Jump to content

Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.

- - - - -

Formula For Time Travel

time travel formula aliens

  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

#31    pallidin


    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,090 posts
  • Joined:09 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Somewhere south of the North Pole

  • "When life gets you down... swim with a dolphin"

Posted 13 September 2013 - 12:56 AM

View Postkeninsc, on 10 September 2013 - 07:53 AM, said:

Keep in mind that this is simply a means of determining what a frequency should be. It's like saying normal body temperature is 98.6 degrees, if you are normal.

As a total aside, "normal" body temp is actually a range, not a specific degree...

Normal human body temperature, also known as normothermia or euthermia, depends upon the place in the body at which the measurement is made, and the time of day and level of activity of the person. Despite the popular belief, there is no single number that represents a normal or healthy temperature for all people under all circumstances using any place of measurement.

Source: http://en.wikipedia....ody_temperature

Anyway, no need for me to split hairs, just informing.
Back on topic...

#32    keninsc



  • Closed
  • 3,234 posts
  • Joined:08 Mar 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The problem with people who have no vices is that generally you can be pretty sure they're going to have some pretty annoying virtues. Liz Taylor

Posted 13 September 2013 - 05:28 PM

Thank you for that Captain Obvious.

#33    sirius_green


    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • Joined:13 Sep 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Diego

  • Aint nobody got time for that ****

Posted 13 September 2013 - 05:57 PM

View PostCT1993, on 10 September 2013 - 05:45 AM, said:


That's a answer not an equation isn't it? If it somehow was of use with measuring time, other factors are still required aren't they?

If he owned an airport, how many RADAR records of UFO's does he have?

Not saying I agree with this guy, but at your point of wheres the RADAR records, UFO's tend to not appear on RADAR.

Edited by sirius_green, 13 September 2013 - 05:59 PM.

#34    onereaderone


    Extraterrestrial Entity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 378 posts
  • Joined:21 Jan 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:earth

  • interfacing transdimentional inverse mobius feed back loop

Posted 02 October 2013 - 01:26 PM

View Postqxcontinuum, on 11 September 2013 - 02:22 PM, said:

Actually some did. but he've said that some are likely to not happen because our present is not his past due to some highly quantuum physics theories where you cannot travel back to time within the same parallel. Later scientist have launched this theory as entirely potential. In the same time many of his claims have buffered scientist back then and after years of breaking throw discoveries including those from Cern, have made his claims becoming very possible. In the same time how can someone explain the fact that he knew about a particular IBM computer having designed a software capable of debugging functions in the future, while this knowledge was only knew by a few engineers from ibm who later have approved what titor had mentioned while the information was classified.

i don't beleive the computer  titor  talked about  was classifide beyond  it had features  that  were  remarkable to  that  single   model .

what  was unique of titor's  intrest in it  was  that very few people  currently , or  in the  past were aware  of  the  unique caricter of  that model ....   very much  like  few people  reading  this  post  know  what  a LS75373 octal latch is...  30  years  ago  they were  commonly  used  and  it  is  unremarkable  to  understand  or  use them .   for  titor  to  know  about  a computer  from 50  years  ago seems  remarkable  to  us  now,  but  it  means  the  person  who  was  posting  was  likly  older and  techology  wise

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users