Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Australia takes Japan to court over whaling


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 13,208 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 30 May 2013 - 03:49 AM

From June 26 to July 6 2013 one of the most intriguing environmental court cases in years will be heard by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague. Australia has taken Japan to court over whaling in the Southern Ocean.

In May 2010 Australia filed an application at the International Court of Justice to commence proceedings against Japan in relation to Japan’s program of “scientific whaling”, JARPA II.
Australia wants the court to declare that Japan is in breach of its international obligations under the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW).

Specifically, in its deposition to the court, Australia contends that Japan “has breached and is continuing to breach” its obligations under the international convention. The obligations are “to observe in good faith the zero catch limit allocated to the killing of whales for commercial purposes; and its obligation to act in good faith to refrain from participating in commercial whaling of humpback and fin whales in the Southern Ocean Sanctuary”.

Australia has further asserted that Japan has refused to accept recommendations of the International Whaling Commission (IWC, established under the convention) to protect whale stock for future generations and recommendations to not proceed with JARPA II. Australia also argues that these matters are not able to be resolved in the International Whaling Commission.

http://theconversati...re-to-now-13481

"The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the Legislature.  The Executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question" ~ James Madison
"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

#2    psyche101

psyche101

    The Customer.

  • Member
  • 35,142 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 30 May 2013 - 05:20 AM

So after more than a decade of throwing stinky butter at the Japanese, we are almost back where we were in 1986? With the help of the Greenpeace surveillance operation that uncovered whale meat in restaurants, they might even have a chance of getting somewhere. Thank's GREENPEACE.

This is what I have been saying all along. Pirates wont stop the Whaling, a table will.

Embarrassing that yet again, New Zealand is showing us Aussies up. I'd move there if the pay was better.

New Zealand’s intervention centres, among other things, on the argument that a Special Permit to kill whales can only be given if killing is for scientific research, the killing is necessary and proportionate to the outcomes of the research, and it will have no negative effect on whale stocks. In addition, Japan has discharged its duty of cooperation with the Scientific Committee and the whaling commission.

New Zealand argues that issuing a Special Permit for JARPA II doesn’t meet these requirements and therefore that permits should be prohibited.


Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#3    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 13,208 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 30 May 2013 - 07:11 AM

Not sure how a restaurant table is going to stop whaling when Japan consumes thousands of tons of whale meat every year.  Who is denying that and what difference would documenting it make?  Japan isn't even denying it, so what's the point?

"The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the Legislature.  The Executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question" ~ James Madison
"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

#4    psyche101

psyche101

    The Customer.

  • Member
  • 35,142 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 30 May 2013 - 07:50 AM

View PostYamato, on 30 May 2013 - 07:11 AM, said:

Not sure how a restaurant table is going to stop whaling when Japan consumes thousands of tons of whale meat every year.  Who is denying that and what difference would documenting it make?  Japan isn't even denying it, so what's the point?

Bloody hell, you do not know what is going on at all do you? You really ought to give up on Whale Wars and try reading. Yes Japan is denying it, that is how they maintain the loophole!

Japan is not allowed to kill Whales for Commercial consumption, That is the loophole they are exploiting. The meat GREENPEACE found in restaurants can only have come from the hunt. That PROVES the hunt is not dedicated to scientific purposes, effectively turning the loophole into a hangman's noose. BAM goodbye excuse, goodbye whaling, hello International lawsuit.

Edited by psyche101, 30 May 2013 - 07:51 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#5    psyche101

psyche101

    The Customer.

  • Member
  • 35,142 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 30 May 2013 - 07:52 AM

Hey Yam, remember me offering you this?


From Wikipedia:

When the commercial whaling moratorium was introduced by the IWC in 1982, Japan lodged an official objection. However, in response to US threats to cut Japan's fishing quota in US territorial waters under the terms of the Packwood-Magnuson Amendment, Japan withdrew its objection in 1987. According to the BBC, America went back on this promise, effectively destroying the deal.[20] Since Japan could not resume commercial whaling, it began whaling on a scientific-research basis. Australia, Greenpeace, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and other groups dispute the Japanese claim of research "as a disguise for commercial whaling, which is banned."


