Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

If You Know How a Cow Feels,Will You Eat Less

cow meat slaughterhouse

  • Please log in to reply
117 replies to this topic

#1    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 38,633 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • "Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better." - Albert Einstein

Posted 13 July 2013 - 10:33 AM

Inside a lab on the Stanford University campus, students experience what it might feel like to be a cow.

They donned a virtual reality helmet and walked on hands and feet while in a virtual mirror they saw themselves as bovine. As the animal was jabbed with an electrical prod, a lab worker poked a volunteer's side with a sticklike device. The ground shook to simulate the prod's vibrations. The cow at the end was led toward a slaughterhouse.

https://www.scientif...u-eat-less-meat

Posted Image

#2    chopmo

chopmo

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 341 posts
  • Joined:22 Nov 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

  • aaaah rabble rabble rabble rabble

Posted 13 July 2013 - 10:47 AM

People should ware the viturality hat of the tofu eating lion.
Vegetarians, ect. get too much glory IMO, animal standards is what should be in focus not eating choices.

why is everyone so &^%$ing concerned with "the end"...
new beginnings is what you should be concerned about...

#3    ZaraKitty

ZaraKitty

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,202 posts
  • Joined:10 Mar 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Australia

  • I can see it in their eyes, they've already died.

Posted 13 July 2013 - 01:33 PM

Except cows aren't self aware (to our knowledge) so if we strip away the rational thought all you get is pain and fear that animals suffer through anyway (when they are hunted by other animals).

Good study though.

The internet is a series of tubes, and those tubes are full of cats.

#4    redhen

redhen

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,825 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Samsara

Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:23 PM

""If somebody becomes an animal, do they gain empathy for that animal and think about its plight?" Bailenson asked. "In this case, empathy toward the animal also coincides with an environmental benefit, which is that [not eating] animals consumes less energy.""

How does empathy with a sentient beings pain equate with environmental conservation? That does not logically follow. More waste of tax payers money.

Instead of expensive and complicated VR equipment, why don't they take the volunteers down to the nearest slaughterhouse? Granted they would be refused entrance, but they could watch and listen as the animals are unloaded. Or cheaper yet, just watch Earthlings.

I guess that would negate the need for such "scientific" studies and peoples academic careers. Obviously more studies and grants are needed.


#5    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,405 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:26 PM

View PostZaraKitty, on 13 July 2013 - 01:33 PM, said:

Except cows aren't self aware (to our knowledge) so if we strip away the rational thought all you get is pain and fear that animals suffer through anyway (when they are hunted by other animals).

Good study though.
I don't know how we can possible assess whether cows are self-aware or not.  If I sneak up behind one and give him a good swift kick, he seems self-aware to me.


#6    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,405 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:27 PM

That we evolved in an uncaring natural environment where suffering is the driving force of evolution does not carry with it the implication that we are justified in carrying on with it.


#7    markdohle

markdohle

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,753 posts
  • Joined:21 May 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Atlanta area

Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:31 PM

View PostFrank Merton, on 13 July 2013 - 02:26 PM, said:

I don't know how we can possible assess whether cows are self-aware or not.  If I sneak up behind one and give him a good swift kick, he seems self-aware to me.

Awarness is not the same as self-awareness.  We dream, self awarness may not be present in the dream....we can step back. most of us in our normal waking life, know what we are, human beings, we have a name, we ponder the meaning of life, do mucis etc.... not sure cows can do that, well they can't.  They have awarness of course, and we should do all that we can not to be cruel, but they are part of the food chain, so eating them is not a problem for me.  However, again, we should look at better ways to dispatch them that lessens their suffering somewhat.  In the natural world, animals do suffer when hunted, not sure they have anxiety disorders, since they may not be able to anticipate that way humans do, so we most likely project a lot on to them that is not actually real.  I doubt they think about tomorrorw or yesterday for that matter.....they live 'now', in the present, which for the most part is no doubt quite pleasant for them.

peace
mark

Edited by markdohle, 13 July 2013 - 02:34 PM.


#8    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,405 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:38 PM

You assert that self-awareness and awareness are not the same.  I am not sure.   (This is not a denial on your part -- I really am not sure).  I can see two arguments.  First is sentience -- the ability to experience the world via qualia rather than reflexively.   Neurologists pretty much agree that animals that have evolved serotonin pathways have this, which would include mammals and birds and probably dinosaurs but not many if any modern reptiles.

The second is this hazy notion we have of "self-awareness" (the mirror test has been looked at and found wanting) that maybe only humans have because of language or maybe all sentient animals have.  We don't know and have no imaginable way of finding out.


