to do as we wished to do to them.  I think this was taken down a notc. or two after the flood.  When god put the fear of man into them.

.I see it differently than you do. I do not ,in no way see nature as something we are to rule over.I do not understand anyone that claims that   the source from the beginning told people to do whatever they wish to do with nature, to rule it. We are all nature,all is nature, and we are to live in harmony with nature...


#882    Etu Malku

Etu Malku

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts
  • Joined:03 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 August 2013 - 11:06 PM

View PostReann, on 12 August 2013 - 12:15 PM, said:

.I see it differently than you do. I do not ,in no way see nature as something we are to rule over.I do not understand anyone that claims that   the source from the beginning told people to do whatever they wish to do with nature, to rule it. We are all nature,all is nature, and we are to live in harmony with nature...
Well . . . this I do agree with you on and if I may add . . . If only Mankind 'could' be as fierce as Nature! Nature is the 'Cause & Affect' of the Laws of the Universe - Physics as we know it . . . most people attach an external God to this, and this is incorrect.

Tarkhem Productions
   IAMTHATIAMNOT

#883    Ellapennella

Ellapennella

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,593 posts
  • Joined:28 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Female

Posted 14 August 2013 - 01:49 PM

Hi Etu Malku
Yes, we both agree on that. I've come across something , something new to me. I was watching something where the Vatican actually sang in Latin an invocation to Lucifer.They actually sang of him, calling him the father of Christ.
Afterwards I came across this man named Zen Garcia who has compiled numerous amounts of literature that are old which clearly suggest   that Lucifer was actually known as the father of all , the one who impregnated Adams wife in the beginning.
Other literature this man has found reads the same in context to Mary, as Joesph suggests that the same has happened to him that has happened to Adam , both wives were virgins according to the old text.
Whether or not these stories are true or are just myths the fact is that they existed but were totally taken out from the biblical texts. What puzzles me is that the catholic church acknowledged it openly  during Easter Vigil.


#884    Mikko-kun

Mikko-kun

    Drifter

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,970 posts
  • Joined:27 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Outdoors

  • How much do you don't see?

Posted 14 August 2013 - 08:13 PM

View PostEtu Malku, on 13 August 2013 - 11:06 PM, said:

Well . . . this I do agree with you on and if I may add . . . If only Mankind 'could' be as fierce as Nature! Nature is the 'Cause & Affect' of the Laws of the Universe - Physics as we know it . . . most people attach an external God to this, and this is incorrect.

Well, if you'd be asked are bacterias inside us external from us or parts of us, I'd be in a bit of a loss, because they're basically regularly habiting us. You'd think it might be more like that? Because I've heard from very different sources about this god that's everywhere, but we still seem to be entities of our own in a sense.

Wherever there's a problem, there's solutions.
Answers are found from a wide deep perspective, from opened mind's eyes.
From where good and bad stay silent and you hear the real cause and effect, and big picture.
Giving up is wasting your time, but also necessary to find the true cause you didn't find yet.
Staying in the path is necessary only when there's trueness in that path.

#885    Ellapennella

Ellapennella

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 5,593 posts
  • Joined:28 Aug 2012
  • Gender:Female

Posted 15 August 2013 - 12:10 PM

View PostEtu Malku, on 13 August 2013 - 11:06 PM, said:

Well . . . this I do agree with you on and if I may add . . . If only Mankind 'could' be as fierce as Nature! Nature is the 'Cause & Affect' of the Laws of the Universe - Physics as we know it . . . most people attach an external God to this, and this is incorrect.
But we are  completely of Natural Nature .I see our participation in  cause and effect all of the time , as  thoughts and emotions  have karma attachments , there's no escaping karma, and i do think all nature is effected in someway over time by what has  been taken for granted and misunderstood for far too long.

I understand nature as a mystery , something more than just material to sight . I do understand and relate  a spirit  within all of nature ,  within the entire  the universe, unseen in ways ,but able to relate and be known, but will always a mystery..I don't understand the entirety of it's being, other than it is  and that all nature are all connected because of it.

As to how fierce of an impact we can achieve, I do think that if we can achieve the very best , but we have to come to the realization of something....





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users