Now do you understand why the efforts of GREENPEACE are crucial?

Edited by psyche101, 30 May 2013 - 07:53 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#6    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 13,208 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 30 May 2013 - 09:34 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 30 May 2013 - 07:52 AM, said:

Hey Yam, remember me offering you this?


From Wikipedia:

When the commercial whaling moratorium was introduced by the IWC in 1982, Japan lodged an official objection. However, in response to US threats to cut Japan's fishing quota in US territorial waters under the terms of the Packwood-Magnuson Amendment, Japan withdrew its objection in 1987. According to the BBC, America went back on this promise, effectively destroying the deal.[20] Since Japan could not resume commercial whaling, it began whaling on a scientific-research basis. Australia, Greenpeace, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and other groups dispute the Japanese claim of research "as a disguise for commercial whaling, which is banned."


Now do you understand why the efforts of GREENPEACE are crucial?
US threats to cut Japan's fishing quotas in US territorial waters is what "cheesed them off"?   That would be par for their course of not respecting territories and sanctuaries that they're still having to be dealt with legally for violating.   But appeasement is tantamount to impotence.  There's a word for one who's afraid of confrontation because they might anger who they disagree with:  Victim.

Even if I did have disagreements about the efforts of Greenpeace (like?) that would be no excuse to launch into abusive tirades against you or any other poster on this message board.

"The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the Legislature.  The Executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question" ~ James Madison
"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

#7    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 13,208 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 30 May 2013 - 09:40 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 30 May 2013 - 07:50 AM, said:

Bloody hell, you do not know what is going on at all do you? You really ought to give up on Whale Wars and try reading. Yes Japan is denying it, that is how they maintain the loophole!

Japan is not allowed to kill Whales for Commercial consumption, That is the loophole they are exploiting. The meat GREENPEACE found in restaurants can only have come from the hunt. That PROVES the hunt is not dedicated to scientific purposes, effectively turning the loophole into a hangman's noose. BAM goodbye excuse, goodbye whaling, hello International lawsuit.
You're sprinkling baseless claims with factoids and trying to convince me of what I already know plus your opinion.  

Show me the evidence that Japan is denying it consumes whale meat.  I'd love to see the Japanese BS posted from you of all people.   Let's explore their denials right here on this thread.  Good luck.

"The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the Legislature.  The Executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question" ~ James Madison
"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

#8    Cerbero

Cerbero

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 63 posts
  • Joined:03 Feb 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima - PERU

Posted 30 May 2013 - 02:02 PM

I just wanna add that the Japanese are not stoping, they have an obsession with whale meat, I don´t know why... its supposed they´re and advanced and modern society in its own terms, but I doubt they will ever stop, if whaling is forbidden that would just increase the price, can´t they live happy with just chicken and fish?
in my country fishermen have understood in large proportions about stopping killing dolphins, smal whales and even some species of octopus and shrimp, but that´s because we were never a society so obsessed in eating them, the Japanese are a whole different breed in those matters


#9    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 13,208 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 30 May 2013 - 11:40 PM

View PostCerbero, on 30 May 2013 - 02:02 PM, said:

I just wanna add that the Japanese are not stoping, they have an obsession with whale meat, I don´t know why... its supposed they´re and advanced and modern society in its own terms, but I doubt they will ever stop, if whaling is forbidden that would just increase the price, can´t they live happy with just chicken and fish?
in my country fishermen have understood in large proportions about stopping killing dolphins, smal whales and even some species of octopus and shrimp, but that´s because we were never a society so obsessed in eating them, the Japanese are a whole different breed in those matters
If the court rules against Japan this July and they continue to break the law anyway, what's the next step?   Some have suggested that an escort out of the Sanctuary via naval frigate would be an "act of war" which means that Russia and the US are at war and we don't even know it.  

