Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

Zimmerman trial


  • Please log in to reply
1449 replies to this topic

#1    docyabut2

docyabut2

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,401 posts
  • Joined:12 Aug 2011

Posted 30 May 2013 - 02:45 AM

http://www.hlntv.com...-zimmerman-case


Lets hope this case is settle and does not divide people. I see it as Zimmwerman had no busiess chasing Trayvon ,but it  does depend in who attacked who frist in this crime.Block watchers should be wearing something to identity who they are to a person.Trayvon didn`t know who this guy was chasing him and may have decided to fight like most people would do. I just hope there is a fair justice for Trayvon`s family and Zimmwerman.


#2    Aaronsmom

Aaronsmom

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 643 posts
  • Joined:11 May 2011
  • Gender:Female

Posted 30 May 2013 - 08:18 AM

I am nearly 100% sure this trial WILL divide people; the death of Trayvon has already divided people, rather starkly, so I can't think why the trial would not amplify the divide. It does seem as though the majority of public opinion is sympathetic to the dead teenager and his family, and do believe Zimmerman ought to do some jail time. But Zimmerman has his supporters, no question about it, and many of them feel quite passionate. I think Zimmerman's biggest problem is that 911 tape that records him being told by the 911 operator the police don't want him following the unidentified person, but wait for LE to get there. Then, against explicit instructions, he follows Trayvon in his vehicle, then gets out of the vehicle to confront (assault?) Trayvon. A violent scuffle ensues and results in Trayvon getting shot to death. Zimmerman says he didn't know Tray was unarmed, but lots of people, including me, suspect he's not being truthful. If GZ really thought Trayvon likely had a gun, I seriously doubt he would have done something so bold as to confront TM face-to-face, especially knowing the police were on the way. I think it's much more likely that GZ was emboldened by a high degree of confidence that TM was NOT armed. His self-defense claim seems very flimsy. Yes, he got scrapes or cuts on his head that bled plenty... But that shouldn't be a surprise since he engaged in a scuffle with TM. It's hard to get around the known fact that GZ followed TM in his truck (after being instructed NOT to do so), stopped the car, got out and approached TM with a weapon on his person. I would say most people see GZ as the aggressor. That's a big problem for him IMO.


#3    Detective Mystery 2014

Detective Mystery 2014

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,300 posts
  • Joined:31 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:twilight zone's outer limits

  • Mysteries are tomorrow's histories.

Posted 31 May 2013 - 03:02 AM

I just hope that it's a fair, honest trial on both sides: defense and prosecution. Make it as clinical as possible. Deliver the facts in an objective way, as they've been contaminated by a dishonest media (agenda-driven personalities, doctoring of cell phone messages, outdated photographs, unconfirmed portrayals of both individuals). I suppose that it's too much to wish for a trial that's not hijacked by ideologues of all stripes.

There is one reality with billions of versions.

#4    regi

regi

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,281 posts
  • Joined:28 May 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Texas

Posted 10 June 2013 - 12:42 PM

Jury selection begins today.


#5    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 13,641 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • Because what came before never seems enough...

Posted 10 June 2013 - 02:00 PM

If the jury is empanelled in Sanford then I think Z has no chance.  If it is done anywhere else and there are more than half blacks sitting then it will be hung.  I think the question here is not whether T would be alive today but for choices Z made.  The question is whether the laws of the state of Florida can justly settle this issue.  Z is NOT guilty of murder 2.  Maybe he is guilty of manslaughter, maybe.  So if a jury convicts him of murder 2 I will be shocked - and sickened - that a man can be convicted by the press now.

  We've cast the world, we've set the stage,
  for what could be, the darkest age...

#6    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 10,305 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queensland, Australia.

Posted 11 June 2013 - 12:56 AM

View Postand then, on 10 June 2013 - 02:00 PM, said:

If the jury is empanelled in Sanford then I think Z has no chance.  If it is done anywhere else and there are more than half blacks sitting then it will be hung.  I think the question here is not whether T would be alive today but for choices Z made.  The question is whether the laws of the state of Florida can justly settle this issue.  Z is NOT guilty of murder 2.  Maybe he is guilty of manslaughter, maybe.  So if a jury convicts him of murder 2 I will be shocked - and sickened - that a man can be convicted by the press now.
I think he'll get done for aggravated manslaughter (is that such a thing?) - basically he's guilty of putting himself in a position where he had to choose whether or not to kill T at the risk of his own life. If he'd had followed instructions there's IMO (and based on the media reports) a good chance of noone being dead today.

