Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 1 votes

When will our population hit crisis point ?


  • Please log in to reply
62 replies to this topic

#1    Saru

Saru

    Site Webmaster

  • 20,054 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2001
  • Gender:Male

  • "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious." - Albert Einstein

Posted 15 June 2013 - 10:41 AM

UN projections have predicted that the world's population will exceed 10 billion by the year 2100.

Guardian Unlimited said:

In the last two years, the phrase "10 billion" has come to stand for a supposed demographic crisis. In 2011, the UN projected that there will be 10 billion people living on the planet in 2100, and this has been perceived as unsustainable.

Posted Image Read more...



#2    freetoroam

freetoroam

    Honourary member of the UM asylum

  • Member
  • 7,454 posts
  • Joined:11 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:rivers and canals of England and Wales.

  • If you didn't see it with your own eyes, or hear it with your own ears, don't invent it with your small mind and share it with your big mouth!

Posted 15 June 2013 - 10:58 AM

Crisis point will be when everyone is eating GM foods because there is no fields left to grow anything, animals are kept in big warehouses fed whatever leftovers can be found and the cr&p they eat will effect the humans eating it.
Floods will be the norm because most of the land has been concreted to build high rise flats for the extra population and when there are no go areas because there just is not enough jobs and money to go round so the criminal gangs have taken over the neighborhood.
There will always be a divide, those who have and those who have not, but it will be far bigger.
Now the computer has halved the jobs, its seems people just want to double their families.....what sort of future does that hold when the human race has that sort of mentality?

In an ideal World a law would be passed were NO guns were allowed and all those out there destroyed, trouble is the law makers are not going to take a risk of trying to pass that without making sure they are armed first.

#3    Lilly

Lilly

    Forum Divinity

  • 16,396 posts
  • Joined:16 Apr 2004
  • Gender:Female

  • "To thine own self be true" William Shakespeare

Posted 15 June 2013 - 11:22 AM

Recently China has been criticized for strong population control laws. While I agree that some of their policies are less than stellar, I do think the main concept (too many people=misery for all) is sound. The author of this article isn't panicking about 10 billion and seems to be optimistic. Personally, I'm not all that convinced that population will stabelize easily...time will tell I guess.

"Ignorance is ignorance. It is a state of mind, not an opinion." ~MID~

Posted Image

#4    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 13,938 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • Because what came before never seems enough...

Posted 15 June 2013 - 11:41 AM

When we read predictions in the Bible of judgments that erase 2/3 of the population of the planet it seems horrific and horrifically unjust.  But imagine the survivor's possibilities.  Resources enough to begin again with a new mindset and with the scientific knowledge acquired by our predecessors.  Could it be that a near extermination event could possibly be a blessing in the long term?  Especially when that event seems inescapable because of our failed and rebellious natures?

  We've cast the world, we've set the stage,
  for what could be, the darkest age...

#5    Ashotep

Ashotep

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,448 posts
  • Joined:10 May 2011
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:USA

  • Courage is being scared to death but saddling up anyway-John Wayne

Posted 15 June 2013 - 12:16 PM

Water is a problem today in some areas of the world so I don't see how this planet will support 10 billion.  Some of the resources we depend on today such as oil is getting harder to find.  Try growing enough food for everyone without oil to run the machinery or water to irrigate those crops.  Hopefully some other form of energy will replace oil that is less polluting.

They are right the population isn't growing like it use to but I think that is mainly because white people aren't having kids like they use to.  White populations is actually in decline.  Other groups still have too many kids and are growing.


#6    Kowalski

Kowalski

    The Original Penguin Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • 4,102 posts
  • Joined:14 Mar 2013
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:* Madgascar *

  • It's All Some Kind Of Wacked Out Conspiracy....

Posted 15 June 2013 - 12:39 PM

We will never hit a "crisis point" in population. It's a myth, created by Thomas Malthus, and it is supported by the "elite" who think we, lowly commoners, should only have a certain number of kids, etc.

Link: http://www.overpopul...aking-of-a-myth

Quote


Did Malthus really say to kill off the poor?

Posted Image
Yep. In his Essay on the Principle of Population, Malthus calls for increased mortality among the poor:


All the children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons… To act consistently therefore, we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use. Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. (Book IV, Chap. V) — Read it online.


Back to top
Malthus thought doctors shouldn't cure diseases?

Posted Image


“But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases; and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders. (Book IV, Chap. V) — Read it online.”


