Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

[Merged] Was Princess Diana Murdered


Commander CMG

Recommended Posts

Prince Charles had her killed

Your avatar say so, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Possible release around late August.

paparpur2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the royal family are all reptiles (and Philly the Greek certainly acts like one at times? This would seem a very sloppy job. Would have been defeated by wearing a seat belt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A more simplified answer is the following:

Diana was killed by the pack of paparazzi who just had to get another bloody photograph of her. She and the others in the car - aside from the guard - didn't help by not using seatbelts. Frankly, if this allegation is true, it would never have been allowed to be reported. We'd have instead got a few journos commiting suicide in odd but not at all suspicious circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course this leaves aside the other question:

Why do all the conspiracy theorists assume Princess Diana was the target?

Why not investigate theories that someone wanted Fayed or Paul dead? Or the ultimate irony: Rhys-Jones was the target and ended up as the only survivor...

Edited by Peter B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only one person could have had enough motive to be willing to take her life. One person with enough desire to have her gone forever. The same person who in all cases like this is the #1 suspect-from the poor to the rich and all in between.

If you still don't know who xxx I'm talking about I can't help you.

ETA: And yes, no one is allowed to mention "XXX" by name.

Edited by Mr. Smith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only one person could have had enough motive to be willing to take her life. One person with enough desire to have her gone forever. The same person who in all cases like this is the #1 suspect-from the poor to the rich and all in between.

If you still don't know who xxx I'm talking about I can't help you.

ETA: And yes, no one is allowed to mention "XXX" by name.

This is assuming that it was murder and the investigations do not support this, as you are well aware. It also assumes that she was the target.

But as it was not murder, the hidden identity of the only person you believe had the motive to do it is a complete irrelevance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is assuming that it was murder and the investigations do not support this, as you are well aware. It also assumes that she was the target.

But as it was not murder, the hidden identity of the only person you believe had the motive to do it is a complete irrelevance.

Yeah, I bet you read it all on teh intarwebs.

People like the Prince, King to be, of one of the most powerful nations of the 19th and 20th century, write their own history. He has teams of clever public relations spinners and whizzers at his disposal. Layers of handlers to keep his hands spotless combined with the power to destroy anyone in the gov't who so much as speculates about it. How could one person without 24-7 teams of highly trained security be any problem for someone like that?

People who have everything are just as capable of murder as someone who has nothing. What makes it difficult to imagine he wanted her dead for the same good old fashioned reasons?

1. Kids

2. Money

3. Jealousy

4. Hate

5. Fear (of something becoming known)

I could go on.. Ultimately we really don't and never will know. He's got people and he's a great actor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I bet you read it all on teh intarwebs.

People like the Prince, King to be, of one of the most powerful nations of the 19th and 20th century, write their own history. He has teams of clever public relations spinners and whizzers at his disposal. Layers of handlers to keep his hands spotless combined with the power to destroy anyone in the gov't who so much as speculates about it. How could one person without 24-7 teams of highly trained security be any problem for someone like that?

People who have everything are just as capable of murder as someone who has nothing. What makes it difficult to imagine he wanted her dead for the same good old fashioned reasons?

1. Kids

2. Money

3. Jealousy

4. Hate

5. Fear (of something becoming known)

I could go on.. Ultimately we really don't and never will know. He's got people and he's a great actor.

Paranoia much? The event has been investigated at length by two seperate sovereign states who don't particularly like each other and rarely agree on anything. But they agreed on this one thing. Diana was not murdered.

Neither Chas nor Phillie the Greek has much actual power. But they would be utterly idiotic and their teams of assassins completely incompetent to dream up a plan which would have been defeated by her strapping on a seat belt.

It is quite clear to anyone who wants to see. No conspiracy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I bet you read it all on teh intarwebs.

People like the Prince, King to be, of one of the most powerful nations of the 19th and 20th century, write their own history. He has teams of clever public relations spinners and whizzers at his disposal. Layers of handlers to keep his hands spotless combined with the power to destroy anyone in the gov't who so much as speculates about it. How could one person without 24-7 teams of highly trained security be any problem for someone like that?

People who have everything are just as capable of murder as someone who has nothing. What makes it difficult to imagine he wanted her dead for the same good old fashioned reasons?

1. Kids

2. Money

3. Jealousy

4. Hate

5. Fear (of something becoming known)

I could go on.. Ultimately we really don't and never will know. He's got people and he's a great actor.