Our dying oceans are about more than just whales and dolphins, they also include fish stocks being rapidly extinguished by modern technology that's pulling out mass quantities of fish many times faster than the oceans can replenish them.   Tens of millions of sharks are being slaughtered every year, often for nothing more than their fins and they're thrown back into the oceans without their fins to die slow deaths before they drown.  The Bluefin Tuna is the fastest fish in the sea and it's going extinct.   Mitsubishi is warehousing Bluefin in gigantic freezers investing in the economics of extinction, essentially investing in these creatures as commodities with exponential increases in value due to their growing scarcity.   It was hard to believe that a single tuna would be worth a million dollars as Paul Watson claimed several years ago, and then I saw an article a few years ago about a tuna in Japan pulling in close to a half a million dollars.   Investing in extinction is so profitable nothing else even comes close.

I just did some homework and just realized that the million dollar mark for a single tuna fish has already been trounced:
http://www.bbc.co.uk...d-asia-20919306

"The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the Legislature.  The Executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question" ~ James Madison
"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

#10    psyche101

psyche101

    The Customer.

  • Member
  • 35,142 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 31 May 2013 - 12:52 AM

View PostYamato, on 30 May 2013 - 09:34 AM, said:

US threats to cut Japan's fishing quotas in US territorial waters is what "cheesed them off"?   That would be par for their course of not respecting territories and sanctuaries that they're still having to be dealt with legally for violating.  

Par for the course? Even though the US did it to Japan first huh? And you are OK with that are you?

I have given you this link before, I doubt very much that you read it, I urge you to do so this time and make yourself more aware of the situation between the US and Japan and the tentions that arose at the time of the moratorium initiation.


LINK - Did Greens help kill the whale?

Do you understand why the efforts of GREEPEACE are moe crucial now than ever? Do you now realise this careful planned non violent data gather might be the best shot at ending whaling? Japan signed an International treaty, it's on paper mate. Scientific Purposes. Much more effective than 1,000 cakes of stinky butter.

View PostYamato, on 30 May 2013 - 09:34 AM, said:

But appeasement is tantamount to impotence.  There's a word for one who's afraid of confrontation because they might anger who they disagree with:  Victim.

If you are so happy with the Sea Shepherd tactics, then you ought to be very proud of Japan. The Sea Shepherd band of pirates come terrorists are saying "you canot take whales from a sanctuary" well the US said to Japan We are taking away your right to fish in northern waters. The Japanese stood up to the bullying the US did to them just like the Sea Shepherd is supposedly standing up to the Japanse.

Why is nobody protesting to reinstate the original agrement, name and shame the US, and asking Japan to go back to their agreement of no whaling??????? Why throw stinky butter at them instead???

How is that not a fair proposal?

View PostYamato, on 30 May 2013 - 09:34 AM, said:

Even if I did have disagreements about the efforts of Greenpeace (like?) that would be no excuse to launch into abusive tirades against you or any other poster on this message board.

Like? You say they are useless rainbow chasing hippies that do nothing. Want some quotes?

If you consider the above abusive, you have more problems than just me mate. Your behaviour was unwarranted in the other thread, and it is my opinion that you created any animosity existing in these discussions.

Edited by psyche101, 31 May 2013 - 01:01 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#11    psyche101

psyche101

    The Customer.

  • Member
  • 35,142 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 31 May 2013 - 12:57 AM

View PostCerbero, on 30 May 2013 - 02:02 PM, said:

I just wanna add that the Japanese are not stoping, they have an obsession with whale meat, I don´t know why... its supposed they´re and advanced and modern society in its own terms, but I doubt they will ever stop, if whaling is forbidden that would just increase the price, can´t they live happy with just chicken and fish?
in my country fishermen have understood in large proportions about stopping killing dolphins, smal whales and even some species of octopus and shrimp, but that´s because we were never a society so obsessed in eating them, the Japanese are a whole different breed in those matters

That is a very ignorant statement and stereotyping an entire nation. Most Japanese people do not support commercial whaling. Much of what they know just comes from their own papers, just like Western society. It's a political debate more than anything, and the link in the above post explains how tis situation actually came about.




