Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Being Liable for Texting a Driver


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1    Q-C

Q-C

    BugWhisperer

  • Member
  • 5,533 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Tejas

Posted 29 August 2013 - 10:42 PM


"Is it now illegal to text someone who is driving? No, not yet. The criminal laws on this issue haven't changed in New Jersey or elsewhere. But the New Jersey judges appear to be saying that texting someone who is driving could make you liable to a civil lawsuit, based on existing laws against distracting a driver."

"I could envision a situation where an exchange goes back and forth and the driver explicitly says 'I'm driving' and you have someone who says, 'This needs to be answered right now. This is an emergency. It can't wait.'"

http://www.cnn.com/2....html?hpt=hp_t2

It is the driver's responsibility, 100%, in my opinion.


Bigfoot is in the eye of the beholder

Scottish Scientists Only!

#2    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 12,180 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queensland, Australia.

Posted 29 August 2013 - 10:48 PM

See the advantage of texts is ... you can answer them whenever you want. Unlike the phone which is screaming "pay attention to me! pay attention to me!" a text will go bip bip (or whatever), make less noise then the radio, or the wind coming in the windows or even a particularly loud fart.

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing.
Only I will remain.

#3    PlanB

PlanB

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 726 posts
  • Joined:12 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

  • Find out what you love and let it kill you.

Posted 29 August 2013 - 10:49 PM

The beauty of texting is that each particpant gets back to the other at their own convenience. If you are texting someone that you KNOW is driving, then expect to be ignored. If it's a real emergency, and it's legal to use your cell phone while driving, then call that person.

Edit: Looks like Sir Wearer of Hats and I had pretty much the same thoughts on this. Apologies for redundancy.

Edited by PlanB, 29 August 2013 - 10:52 PM.


#4    Drayno

Drayno

    Bounty Hunter

  • Member
  • 3,890 posts
  • Joined:18 Jan 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Neo-Mars

Posted 29 August 2013 - 11:41 PM

How are you going to be liable when you text someone and don't know they're driving?

This is asinine.

It's different when you know someone is driving of course, but they better not not implicate someone who doesn't even know the person they were texting was driving in a civil lawsuit.

Edited by Hatake Kakashi, 29 August 2013 - 11:44 PM.

"Let us sit upon the ground and tell sad stories of the death of kings."
- William Shakespeare, Richard II, Act III, Scene II
Posted Image

#5    Q-C

Q-C

    BugWhisperer

  • Member
  • 5,533 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2012
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Tejas

Posted 30 August 2013 - 12:33 AM

I still think it shouldn't matter if you think/know the person is driving and text them.
I can't send the grocery list while H is driving to the store? Or, text directions to the restaurant we're meeting at? Etc etc
There are a lot of distractions to drivers. Driving is a responsibility and with it comes responsible behavior on the part of the driver.

Bigfoot is in the eye of the beholder

Scottish Scientists Only!

#6    Ashotep

Ashotep

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,710 posts
  • Joined:10 May 2011
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:USA

  • Courage is being scared to death but saddling up anyway-John Wayne

Posted 30 August 2013 - 12:39 AM

I absolutely don't think you should be liable for texting someone that is driving.  Its up to the driver to answer it or not.  Besides most of the time you will have no idea what they are doing.


#7    Thanato

Thanato

    Alien Abducter

  • Member
  • 4,388 posts
  • Joined:27 Jun 2004

Posted 30 August 2013 - 01:20 AM

Why should the texter be liable for what the textie does? The person who is driving and recieves a text made the choice to answer while driving. That is completely out of the hands of the person who wrote the text.

~Thanato

"Your toast has been burnt, and no amount of scrapping will remove the black parts!" ~Caboose

"I will eat your unhappyness!" ~Caboose

****
"Freedom isn't bought in stores, it is bought on battlefields." ~Thanato
****

#8    Yamato

Yamato

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 12,316 posts
  • Joined:08 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected

Posted 30 August 2013 - 03:44 AM

"The defendant made me look at my phone by texting me!" is never going to hold up in court.

"The power to declare war, including the power of judging the causes of war, is fully and exclusively vested in the Legislature.  The Executive has no right, in any case, to decide the question" ~ James Madison
"Peace cannot be achieved by force, only by understanding."  ~ Albert Einstein
"To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.   To impose on them a wretched life of hunger and deprivation is to dehumanize them." ~ Nelson Mandela
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.  Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." ~ Mahatma Gandhi

#9    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,409 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 30 August 2013 - 02:30 PM

That'll never fly in court.

"For me, it is better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."
                                                                                                                                           - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World:  Science as a Candle in the Dark

#10    Sweetpumper

Sweetpumper

    Heatseeker

  • Member
  • 10,768 posts
  • Joined:19 Dec 2003
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Avengers Tower

Posted 30 August 2013 - 02:56 PM

Well, at least we know they're working on the important stuff, as usual.

"At it's most basic level, science is supposed to represent the investigation of the unexplained, not the explanation of the uninvestigated." - Hunt for the Skinwalker

"The ultimate irony of the Disclosure movement is that it deeply distrusts officialdom, while simultaneously looking to officialdom for the truth." - Robbie Graham Silver Screen Saucers

#11    Dark_Grey

Dark_Grey

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,866 posts
  • Joined:08 Oct 2003
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Alberta, Canada

  • if (empty($universe)) {
    include 'reality.php';
    }

Posted 30 August 2013 - 02:58 PM

View PostSir Wearer of Hats, on 29 August 2013 - 10:48 PM, said:

a text will go bip bip (or whatever), make less noise then the radio, or the wind coming in the windows or even a particularly loud fart.

I have verified this. It is true.

The rich start wars

The poor fight them

Their children pay for them


#12    Purplos

Purplos

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,574 posts
  • Joined:03 Apr 2005
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Fighting ennui in suburban NJ

  • Everything important is infinite.

Posted 30 August 2013 - 05:15 PM

Texting with intent definitely a felony crime.

Then the lawyers can argue whether it was a premeditated text or if you texted in the heat of passion.

I can just see the jail cells now...

"What are you in for, Bubba?"   -- "I murdered and ate my mailman 'cause he forgot my subscription to Better Homes & Gardens."
"What are you in for, kid?" -- lol i txt my bff n she died #yolo

Embrace the impossible.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users