However, you're right he's being tried (and found guilty) by the media.
I'd not be surprised by him being found guilty of Murder 2 if I were you, America is a media-nation right now, people live, breathe and think media.

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#7    Zaphod222

Zaphod222

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,594 posts
  • Joined:05 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tokyo

  • When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.
    (Oscar Wilde)

Posted 11 June 2013 - 01:04 AM

My prediction is that he will be railroaded for reasons of political correctness.
Wait for it.

"The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible." (Salman Rushdie)

#8    docyabut2

docyabut2

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,401 posts
  • Joined:12 Aug 2011

Posted 11 June 2013 - 11:23 AM

From what I read the complex had many break ins and robberies, Z  as a block watch person had called the cops many times in the past,  but he said by the time the cops get there they always get away. He was trying to detain what he thought was a  suspicious person.  We have the same problem in our neighberhood letters warnings us of the many car and house break ins.One women was driving by her house when she saw some hooded kids black and white breaking into her other car, she yell at them and they dragged her out of her car, beat the hell out of her and got away, It was dark and she couldn`t identify them very well.She warned the neigherhood not to do what she did and don`t comfront them.  It is sad that  any inoccent kids or people black or white can`t walk the streets at night with out being under a suspicion.What Z did was wrong in trying to detain T and he should get the manslaughter charge, even though he may have been defending himself.


#9    xFelix

xFelix

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 653 posts
  • Joined:30 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida

  • Yea I'm Pagan, oh no!

Posted 11 June 2013 - 11:29 AM

Quote

Typically this would mean engaging in a highly reckless act that presents a substantial likelihood of causing death without regard for the consequences, but lack of actual intent to kill.
The "Depraved Mind" meaning behind the charge according to case law... Basically Murder in the 2nd degree is where you act reckless and someone dies... That's about as close of a description of what happened as you're going to get. An adults recklessly followed a teen around with a gun on himself and put himself in a situation where he had to use that gun on that teen.. People saying that the media has slammed the case shut on this man are ignoring the fact that he has admitted from his own mouth that he did this... The media isn't spinning what came out of his mouth.. He said he followed a teen, he said he confronted the teen, he said the teen asked what his problem was, he said "I don't have a problem" while reaching for his pocket, he said that lead to the teen striking him, he said he then shot the teen.... The media didn't make that up.... It came right from his mouth, with his lawyer sitting right next to him, in a live interview.. lol

I don't understand why people keep thinking he's innocent, when he has admitted to what he has done.. He's just trying to provide an excuse for his being reckless and killing someone's son.

View Postdocyabut2, on 11 June 2013 - 11:23 AM, said:

From what I read the complex had many break ins and robberies, Z  as a block watch person had called the cops many times in the past,  but he said by the time the cops get there they always get away. He was trying to detain what he thought was a  suspicious person.  We have the same problem in our neighberhood letters warnings us of the many car and house break ins.One women was driving by her house when she saw some hooded kids black and white breaking into her other car, she yell at them and they dragged her out of her car, beat the hell out of her and got away, It was dark and she couldn`t identify them very well.She warned the neigherhood not to do what she did and don`t comfront them.  It is sad that  any inoccent kids or people black or white can`t walk the streets at night with out being under a suspicion.What Z did was wrong in trying to detain T and he should get the manslaughter charge, even though he may have been defending himself.

In the State of Florida you can't detain anyone under citizen's arrest for anything less than a Felony. You also can't use physical force, they have to surrender... Now an Officer can do all those things... but not a citizen...

Edited by xFelix, 11 June 2013 - 11:34 AM.

My posts consist of my opinions, beliefs, and experiences, feel free to disagree in a respectful manner.

I have a right to my beleifs, just as you have a right to not agree with them.

