Yes, it does.
Every scientist on the planet. Every human being who has even a most basic grasp of scientific principles and the Scientific Method. But since you wanted support for this view I link you to Exhibit A -
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step—known as a theory—in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.
When used in non-scientific context, the word “theory” implies that something is unproven or speculative. As used in science, however, a theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena.
There's more in the link but this, particularly the highlighted area, shows how a scientific theory is not just unsupported guesswork, as you are implying it to be.
Flippancy won't get you very far, Larry. Especially when you haven't put forward any information of your own and routinely ignore 99% of points made to you.
My physical father was a great man, immigrated to Australia from Latvia in the late 40's/early 50's, and raised me and my brother in total love, unfortunately passing away in December last year. My spiritual father is God, the creator of heaven and earth who loved us so much that he gave his only son to death, so that whoever believes in him would have eternal life.
I don't have any fatherly emotions to Charles Darwin, so I can only assume this statement is an attempt to dismiss the view without considering it in detail.
Thinking, thinking, thinking. Now linking
There are transitional fossils!
There are fish that live at that never set fin on land that ûse their fins for walking. Some catfish are able to walk on land without lung or limbs. The lung fish has both lungs and gills and ribs. They don't walk on land.
As for the half flatfish, all flatfish start life off with eyes on oppisite sides of their body and end with eyes on the same side. So all this fish shows is a baby becoming an adult.
Seals and sea lions.
The human ancester to modern human is easy to explain. For one thing it looked like us not like a chimp. The rest is micro-evolution not macro-evolution. The only reason to call this macro-evolution is to take god out of it.
The dawn horse to todays horse I can buy but that is micro-evolution not macro-evolution.
As I have said before it isn't a ,mammal until it produces milk for its young. Which means in a single generation said mammal has. To go from taking care of jts self at birth to taking care of its young at birth.