Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

Republican Jesus™


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#31    Michelle

Michelle

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 18,028 posts
  • Joined:03 Jan 2004
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Tennessee

  • Eleanor Roosevelt: Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.

Posted 17 June 2013 - 04:45 AM

View PostSpiritWriter, on 17 June 2013 - 04:37 AM, said:

Yes you can say this or say that but it WILL be interpreted that way and so in my opinion whoever depicts that image has no problem portraying a racist image. Say you were the first woman president and they drew a pic of you with a slutty outfit. It would be sexist. But you couldn't deny it was a sexist image.

A pic of a hanging is worste than that in my opinion.

There has been much hate thrown at Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, including effigies of hanging and sexual remarks/jokes, but I don't recall an outcry of sexism.

Politics is dirty business, always has been. For anyone that thinks they can be immune to it is a fallacy.


#32    ChloeB

ChloeB

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,163 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 June 2013 - 05:06 AM

View Postszentgyorgy, on 17 June 2013 - 12:58 AM, said:

I don't consider the RJ ™ as either a literal or a comprehensive model--that's why I began with the word "Elements" above. It is a metaphor for an agenda-izing psuedo-majority (the "first" Nixon couched it in the term "Silent Majority") who have hijacked Jesus for their own atavistic purposes. And if one thinks the "Democratic Jesus" of the '60's is a foil in this tournament of metaphors, well, "DJ" was at least more scripturally accurate. I never heard of the J-Man tokin' on a J, but he did imbibe wine, and took massive flak from the Pharisees for it. He loved to wave the sign of peace, too.

Excellent response, yes, I think Democratic Jesus is more biblical.  And not that I'm praising the Democrats or Obama, not my point here, just that these people who are so vocal in the good ol' traditional Christian values and how this country needs to get in line with that, well this article does show the attitudes of how they think and it's not really anything like Jesus is in the bible, but you attach Jesus to something or Christian, just that alone gets a bunch of voters, but their traditional downhome Christian values contradict a lot of what Jesus taught.  It's like in that movie Talladega Nights, they just make Jesus however they want him to be:I like  to pictureJesus in a tuxedo T-Shirt because it says I want to be formal, but I'm here to party, lolol.  Sure, why not?  He's just became a political paper doll to be dressed up whatever way suits them.

“You've gotta dance like there's nobody watching,
Love like you'll never be hurt,
Sing like there's nobody listening,
And live like it's heaven on earth.”
― William W. Purkey

#33    ChloeB

ChloeB

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,163 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 June 2013 - 05:11 AM

View PostParanoid Android, on 17 June 2013 - 12:15 AM, said:

I know this was intended as humour, but I'm going to be a little pedantic and address two or three specific comments:

Or maybe just enough to wipe out a schoolroom filled with kids when their excellent parenting skills manifest themselves in the next Columbine tragedy. - Is the author of this article truly blaming Republican Christians for school shootings based on poor parenting skills?

Republican Jesus™ hates The Gay. They’re sinners, after all.  It says so right there in the Bible next to the part about shellfish being an abomination. - The Bible doesn't actually say eating shellfish is an abomination.  It says that shellfish are "unclean".  The term "abomination" in the Old Testament is a highly religious term, used often to describe idolatrous practices.  When the Bible says that a man who lies with another man is an abomination (Leviticus 18:22), it's commenting on homosexual acts done within the context of idol worship (homosexual sex was a common act of worship to many of the deities surrounding the nation of Israel).  So while I do get the gist of what the author is saying, it is theologically incorrect to label eating shellfish an "abomination".

Of course, this ignores the fact that lesbians (a well-known subset of homosexuality) have the lowest rate of STDs, including AIDS, among all adult population groups. - This may have something to do with the fact that women have no penis to penetrate.  Male homosexuals (another well-known subset of homosexuality) have the highest rate of STD's, including AIDS, among all adult population groups.  I'm not using this argument to say it's wrong, simply pointing out a biological fact.

Other than that, all I can say is that I've never met a Christian who adheres to the teachings of Republican Jesus™.  Must be an American thing.

Oh I just know I'm going to regret getting in another homosexuality discussion with you, but JUST to clarify, here goes..............PA, the point is, if God is punishing homosexuals with STDs and AIDs, why target only males while females have the lowest.  The point of that is to show how full of it they are saying that.  I think we know the biology.

And yes, these attitudes are prevalent more in the southern states of the US, where I live.

“You've gotta dance like there's nobody watching,
Love like you'll never be hurt,
Sing like there's nobody listening,
And live like it's heaven on earth.”
― William W. Purkey

#34    ChloeB

ChloeB

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,163 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 June 2013 - 05:23 AM

View PostZaphod222, on 17 June 2013 - 02:02 AM, said:

Red herring.