Are the Japanese Diehards for Whaling?

To put things in perspective, Japanese people today do not actually consume all that much whale meat. According to a 2006 Gallup poll conducted by the Nippon Research Center and commissioned by Greenpeace, 95 percent of the population reportedly had not eaten whale meat in a long time, ate whale meat very rarely, or ate it not at all. It seems, however, many Japanese are rather concerned about their traditional right to eat whale meat, regardless of whether they plan on dining on it themselves. It was an important food staple during and after World War II, and remains a sentimental favorite among people who lived through that era. There are also occasional accusations that the West is indulging in culinary snobbery and should butt out when it comes to the cuisine served up in Japanese kitchens.
It does appear that many Japanese people are largely unconcerned by the idea of whaling, in part because whaling and other fisheries are said to form a long-standing tradition for the island nation. Since these practices go back several hundred or even several thousand years, many claim they're culturally justified. One small study collected in a work edited by Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek and Jennifer W. Jay verified this position. Respondents were adamant that whaling was a custom and a right, and should continue as long as whale populations remain stable — although an earlier similar study apparently found less enthusiasm.
However, it is possible that positive feelings toward whaling have more basis in the present than in the past. For many Japanese, exposure to the practice comes mainly in the form of newspaper articles and other forms of mass media that are critical of anti-whaling efforts, something that could fuel the defensive attitude.


LINK

Edited by psyche101, 31 May 2013 - 12:58 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#12    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 13,208 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 31 May 2013 - 03:38 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 31 May 2013 - 12:52 AM, said:

Par for the course? Even though the US did it to Japan first huh? And you are OK with that are you?

I have given you this link before, I doubt very much that you read it, I urge you to do so this time and make yourself more aware of the situation between the US and Japan and the tentions that arose at the time of the moratorium initiation.


LINK - Did Greens help kill the whale?

Do you understand why the efforts of GREEPEACE are moe crucial now than ever? Do you now realise this careful planned non violent data gather might be the best shot at ending whaling? Japan signed an International treaty, it's on paper mate. Scientific Purposes. Much more effective than 1,000 cakes of stinky butter.



If you are so happy with the Sea Shepherd tactics, then you ought to be very proud of Japan. The Sea Shepherd band of pirates come terrorists are saying "you canot take whales from a sanctuary" well the US said to Japan We are taking away your right to fish in northern waters. The Japanese stood up to the bullying the US did to them just like the Sea Shepherd is supposedly standing up to the Japanse.

Why is nobody protesting to reinstate the original agrement, name and shame the US, and asking Japan to go back to their agreement of no whaling??????? Why throw stinky butter at them instead???

How is that not a fair proposal?



Like? You say they are useless rainbow chasing hippies that do nothing. Want some quotes?

If you consider the above abusive, you have more problems than just me mate. Your behaviour was unwarranted in the other thread, and it is my opinion that you created any animosity existing in these discussions.
Why is nobody protesting to reinstate the original agreement?   Is Sea Shepherd the only one that can do that, too?   They're busy enough already on the meager budget they have.

Listen pal, you support the tactics that you think are effective and I'll support the tactics that I think are effective, and we can leave all this type-A banter and personal assault out in the street where it belongs.  Alright?   It's a PITA for moderators to have to come here and clean up after the messes of immature people who either can't (or for whatever reason, won't) get along.   If you can act civil then I'll be more than happy to discuss anything related to Australia taking Japan to court in this thread.

So they were offended by the Moratorium and their emotional sense of being offended was why they started whaling again?   That's a nice theory, but  where's the evidence?   You're citing an op-ed blaming "the Greens" which in this case isn't the party but all environmentalists of the day who weighed in on this issue and played a part in putting diplomatic pressure to instate the moratorium.   And at the same time you keep touting Greenpeace.  That is not a position that's square with itself.   It isn't Sea Shepherd's fault that the moratorium was enacted any more than it's Greenpeace's, so that's not a reason to flame Sea Shepherd to the exclusion of other organizations involved in this issue in the 1960s-1980s.

