Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 2 votes

[Merged] Was Princess Diana Murdered


  • Please log in to reply
67 replies to this topic

#61    Peter B

Peter B

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,325 posts
  • Joined:29 Mar 2009
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:Yes We Can-berra!

Posted 02 May 2014 - 10:36 AM

View PostMr. Smith, on 01 May 2014 - 12:05 AM, said:

Yeah, I bet you read it all on teh intarwebs.

People like the Prince, King to be, of one of the most powerful nations of the 19th and 20th century, write their own history. He has teams of clever public relations spinners and whizzers at his disposal.  Layers of handlers to keep his hands spotless combined with the power to destroy anyone in the gov't who so much as speculates about it.  How could one person without 24-7 teams of highly trained security be any problem for someone like that?

People who have everything are just as capable of murder as someone who has nothing. What makes it difficult to imagine he wanted her dead for the same good old fashioned reasons?
1. Kids
2. Money
3. Jealousy
4. Hate
5. Fear (of something becoming known)

I could go on.. Ultimately we really don't and never will know. He's got people and he's a great actor.

Please go on. I'd like you to explain how you know Princess Diana was the target and not one of the other three people in the car.

Thank you.


#62    regeneratia

regeneratia

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,117 posts
  • Joined:20 Jun 2010
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:All my posts are my own views, my own perceptions. Will not be finding links for why I think the way I do.

  • It is time to put the big guns down now, Little Boys!

Posted 17 May 2014 - 11:34 PM

View PostSundew, on 19 August 2013 - 02:23 PM, said:

We were actually in France the day this happened and by complete coincidence drove through the tunnel where the accident occurred the following day. You could see the damage to the steel and concrete, as well as signs and flowers lining the roadway. Despite the sometimes less than civil attitudes that exist between the French and the Brits, the French people we saw were extremely upset by this. I always felt rather badly for Diana, she was a beautiful woman with a kind heart from all accounts, yet she was married to Charles the philanderer, hardly a story book life.

Fame: like living your life in an aquarium. You can have it.

I went thru the tunnel a month later.

Truth is such a rare quality, a stranger so seldom met in this civilization of fraud, that it is never received freely, but must fight its way into the world
Professor Hilton Hotema
(quote from THE BIBLE FRAUD)

Robert Heinlein: SECRECY IS THE HALLMARK OF TYRANNY!

#63    regeneratia

regeneratia

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 4,117 posts
  • Joined:20 Jun 2010
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:All my posts are my own views, my own perceptions. Will not be finding links for why I think the way I do.

  • It is time to put the big guns down now, Little Boys!

Posted 17 May 2014 - 11:35 PM

View PostKowalski, on 19 August 2013 - 02:49 PM, said:

Well, Charles was in love with Camilla, and he never really loved Diana. He just married her to make everyone happy. Diana was also not the innocent party she claimed to be either. She had affairs, and I think she had some serious psychological issues. A lot of the guys she had affairs with described her as overly clingy and emotionally fragile, and she could be downright obsessive. I know, Charles wasn't a saint, but neither was Diana. Diana was also good at spinning the media to appear as the "wronged wife" and the injured party.

If I was married to Charles, I would have a massive amount of affairs too. No one on earth is a saint. We all have flaws. We should all just be seeking happiness.

Truth is such a rare quality, a stranger so seldom met in this civilization of fraud, that it is never received freely, but must fight its way into the world
Professor Hilton Hotema
(quote from THE BIBLE FRAUD)

Robert Heinlein: SECRECY IS THE HALLMARK OF TYRANNY!

#64    coolguy

coolguy

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,965 posts
  • Joined:06 Feb 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:east islip , new york

  • Star trek rules

Posted 18 May 2014 - 04:52 AM

Charles had her killed or even his mother


#65    Border Collie

Border Collie

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 671 posts
  • Joined:30 Sep 2013
  • Gender:Male

  • Schrodinger's dog

Posted 20 May 2014 - 02:02 AM

View Postcoolguy, on 18 May 2014 - 04:52 AM, said:

Charles had her killed or even his mother

BS. Zero evidence for this fantasy, quite the opposite actually. I loath the Windsors as much as the next man but these accusations about Diana are simply unfounded and unsupported.