I am absolutely not Christian, and I am absolutely concerned about creeping islam, and so should you be.

And, for your information, Islam is not a race.

Playing the "racist" card to excuse the islamic threat to modernity is cheap, polemical, dishonest and ignorant.

I worry about that too, I worry about any religion whose aim is getting in control of government, just like Republican Jesus and his sex-obsessed bible gang wanting to cram their religion into policy to dictate what I can do with my body and hijack birth control I find quite threatening, for example.

“You've gotta dance like there's nobody watching,
Love like you'll never be hurt,
Sing like there's nobody listening,
And live like it's heaven on earth.”
― William W. Purkey

#35    Michelle

Michelle

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 18,028 posts
  • Joined:03 Jan 2004
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Tennessee

  • Eleanor Roosevelt: Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.

Posted 17 June 2013 - 05:36 AM

View PostChloeB, on 17 June 2013 - 05:06 AM, said:

It's like in that movie Talladega Nights, they just make Jesus however they want him to be:I like  to pictureJesus in a tuxedo T-Shirt because it says I want to be formal, but I'm here to party, lolol.  Sure, why not?  He's just became a political paper doll to be dressed up whatever way suits them.

lol Isn't that what everyone does though? Pagans pick and choose what "branch" they adhere to. My own beliefs are more closely related to Pagan and Native American beliefs. When I first started investigating into them I was told I should take my own path and there was no doctrine . That is exactly what Christians and other religions do....they pick and choose what they take from their holy books and apply it to their personal interests and biases.


#36    ChloeB

ChloeB

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,163 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 June 2013 - 05:45 AM

View PostMichelle, on 17 June 2013 - 05:36 AM, said:

lol Isn't that what everyone does though? Pagans pick and choose what "branch" they adhere to. My own beliefs are more closely related to Pagan and Native American beliefs. When I first started investigating into them I was told I should take my own path and there was no doctrine . That is exactly what Christians and other religions do....they pick and choose what they take from their holy books and apply it to their personal interests and biases.

It's different how they use their Jesus and bible card to demand they're right and that it is by command of their one true God and holy book that is how the world or country should be ran, anyone who disagrees is wrong and against Jesus and God.

“You've gotta dance like there's nobody watching,
Love like you'll never be hurt,
Sing like there's nobody listening,
And live like it's heaven on earth.”
― William W. Purkey

#37    Paranoid Android

Paranoid Android

    ????????

  • 28,287 posts
  • Joined:17 Apr 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NSW Mid-North Coast

  • Paranoid Android... *whaa--*

Posted 17 June 2013 - 05:55 AM

View PostChloeB, on 17 June 2013 - 05:11 AM, said:



Oh I just know I'm going to regret getting in another homosexuality discussion with you, but JUST to clarify, here goes..............PA, the point is, if God is punishing homosexuals with STDs and AIDs, why target only males while females have the lowest.  The point of that is to show how full of it they are saying that.  I think we know the biology.

And yes, these attitudes are prevalent more in the southern states of the US, where I live.
I was simply pointing out what thought processes they used by stating a fact I felt the author disingenuously left unsaid.

Why is it I made three points and only the controversial one gets addressed? I could also have pointed out the inaccuracy of the comment on Obama and racism but it was addressed by others. As an Australian viewingAmerican politics, GWB got more heat than Obama ever has. But that aside, the author also blames Republican parenting for school shootings (not parents, parenting -poor parenting skills) as well as butchering Leviticus to make it say something it does not.  But poor PA, only my comment on homosexuality gets picked on :devil:

Posted Image

My blog is now taking a new direction.  Dedicated to my father who was a great inspiration in my life, I wish to honour his memory (RIP, dad) by sharing with the world what he had always kept to himself.  More details, http://www.unexplain...showentry=27811

#38    ChloeB

ChloeB

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,163 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 June 2013 - 06:16 AM

View PostParanoid Android, on 17 June 2013 - 05:55 AM, said:

I was simply pointing out what thought processes they used by stating a fact I felt the author disingenuously left unsaid.

Why is it I made three points and only the controversial one gets addressed?

Your other 2 points were the first, you missed the point of what sarcasm is and the other you gave us a lesson in the differnence in unclean and abomination, neither of those 2 really felt like worth my commenting on, I really don't know what to say to either.  The point about homosexuality and STDs and AIDS you made, I felt like the article was pretty clear in the point in was trying to make, but I guess you didn't, I clarified.