#9    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,405 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:40 PM

I do however have a more serious problem with what you say now that the pedantic part is over: suffering is suffering.  What the hell difference does it make if the animal dying for our benefit suffers a lot or only a little?


#10    ZaraKitty

ZaraKitty

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,202 posts
  • Joined:10 Mar 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Australia

  • I can see it in their eyes, they've already died.

Posted 13 July 2013 - 02:59 PM

View PostFrank Merton, on 13 July 2013 - 02:26 PM, said:

I don't know how we can possible assess whether cows are self-aware or not.  If I sneak up behind one and give him a good swift kick, he seems self-aware to me.

Oh, I mean he can't recognise himself in the mirror. Like babies can't until they're 3-4 and they realise the world exists outside of them and become aware of their self in the mirror, like te smudge test? I don't know how to explain it, also I'm on my phone so sorry if I don't make sense!

The internet is a series of tubes, and those tubes are full of cats.

#11    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,405 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 13 July 2013 - 03:17 PM

Some animals seem to recognize themselves in the mirror tests, others of the same species don't.  There are problems with interpreting the results anyway in the context if self-awareness.  It might be evidence or it might not -- animals might be quite self-aware but not passing the test and vice-versa.

There is a also a moral problem with drawing the line at self-awareness anyway.  An animal that suffers is suffering.  That we can dismiss this by saying they are not self-aware seems at best problematic and way too self-serving.  I am put in mind of Voltaire's writing a vivid description of the vivisection of a dog in a public square in Paris as a demonstration of the "dogs have no soul and hence don't suffer" teaching of Descartes.


#12    Zaphod222

Zaphod222

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,594 posts
  • Joined:05 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tokyo

  • When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.
    (Oscar Wilde)

Posted 13 July 2013 - 03:27 PM

View PostStill Waters, on 13 July 2013 - 10:33 AM, said:

Inside a lab on the Stanford University campus, students experience what it might feel like to be a cow.

They donned a virtual reality helmet and walked on hands and feet while in a virtual mirror they saw themselves as bovine. As the animal was jabbed with an electrical prod, a lab worker poked a volunteer's side with a sticklike device. The ground shook to simulate the prod's vibrations. The cow at the end was led toward a slaughterhouse.

https://www.scientif...u-eat-less-meat

Well. They should have tried cutting their throats without anestisia. Because that is what the halal/kosher crowd insists on.
I take modern, western animal slaughter methods anytime. Of course, they have to be supervised and enforced properly.

Frankly, I think it is outrageous that the religionists are allowed to circumvent our animal protection laws by referring to some medieveal oriental gods. Crazy!

"The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible." (Salman Rushdie)

#13    redhen

redhen

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,825 posts
  • Joined:14 Aug 2005
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Samsara

Posted 13 July 2013 - 03:36 PM

"the question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?"

- Jeremy Bentham (1748 - 1832) founder of Utilitarianism


Edited by redhen, 13 July 2013 - 03:36 PM.


#14    Zaphod222

Zaphod222

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,594 posts
  • Joined:05 Sep 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tokyo

  • When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.
    (Oscar Wilde)

Posted 13 July 2013 - 03:43 PM

View Postredhen, on 13 July 2013 - 03:36 PM, said:

"the question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?"

- Jeremy Bentham (1748 - 1832) founder of Utilitarianism



Well, that is a bit of of a slippery slope. Depending on who you ask, fish can suffer, even plants can suffer. If you follow that line, you run into the problems that radical Jains do...

"The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible." (Salman Rushdie)

#15    Frank Merton

Frank Merton

    Blue fish

  • Member
  • 14,405 posts
  • Joined:22 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

  • fmerton.blogspot.com

Posted 13 July 2013 - 03:54 PM

View PostZaphod222, on 13 July 2013 - 03:43 PM, said:

Well, that is a bit of of a slippery slope. Depending on who you ask, fish can suffer, even plants can suffer. If you follow that line, you run into the problems that radical Jains do...
Yes we all run into that problem, as well as a lot of other moral problems as we make our way through life.  The real problem is moral absolutism -- the idea that we must somehow be "without sin" in Christian terms.  Buddhists have a slightly less difficult time of it, being only commanded to do less harm than good.

As a personal choice I don't eat meat except when it is offered to me as a guest.  It isn't good for me anyway.  As a personal choice I tell the truth, except when the truth is going to hurt someone.  Then I lie.






Also tagged with cow, meat, slaughterhouse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users