Please go on. I'd like you to explain how you know Princess Diana was the target and not one of the other three people in the car.

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

We were actually in France the day this happened and by complete coincidence drove through the tunnel where the accident occurred the following day. You could see the damage to the steel and concrete, as well as signs and flowers lining the roadway. Despite the sometimes less than civil attitudes that exist between the French and the Brits, the French people we saw were extremely upset by this. I always felt rather badly for Diana, she was a beautiful woman with a kind heart from all accounts, yet she was married to Charles the philanderer, hardly a story book life.

Fame: like living your life in an aquarium. You can have it.

I went thru the tunnel a month later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well, Charles was in love with Camilla, and he never really loved Diana. He just married her to make everyone happy. Diana was also not the innocent party she claimed to be either. She had affairs, and I think she had some serious psychological issues. A lot of the guys she had affairs with described her as overly clingy and emotionally fragile, and she could be downright obsessive. I know, Charles wasn't a saint, but neither was Diana. Diana was also good at spinning the media to appear as the "wronged wife" and the injured party.

If I was married to Charles, I would have a massive amount of affairs too. No one on earth is a saint. We all have flaws. We should all just be seeking happiness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charles had her killed or even his mother

BS. Zero evidence for this fantasy, quite the opposite actually. I loath the Windsors as much as the next man but these accusations about Diana are simply unfounded and unsupported.

Move on, people. Nothing to see here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must say I always felt very sorry for this poor girl. Not that she would ever admit to needing my sympathy you understand. She was basically well not terribly intelligent. She failed all her school exams twice and then worked as a childrens nanny until she was discovered and elevated to royal status.

I felt it was possibly one of those "seemed like a good idea at the time" scenarios when the prospect of being a royal bride and producing an heir to the throne was just too good to turn down. The dream must have quickly become a nightmare. Her divorce and subsequent sexual misdemeanors were probably not a rebellion or a deliberate plan to ridicule the royal family but she was just not up to it.

Seeing her husband, or ex husband with a troll must have been a bit like seeing your ex wife run off with another woman. But the idea that she was deliberately targeted by MI5 or another organisation manipulated by royal or government connections is frankly absurd. Her boyfriend father began business life as an arms dealer. His business connections now mostly separated from would have given more serious speculation to him being the target of any such criminal activity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diana was unfortunate enough to be born into an aristocratic family and her fate was sealed when she married Charles, lets face it - she was never going to allowed to 'marry out'

It seemed to me to be a stilted relationship, probably arranged and Charles was punching way above his weight when he landed her. They never looked comfortable in each others company and I wasn't at all surprised when it was reported that Charles had been in love with Camilla for years, she is far more his horsey type :lol:

Sadly Diana was no more than a performing chimp, playing her part in the whole Royal fiasco and it all got too much for her - that is why she looked for love elsewhere ....I'm still convinced that Hewitt is Harry's bio father ....will I get shot for saying that?

I do not believe for one minute that she was bumped off though - she was victim to a horrific car accident and she may well have survived if she had been wearing a seat belt.

I feel sorry for her sons who no doubt read this sh!t all the time about their mother's death and wonder if it makes them doubt the people around them everyday. Their own family, it must make them second guess everything - I know it would make me!

Edited by amaterasu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed to me to be a stilted relationship, probably arranged and Charles was punching way above his weight when he landed her. They never looked comfortable in each others company and I wasn't at all surprised when it was reported that Charles had been in love with Camilla for years, she is far more his horsey type :lol:

Sadly Diana was no more than a performing chimp, playing her part in the whole Royal fiasco and it all got too much for her - that is why she looked for love elsewhere ....I'm still convinced that Hewitt is Harry's bio father ....will I get shot for saying that?

Sorry I can't buy any of that. Charles was forced into this relationship just as she was. Remember she was a gawky 19 year old, very overweight, short of confidence and self esteem and sorry to say it a bit thick. The good points were that she had the right address, parents and lineage and hips made for child bearing. Charles was getting to the stage where he was getting the upper hand and the prospect of a divorcee being the next queen and providing an heir to the throne was unacceptable. And lets face it the rest of the Queens children were not a lot better.

Someone in authority was getting desperate

You also need to check your facts as I am sure you will find that the ginger bloke wasn't in the frame when Harry was conceived. Harry by the way has a very striking similarity to Di's rather natty brother.

Edited by Monkfish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.