An op-ed vaguely referring to some "theory" without any citations or references doesn't nullify anything I've said yet, and I don't see any evidence for this "theory" either.   I don't see the bureaucrats from the Japanese government, past or present, who make the decisions about this issue citing their "hurt feelings" as the reason they're going to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to go thousands of miles away from Japan into a whale sanctuary and the most dangerous ocean on the planet to find some whales to kill.  Their reasons for doing this every year since the moratorium began are economic reasons, not emotional ones.  They had from 1986-2003 to stop whaling unilaterally after their feelings were repaired, the whole time Sea Shepherd was nowhere in sight.   So I'm not going to agree with this "theory" when the facts and the history of Japanese whaling disprove it.

"The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the Legislature.  The Executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question" ~ James Madison
"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

#13    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 13,208 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 31 May 2013 - 03:53 AM

I can state my opinions about Greenpeace even if they're negative opinions.  That's not a TOS violation.   What I can't do is berate and assault and abuse other posters who might happen to disagree with me about Greenpeace.  And I'm not going to cut and paste examples of this from other threads and pollute this one with more of the same, because we can't remember what we said from a day ago.

Let's let Saru use his time to do more important work than having to babysit us.  Alright?    I'm better than that, and I think you are too psyche101.

"The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the Legislature.  The Executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question" ~ James Madison
"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

#14    psyche101

psyche101

    The Customer.

  • Member
  • 35,142 posts
  • Joined:30 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oz

  • If you stop to think, Remember to start again

Posted 31 May 2013 - 04:54 AM

View PostYamato, on 31 May 2013 - 03:38 AM, said:

Why is nobody protesting to reinstate the original agreement?   Is Sea Shepherd the only one that can do that, too?   They're busy enough already on the meager budget they have.

I'd rather the Sea Shepherd just go away. We do not want their help. As it was put earlier they suck at it. The millions they get are not well spent.

You are not getting it , that was a general question. I would never expect Watson to be that clever or intuitive. I realise that is simply too much of an ask.

View PostYamato, on 31 May 2013 - 03:38 AM, said:

Listen pal, you support the tactics that you think are effective and I'll support the tactics that I think are effective, and we can leave all this type-A banter and personal assault out in the street where it belongs.  Alright?   It's a PITA for moderators to have to come here and clean up after the messes of immature people who either can't (or for whatever reason, won't) get along.   If you can act civil then I'll be more than happy to discuss anything related to Australia taking Japan to court in this thread.

That is not why we are here, this is a discussion forum, not a p***ing contest about who one should support. Facts are Watsons band of pirates do not help, we Aussies do not want them here and they hinder efforts to stop whaling altogether. They aggravate the situation which ensures a more agressive approach by Japan. That much is fact. The International Whaling Commission do not want them here, we do not want them here, nobody wants them here. Take the hint and move on Sea Shepherd. There are many marine crisis happening, dont feel obligated to feel responsible for Southern Ocean Whaling. Go find another crusade. Surely there is something in Canada that lot could be tackling.

What mods have cleaned up anything? Your making stuff up again Yam.

View PostYamato, on 31 May 2013 - 03:38 AM, said:

So they were offended by the Moratorium and their emotional sense of being offended was why they started whaling again?   That's a nice theory, but  where's the evidence?   You're citing an op-ed blaming "the Greens" which in this case isn't the party but all environmentalists of the day who weighed in on this issue and played a part in putting diplomatic pressure to instate the moratorium.   And at the same time you keep touting Greenpeace.  That is not a position that's square with itself.   It isn't Sea Shepherd's fault that the moratorium was enacted any more than it's Greenpeace's, so that's not a reason to flame Sea Shepherd to the exclusion of other organizations involved in this issue in the 1960s-1980s.