Move on, people. Nothing to see here.


#66    Monkfish

Monkfish

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 82 posts
  • Joined:02 Apr 2014
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northern Ireland

  • You'll love it here Mulder every day is like Halloween.

Posted 21 May 2014 - 07:28 PM

I must say I always felt very sorry for this poor girl. Not that she would ever admit to needing my sympathy you understand. She was basically well not terribly intelligent. She failed all her school exams twice and then worked as a childrens nanny until she was discovered and elevated to royal status.

I felt it was possibly one of those "seemed like a good idea at the time" scenarios when the prospect of being a royal bride and producing an heir to the throne was just too good to turn down. The dream must have quickly become a nightmare. Her divorce and subsequent sexual misdemeanors were probably not a rebellion or a deliberate plan to ridicule the royal family but she was just not up to it.

Seeing her husband, or ex husband with a troll must have been a bit like seeing your ex wife run off with another woman. But the idea that she was deliberately targeted by    MI5 or another organisation manipulated by royal or government connections is frankly absurd. Her boyfriend father began business life as an arms dealer. His business connections now mostly separated from would  have given   more serious speculation to him being the target of any such criminal activity.


#67    amaterasu

amaterasu

    Government Agent

  • Member
  • 3,626 posts
  • Joined:13 Oct 2008
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Liverpool, UK

  • "Recedite, plebes! Gero rem imperialem!"

Posted 21 May 2014 - 11:06 PM

Diana was unfortunate enough to be born into an aristocratic family and her fate was sealed when she married Charles, lets face it - she was never going to allowed to 'marry out'

It seemed to me to be a stilted relationship, probably arranged and Charles was punching way above his weight when he landed her. They never looked comfortable in each others company and I wasn't at all surprised when it was reported that Charles had been in love with Camilla for years, she is far more his horsey type :lol:  

Sadly Diana was no more than a performing chimp, playing her part in the whole Royal fiasco and it all got too much for her - that is why she looked for love elsewhere ....I'm still convinced that Hewitt is Harry's bio father ....will I get shot for saying that?

I do not believe for one minute that she was bumped off though - she was victim to a horrific car accident and she may well have survived if she had been wearing a seat belt.

I feel sorry for her sons who no doubt read this sh!t all the time about their mother's death and wonder if it makes them doubt the people around them everyday. Their own family, it must make them second guess everything - I know it would make me!

Edited by amaterasu, 21 May 2014 - 11:07 PM.

* Group logo removed, please see rule 3i *

#68    Monkfish

Monkfish

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 82 posts
  • Joined:02 Apr 2014
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northern Ireland

  • You'll love it here Mulder every day is like Halloween.

Posted 22 May 2014 - 07:38 AM

View Postamaterasu, on 21 May 2014 - 11:06 PM, said:

It seemed to me to be a stilted relationship, probably arranged and Charles was punching way above his weight when he landed her. They never looked comfortable in each others company and I wasn't at all surprised when it was reported that Charles had been in love with Camilla for years, she is far more his horsey type :lol:  

Sadly Diana was no more than a performing chimp, playing her part in the whole Royal fiasco and it all got too much for her - that is why she looked for love elsewhere ....I'm still convinced that Hewitt is Harry's bio father ....will I get shot for saying that?

Sorry I can't buy any of that. Charles was forced into this relationship just as she was. Remember she was a gawky 19 year old, very overweight, short of confidence and self esteem and sorry to say it a bit thick. The good points were that she had the right address, parents and lineage and hips made for child bearing.  Charles was getting to the stage where he was getting the upper hand and the prospect of a divorcee being the next queen and providing an heir to the throne was unacceptable. And lets face it the rest of the Queens children were not a lot better.  

Someone in authority was getting desperate

You also need to check your facts as I am sure you will find that the ginger bloke wasn't in the frame when Harry was conceived. Harry by the way has a very striking similarity to Di's rather natty brother.

Edited by Monkfish, 22 May 2014 - 08:06 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users