Elizabeth Woodworth, Consensus 911: We have some of the top experts in the field who've published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and yes, these scientific journals exist, like the Heritage Study, but they're never covered in the media.
If people knew about the research, they would find it compelling. Dr. Griffin has said he's never heard of anybody who saw the evidence, became converted to this point of view and then changed back.
After reading that garbage, I couldn't help myself.
1. DRG is nothing short of a 9/11 truther parrot. He is a professor of theology, which has nothing to do with analysis of scientific evidence.
2. No truther has ever professionally published a paper directly refuting NIST or OCT.
The website seems to be stuck back in 2006 when most of the BS mentioned in that link has already been debunked to the ground. Reasons like this that RT articles can't be taken seriously.