View PostParanoid Android, on 17 June 2013 - 05:55 AM, said:

I could also have pointed out the inaccuracy of the comment on Obama and racism but it was addressed by others. As an Australian viewingAmerican politics, GWB got more heat than Obama ever has. But that aside, the author also blames Republican parenting for school shootings (not parents, parenting -poor parenting skills) as well as butchering Leviticus to make it say something it does not.  But poor PA, only my comment on homosexuality gets picked on :devil:

PA, ya said your own self that you realized it was mean to be humor!!  Now it's all butt hurt and drama time with you.  Butchered Leviticus!!!  Blamed parents for school shootings!!!  Picking on PA!!  I mean come on really?

And my whole point in saying what I said and how I said it about thinking I would regret this, (and just how this played out, can you imagine why I would ever feel that way and yet here we are) was that I didn't want to turn this into another debate thread about homosexuality, just wanted to put that out there.

“You've gotta dance like there's nobody watching,
Love like you'll never be hurt,
Sing like there's nobody listening,
And live like it's heaven on earth.”
― William W. Purkey

#39    Paranoid Android

Paranoid Android

    ????????

  • 28,287 posts
  • Joined:17 Apr 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NSW Mid-North Coast

  • Paranoid Android... *whaa--*

Posted 17 June 2013 - 07:25 AM

View PostChloeB, on 17 June 2013 - 06:16 AM, said:

Your other 2 points were the first, you missed the point of what sarcasm is and the other you gave us a lesson in the differnence in unclean and abomination, neither of those 2 really felt like worth my commenting on, I really don't know what to say to either.  The point about homosexuality and STDs and AIDS you made, I felt like the article was pretty clear in the point in was trying to make, but I guess you didn't, I clarified.

PA, ya said your own self that you realized it was mean to be humor!!  Now it's all butt hurt and drama time with you.  Butchered Leviticus!!!  Blamed parents for school shootings!!!  Picking on PA!!  I mean come on really?

And my whole point in saying what I said and how I said it about thinking I would regret this, (and just how this played out, can you imagine why I would ever feel that way and yet here we are) was that I didn't want to turn this into another debate thread about homosexuality, just wanted to put that out there.
Hey Chloe, I was attempting a bit of sarcasm with my "poor PA, always being picked on" comment, I hoped that would come through with the devil smiley (apologies if it didn't come across to you that way).  As to the rest, I'm all for humour, and I do acknowledge it was attempting to be humorous.  But to me, humour is when you take something true and then turn it on its head somehow.  Sarcasm is NOT outright misrepresenting a person's point of view.  It is not simply calling Republicans bad parents with poor parenting skills (are Democrat parents better?  Are their children less likely to be psychopathic?).  Hence while some of it did come off as humorous, I just had to be pedantic and point to flaws that took away from the humour.  Deliberately misrepresenting a person's political view and religious ideology isn't sarcasm, it's demonisation (my opinion on that one).

Edited by Paranoid Android, 17 June 2013 - 08:15 AM.

Posted Image

My blog is now taking a new direction.  Dedicated to my father who was a great inspiration in my life, I wish to honour his memory (RIP, dad) by sharing with the world what he had always kept to himself.  More details, http://www.unexplain...showentry=27811

#40    Beckys_Mom

Beckys_Mom

    Sarcastic Muppet..!

  • Member
  • 51,196 posts
  • Joined:01 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ireland

  • "I hate pretentious people. I mean, what is the point in applying exorbitantly extensive vocabulary, it is just straightforwardly unnecessary".

Posted 17 June 2013 - 08:48 AM

View PostMichelle, on 17 June 2013 - 02:29 AM, said:

Of course there are. What infuriates me is the attitude that anyone who disagrees with Obama's politics are racists. People claim that effigies of Obama hanging from a noose or portraying him as a monkey are racist when in fact those same kind of images were extremely common of Bush while he was in office. Apparently many people have a short attention span, a selective memory or looking for racism where there is non.

I have never seen such an extreme double standard in my life.

My point was to say that there are some who will hold racists views, and you agree indeed they are.. I also am well aware of those ready to chant racist towards people who speak out against Obama...People LOVE to play the race card when it suits, I am most aware of this, I think everyone is..

Edited by Beckys_Mom, 17 June 2013 - 08:51 AM.

Posted ImageRAW Berris... Dare you enter?

If there's a heaven...I hope to hell I get there !

#41    Zaphod222

Zaphod222

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,614 posts
  • Joined:05 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tokyo

  • When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.
    (Oscar Wilde)

Posted 17 June 2013 - 09:01 AM

View PostChloeB, on 17 June 2013 - 05:23 AM, said:

I worry about that too, I worry about any religion whose aim is getting in control of government, just like Republican Jesus and his sex-obsessed bible gang wanting to cram their religion into policy to dictate what I can do with my body and hijack birth control I find quite threatening, for example.