Their main food source was put under Quota by the US. How does the US have the right to do that? Look at Japan, hardly a wide farming expanse is it? You are messing with the culture of a nation that outlives America altogether. The evidence was in the link, did you not read it yet again? I have given it to you what 4 or 5 times now?

Yes it is stating all the Greens made the situation as bad as it is, and now the Sea Shepherd open that would gain every year! That is the point, we have already made such dumb mistakes, but Watson just keep rammin his head into the wall time and again. And he is duping people onto thinking he is doing something worthwhile so he can promote his TV show. It's not the Sea Shepherd's Fault that Japan is whaling, it's their fault they continue to whale aggressively. They are not heling. Arrogance and bullying the Japanese started this mess, and that is what Watson continues to do each and every year.


View PostYamato, on 31 May 2013 - 03:38 AM, said:

An op-ed vaguely referring to some "theory" without any citations or references doesn't nullify anything I've said yet, and I don't see any evidence for this "theory" either.   I don't see the bureaucrats from the Japanese government, past or present, who make the decisions about this issue citing their "hurt feelings" as the reason they're going to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to go thousands of miles away from Japan into a whale sanctuary and the most dangerous ocean on the planet to find some whales to kill.  Their reasons for doing this every year since the moratorium began are economic reasons, not emotional ones.  They had from 1986-2003 to stop whaling unilaterally after their feelings were repaired, the whole time Sea Shepherd was nowhere in sight.   So I'm not going to agree with this "theory" when the facts and the history of Japanese whaling disprove it.

Then you did not read the link did you? You missed this part:


Posted Image Why did America have to cheat us like that? Posted Image
Shigeko Misaki


Economic reasons? Like how they had such an excess of whale meat that they had to give it away as school lunches? Or the never ending cost of repairs to damage by Pirates like Watson? Or the Extensive representation in International Courts? Or the money expended to become part of the IWC?


Mate, you have got to be kidding me! One Sony factory probably injects more into the Japanese economy!! If it is economy, why were the US so mad at Japan that they openly smashed electronic Japanese goods like toasters? - go back and read the link to find out.

Their feelings were never repaired. How do you come to that conclusion? You just want to demonise the Japanese.





View PostYamato, on 31 May 2013 - 03:53 AM, said:

I can state my opinions about Greenpeace even if they're negative opinions.  That's not a TOS violation.   What I can't do is berate and assault and abuse other posters who might happen to disagree with me about Greenpeace.  And I'm not going to cut and paste examples of this from other threads and pollute this one with more of the same, because we can't remember what we said from a day ago.

Let's let Saru use his time to do more important work than having to babysit us.  Alright? I'm better than that, and I think you are too psyche101.

Cannot say I have seen, nor bothered Saru. Don't see the need.
You get what you give Yam. Have a look in the mirror and get back to me on that one.
Ohh yeah, and don't Listen Pal me. OK.

Edited by psyche101, 31 May 2013 - 05:04 AM.

Things are what they are. - Me Reality can't be debunked. That's the beauty of it. - Capeo If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. - Sir Isaac Newton Let me repeat the lesson learned from the Sturrock scientific review panel: Pack up your old data and forget it. Ufology needs new data, new cases, new rigorous and scientific methodologies if it hopes ever to get out of its pit. - Ed Stewart Youtube is the last refuge of the ignorant and is more often used for disinformation than genuine research.  There is a REASON for PEER REVIEW... - Chrlzs Nothing is inexplicable, just unexplained. - Dr Who

#15    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 13,208 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 31 May 2013 - 05:37 AM

View Postpsyche101, on 31 May 2013 - 04:54 AM, said:

I'd rather the Sea Shepherd just go away. We do not want their help. As it was put earlier they suck at it. The millions they get are not well spent.

You are not getting it , that was a general question. I would never expect Watson to be that clever or intuitive. I realise that is simply too much of an ask.