Back to top
Did Paul Ehrlich really say that famines would devastate humanity in the 1970s?

Posted Image

Yep. In his 1968 work The Population Bomb, Ehrlich stated:


“The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s the world will undergo famines--hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.”


Back to top
What's the UNFPA? How do they profit from fear?

Posted Image
The United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA) was founded in 1969, the year after Ehrlich published The Population Bomb. They have been involved in programs with governments around the world who deny their women the right to choose the number and spacing of their children. Their complicit work with the infamous “one-child policy" mandated by the government of the People's Republic of China, uncovered by an investigation of the U.S. State Department in 2001, led the United States to pull its funding.
The wealthy of the West, in their terror of poverty, have given copiously to the UNFPA and its population control programs. Visit Population Research Institute for more info.

Back to top
No way everyone could fit in Texas …

Posted Image

According to the U.N. Population Database, the world's population in 2010 will be 6,908,688,000. The landmass of Texas is 268,820 sq mi (7,494,271,488,000 sq ft).
So, divide 7,494,271,488,000 sq ft by 6,908,688,000 people, and you get 1084.76 sq ft/person. That's approximately a 33' x 33' plot of land for every person on the planet, enough space for a town house.
Posted Image
Given an average four person family, every family would have a 66' x 66' plot of land, which would comfortably provide a single family home and yard -- and all of them fit on a landmass the size of Texas. Admittedly, it'd basically be one massive subdivision, but Texas is a tiny portion of the inhabitable Earth.
Posted Image

Such an arrangement would leave the entire rest of the world vacant. There's plenty of space for humanity.

Back to top
Where are you getting these numbers?

U.N. Population Database. While they provide Low, Medium, and High Variants, the Low Variant is the one that keeps coming true, so the Low variant numbers are the ones used in this video. Check their online database.
Posted Image
<a href="http://www.overpopulationisamyth.com/overpopulation-the-making-of-a-myth#toc">Back to top
The world's population will peak in 30 years? Prove it.

According to the U.N. Population Database, using the historically accurate low variant projection, the Earth's population will only add another billion people or so over the next thirty years, peaking around 8.02 billion people in the year 2040, and then it will begin to decline. Check their online database.

Link: http://www.christian...pulation-51113/

Quote


Perhaps one of the most persistent and pervasive myths that have shaped the thinking of many people and, subsequently, public policy is the myth that the world’s population is spiraling out of control and that it will ultimately lead to catastrophic shortages of the essential resources necessary to sustain life.

This whole concept of “overpopulation” can be traced to Thomas Malthus, the British scholar and Anglican clergyman (albeit a very misguided one) who, without any specific knowledge other than his own speculations, predicted in 1789 that the planet’s rapid increase in population would soon outstrip the planet’s ability to produce food, resulting in massive worldwide starvation. Malthus’s predicted famine never materialized, of course; he could not have predicted the industrial revolution or the enormous impact subsequent technological innovations would have on our ability to produce food. Recall that today our federal government actually pays farmers not to grow crops due to the abundance of food produced on considerably less farmland than existed just a century ago.
Even the United Nations, historically a rabid advocate of population control, has conceded that the world’s current infrastructure is capable of supporting a worldwide population of more than 9 billion people. Furthermore, according to the most recent estimates, the planet’s population will most likely continue to climb from its current level until 2050, when it will peak at 9 billion; other predictions have the world’s population peaking at 7.5 billion in 2040. In either case, global population levels will begin a sharp decline sometime during the middle of the twenty-first century. Present fertility rates actually indicate a massive underpopulation crisis is coming, particularly among Western nations.



#7    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,637 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 15 June 2013 - 01:42 PM

The fact that Malthus pointed out the problem and that he failed to spot the influence of cheap energy on our ability to support a burgeoning population doesn't mean that his central concept was in any way wrong. The fact that many of our elite have spotted the fundamental crisis which we face at least offers some hope that some of the strategic changes needed to bring us onto a sustainable footing could be made.
It would require a steady level of innovation comparable to the discovery of abundant oil to allow for a continued rise in population. Soil and water are the hidden variables which most people ignore and are already causing declines in agricultural productivity.