I am admittedly not following party-political details in the US, but I have certainly not seen that "hijacking birth control" is a part of the Republican party platform. I am aware that there was one particular nutcase who pontificated about "legitimate rape", but I understand he was quickly rebuked by his party collegues.

On the other extreme, do you agree with Obamas policy of giving morning-after pills to under-age girls over the counter? I found that rather astonishing.

"The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible." (Salman Rushdie)

#42    Zaphod222

Zaphod222

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,614 posts
  • Joined:05 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tokyo

  • When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.
    (Oscar Wilde)

Posted 17 June 2013 - 09:04 AM

View PostBeckys_Mom, on 17 June 2013 - 08:48 AM, said:

I also am well aware of those ready to chant racist towards people who speak out against Obama...People LOVE to play the race card when it suits, I am most aware of this, I think everyone is..

Totally agree. Even in the bare-knuckles context of US party politics, the talking point "if you oppose Obamas politics, you are racist" is beyond the pale.

I am astonished to see this kind of intellectual garbage appearing here.

Edited by Zaphod222, 17 June 2013 - 09:05 AM.

"The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible." (Salman Rushdie)

#43    Beckys_Mom

Beckys_Mom

    Sarcastic Muppet..!

  • Member
  • 51,196 posts
  • Joined:01 Nov 2005
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Ireland

  • "I hate pretentious people. I mean, what is the point in applying exorbitantly extensive vocabulary, it is just straightforwardly unnecessary".

Posted 17 June 2013 - 09:52 AM

View PostZaphod222, on 17 June 2013 - 09:04 AM, said:

Totally agree. Even in the bare-knuckles context of US party politics, the talking point "if you oppose Obamas politics, you are racist" is beyond the pale.

I am astonished to see this kind of intellectual garbage appearing here.

You are astonished by it, I am not surprised by it...Nothing surprises me any more.

Posted ImageRAW Berris... Dare you enter?

If there's a heaven...I hope to hell I get there !

#44    ChloeB

ChloeB

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,163 posts
  • Joined:26 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 June 2013 - 12:19 PM

View PostZaphod222, on 17 June 2013 - 09:01 AM, said:

I am admittedly not following party-political details in the US, but I have certainly not seen that "hijacking birth control" is a part of the Republican party platform. I am aware that there was one particular nutcase who pontificated about "legitimate rape", but I understand he was quickly rebuked by his party collegues.

On the other extreme, do you agree with Obamas policy of giving morning-after pills to under-age girls over the counter? I found that rather astonishing.

Astonishing, why?  Yes, I absolutely agree with it if it helps prevent less unwanted pregnancies, more teen moms, and more kids for the taxpayers to support.  The pill is the same drug as birth control pills, just a higher dose, to prevent pregnancy, most people are crying it's an abortion pill, which it's not.  http://ec.princeton....otru.html  So yes, I'm totally for it, they're having sex anyway and it's not stopping, if some can get themselves down to the drug store the next day to try to prevent a pregnancy, well I can't see anything bad about that.  Condoms are better of course, but it doesn't always happen, obviously as we see before these pills were offered.  Uwanted pregnancies lead to more abortions, and people who are against abortion, I can't see why they aren't for this, unless they're ignorant and cry like stupid Glenn Beck and think it's an abortion pill.

Edited by ChloeB, 17 June 2013 - 12:21 PM.

“You've gotta dance like there's nobody watching,
Love like you'll never be hurt,
Sing like there's nobody listening,
And live like it's heaven on earth.”
― William W. Purkey

#45    DeWitz

DeWitz

    DeWitz

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,648 posts
  • Joined:11 Feb 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Niagara Frontier

  • "Follow me, it's in Room 101."
    Clyde P. Fesmire, PhD

Posted 17 June 2013 - 03:31 PM

View PostParanoid Android, on 17 June 2013 - 01:14 AM, said:

Just to be clear, I didn't say I had never heard of this, I said I've never met a person who believes in any of that.

Actually, Para, you didn't say it that way. You said the claim is "ridiculous," implying that you don't believe it. "Ridiculous" can also denote something which is laughable; unworthy of credulity. However you cut it, millions of people believe that racism plays a significant role in the criticism of President Obama. Whether or not you have "met" them is immaterial. You know they exist.

Millions of people exist who deny the Holocaust.

Sadly, I have met a couple of them.

Had I not met them, they would still exist, I would know of them and would still disagree with their execrable nonsense. I might even find it ridiculous.

Edited by szentgyorgy, 17 June 2013 - 03:33 PM.

[previously incarnate as 'szentgyorgy']

"Things fall apart. . . it's scientific." - Talking Heads




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users