That is not why we are here, this is a discussion forum, not a p***ing contest about who one should support. Facts are Watsons band of pirates do not help, we Aussies do not want them here and they hinder efforts to stop whaling altogether. They aggravate the situation which ensures a more agressive approach by Japan. That much is fact. The International Whaling Commission do not want them here, we do not want them here, nobody wants them here. Take the hint and move on Sea Shepherd. There are many marine crisis happening, dont feel obligated to feel responsible for Southern Ocean Whaling. Go find another crusade. Surely there is something in Canada that lot could be tackling.

What mods have cleaned up anything? Your making stuff up again Yam.



Their main food source was put under Quota by the US. How does the US have the right to do that? Look at Japan, hardly a wide farming expanse is it? You are messing with the culture of a nation that outlives America altogether. The evidence was in the link, did you not read it yet again? I have given it to you what 4 or 5 times now?

Yes it is stating all the Greens made the situation as bad as it is, and now the Sea Shepherd open that would gain every year! That is the point, we have already made such dumb mistakes, but Watson just keep rammin his head into the wall time and again. And he is duping people onto thinking he is doing something worthwhile so he can promote his TV show. It's not the Sea Shepherd's Fault that Japan is whaling, it's their fault they continue to whale aggressively. They are not heling. Arrogance and bullying the Japanese started this mess, and that is what Watson continues to do each and every year.




Then you did not read the link did you? You missed this part:


Posted Image Why did America have to cheat us like that? Posted Image
Shigeko Misaki


Economic reasons? Like how they had such an excess of whale meat that they had to give it away as school lunches? Or the never ending cost of repairs to damage by Pirates like Watson? Or the Extensive representation in International Courts? Or the money expended to become part of the IWC?


Mate, you have got to be kidding me! One Sony factory probably injects more into the Japanese economy!! If it is economy, why were the US so mad at Japan that they openly smashed electronic Japanese goods like toasters? - go back and read the link to find out.

Their feelings were never repaired. How do you come to that conclusion? You just want to demonise the Japanese.







Cannot say I have seen, nor bothered Saru. Don't see the need.
You get what you give Yam. Have a look in the mirror and get back to me on that one.
Ohh yeah, and don't Listen Pal me. OK.
Yes, economic reasons.   They sell that poisonous meat before their people put it into their mouths.   But expecting any act of government bureaucracy to be efficient, sensible, solvent, logical, much less profitable is a fallacious premise on its face.  Japanese whalers of all people are the last people to make an exception out of.

You had no need to bother Saru but inadvertently did already anyway.   I had to ask you about five or six times prior to cease the personal attacks and that thread probably wouldn't be sitting idle right now otherwise.   Let's keep it on the level.  It's not that difficult.

I assign no blame to the US for "cheating" anyone "like that".   If we don't want you fishing in our waters, you best pack it up and ship it out.

I've already addressed coolguy when I said not to blame the Japanese people for any of this.  They are absolved, even the whale meat eaters, as I've already explained.   Repeating the same things over and over again here is not forwarding the discussion.

There was no evidence in that link that Japan was going to stop whaling, whatever that means.  That's almost 20 years before Sea Shepherd even engaged with a Japanese ship in the Southern Ocean so it's completely irrelevant to your lack of respect for the most successful marine conservationists of all time.

As for the rest of your response, it can be summarized by:

"They suck"
"Not clever or intuitive..."
"Do not help"
"Aussies don't want them there." (source, please).
"They aggravate the situation."
"The whaling bureau doesn't want them there." (like that's going to change my mind)
"Nobody wants them there." (obviously false).
"Take a hint." (I don't take hints, I just mind the facts, like the Japanese failure to make anywhere near even half of their own quota).

That's not going to change my mind.  If you want to be seen as credible on this issue at all, you need to provide alternatives.   And the only alternative you've provided is appeasement.   They had their appeasement from 1986-2003 and they couldn't dry their tears and pack their government fleet up and head home on their own.  They ran out of time and, too bad so sad, and Sea Shepherd arrived to start taking this bankrupt corrupt charade of an organization down.

"The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the Legislature.  The Executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question" ~ James Madison
"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users