What predominently human centric analysis fails to account for is the effect of adding 3billion extra people to the world over the last 30 years has already caused. All ecosystems are under stress with average declines in biodiversity (numbers and species) in excess of 40% in most areas. We anticipate adding a further 3billion to the population by mid century and this will inevitably have an even greater effect on the integrity of the biosphere. We are part of the biosphere and depend on its health and integrity for most of our essential services such as water, soil, pollination, flood moderation, climate stability, etc, etc. Simply ignoring these aspects in saying that we have the human infrastructure to sustain those extra people shows a woeful and criminal lack of awareness of our relatively modest roll in the overall functioning of a healthy planet. We have lived and are living beyond our means and nature will withdraw things we take for granted for survival before we come to our senses. The Christian outlook is a flawed tool for analysing the state we are in because it doesn't value the critically important things in the world which without we cannot survive in any meaningful way - it offers a morally driven perspective which is fundamentally immoral in its disregard for the sanctity and essential needs of other forms of life.


Current population is not sustainable - we are already in the crisis but we just can't see it yet.

Br Cornelius

Edited by Br Cornelius, 15 June 2013 - 01:51 PM.

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson

#8    redhen

redhen

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,825 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Samsara

Posted 15 June 2013 - 02:24 PM

I recently found this quote from the discoverer and inventor of the first polio vaccine;

“if all insects on Earth disappeared, within 50 years all life on
Earth would end. If all human beings disappeared from the Earth,
within 50 years all forms of life would flourish.”


― Biologist Jonas Salk

Obviously a man that develops a vaccine that saves millions of people is not a misanthrope, but I think this quote is meant to humble us and put homo sapiens in perspective.


#9    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,357 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 15 June 2013 - 02:33 PM

Human beings, not life, is what gives the earth its purpose.  Without us the system and the life on it have no purpose and just continue the day-to-day cycle of life and death until eventually the sun dies.  It is human beings being here that can break this.


#10    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,637 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 15 June 2013 - 02:37 PM

View PostFrank Merton, on 15 June 2013 - 02:33 PM, said:

Human beings, not life, is what gives the earth its purpose.  Without us the system and the life on it have no purpose and just continue the day-to-day cycle of life and death until eventually the sun dies.  It is human beings being here that can break this.
I cannot agree with you anthropocentric and quasi-religious perspective on the world. The planet has no intrinsic purpose other than the purposes we impose on it. There is no objective proof of an external body who give's life purpose, and even if there were we could not in any way discern whether our ideas of purpose coincided with its.
There is certainly no evidence to say that we are in any way a higher form of life than any other form of life, and again this relies on anthropocentric perspective which is not tenable in a nearly infinite universe of infinite life forms.

Br Cornelius

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson

#11    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,357 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 15 June 2013 - 02:38 PM

You just disagreed with me and then repeated what I said.  The planet has no purpose except what human beings find for it.


#12    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 10,637 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 15 June 2013 - 02:41 PM

I disagree with the concept of purpose.

Br Cornelius

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson

#13    Zaphod222

Zaphod222

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,594 posts
  • Joined:05 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tokyo

  • When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.
    (Oscar Wilde)

Posted 15 June 2013 - 02:42 PM

View PostSaru, on 15 June 2013 - 10:41 AM, said:

UN projections have predicted that the world's population will exceed 10 billion by the year 2100.

Where the crisis point is depends on other factors besides pure population size.
Malthus is still fundamentally correct; what has changed the picture is the world-wide "green revolution" that allows us to produce more crops with intensive agriculture.

But intensive agriculture as it is now depends entirely on a continuing supply of cheap oil. Once that disappears, neither agricultural machinery nor artificial fertilizer are available as they are today. And the suddenly the foundation for even feeding our existing population is gone.

So Isay that the crisis point will coincide with the sharp decline after peak oil, which will be pretty soon.

"The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible." (Salman Rushdie)

#14    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,357 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 15 June 2013 - 02:45 PM

Vietnam feeds itself extremely well and exports tons of coffee and rice and rubber with five times the population density on its arable land, so I think the rest of the world could too.  Places where this fails has to do with politics and corruption, not too many people.


#15    Zaphod222

Zaphod222

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,594 posts
  • Joined:05 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tokyo

  • When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.
    (Oscar Wilde)

Posted 15 June 2013 - 02:47 PM

View PostBr Cornelius, on 15 June 2013 - 02:41 PM, said:

I disagree with the concept of purpose.

Br Cornelius

Huh?? You said "The planet has no intrinsic purpose other than the purposes we impose on it."
Which is exactly what Frank Merton said.

So what are you arguing about? Weird!

"The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible." (Salman Rushdie)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users