Whoa. It's YOUR claims that are the subject of required proof, and citing an internet website is simply inadequate.
My claim is that the original documents cited on the pro-UFO website are inaccurately reported.
Go to the ORIGINAL documents and compare to the way they were reported and the way you were tricked into believing.
Save yourself. I can't do it for you.
You want to be an accessory after the fact to your own duping, then so be it.