So long as we respect each other's beliefs, we won't have a single problem.


#10    Myles

Myles

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,244 posts
  • Joined:08 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 June 2013 - 08:11 PM

View PostAaronsmom, on 30 May 2013 - 08:18 AM, said:

I think Zimmerman's biggest problem is that 911 tape that records him being told by the 911 operator the police don't want him following the unidentified person, but wait for LE to get there. Then, against explicit instructions,  the known fact that GZ followed TM in his truck (after being instructed NOT to do so), stopped the car, got out and approached TM with a weapon on his person. I would say most people see GZ as the aggressor. That's a big problem for him IMO.

You should research before posting false information.
When the operator said "we don't need you to do that", it is not the same as what you said - "the police don't want him following the unidentified person".  Then you called them "explicit instructions". (def.fully revealed or expressed without vagueness, implication, or ambiguity : leaving no question).    After hearing the tape, the operator did not seem to instruct with authority at all.


#11    regi

regi

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,281 posts
  • Joined:28 May 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Texas

Posted 13 June 2013 - 02:01 PM

Regardless of what the operator indicated to Zimmerman, Zimmerman had already followed. He admitted as much, and we know he did, anyway.

The point is, he exited his vehicle. That's not what I consider reasonable given the circumstances that Zimmerman himself provided. He'd reported that Martin was "real suspicious"... that he was "on drugs or something"..."coming to check me out". He implied that Martin might have a weapon, and yet he still exited his vehicle to follow.

Edited by regi, 13 June 2013 - 02:23 PM.


#12    Myles

Myles

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,244 posts
  • Joined:08 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 June 2013 - 02:35 PM

View Postregi, on 13 June 2013 - 02:01 PM, said:

Regardless of what the operator indicated to Zimmerman, Zimmerman had already followed. He admitted as much, and we know he did, anyway.

The point is, he exited his vehicle. That's not what I consider reasonable given the circumstances that Zimmerman himself provided. He'd reported that Martin was "real suspicious"... that he was "on drugs or something"..."coming to check me out". He implied that Martin might have a weapon, and yet he still exited his vehicle to follow.

I would have done the same thing.   It seems Trayvon decided to attack George.


#13    regi

regi

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,281 posts
  • Joined:28 May 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Texas

Posted 13 June 2013 - 03:56 PM

View PostMyles, on 13 June 2013 - 02:35 PM, said:

I would have done the same thing.

(I think it's more productive to focus on one point at a time.)

Despite your apparent knowledge that you "would have done the same thing", I don't find it to be a reasonable action for anyone other than law enforcement.


#14    Myles

Myles

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,244 posts
  • Joined:08 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 June 2013 - 04:11 PM

View Postregi, on 13 June 2013 - 03:56 PM, said:

(I think it's more productive to focus on one point at a time.)

Despite your apparent knowledge that you "would have done the same thing", I don't find it to be a reasonable action for anyone other than law enforcement.

I disagree because of the word "reasonable".   If my neighborhood had been having a rash of robberies by young black men, and they have been getting away before the cops show up, I think it is reasonable that a neighborhood watch person would follow a strange young black man who is walking between houses and acting suspicious.   He also called the cops to report it.   Maybe not the most wise decision to follow, but it seams reasonable to me.


#15    Aaronsmom

Aaronsmom

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 643 posts
  • Joined:11 May 2011
  • Gender:Female

Posted 13 June 2013 - 05:01 PM

I don't feel a need to challenge any of your sadly revealing remarks, Myles. You make your bias and attitude crystal clear. Actually, I'm glad you shared your views--as nauseating as they are--because you prove in bold type my original observation that this crime has already starkly divided people in this country. Tragically, the divide is along racial lines of course. White racists will undoubtedly get behind the argument of self-defense...will even embrace George Zimmerman as a hero. The rest of the population can see how wrong and ill-advised Zimmerman's series of choices and actions were the night Martin died. Most of this sector is fairly confident of the motive, too. Racism. You can parse words with me, Myles, if you choose. It doesn't make your attitude more solvent or any less transparent. I won't concern myself with the opinions of an ignorant racist (and that includes all of them).





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users