Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * - 3 votes

New Gun Law Push


  • Please log in to reply
245 replies to this topic

#31    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,992 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 23 September 2013 - 02:29 PM

View Postaztek, on 23 September 2013 - 02:22 PM, said:

lol, you are slower that i though, it shows who bought a gun, and that means they have a gun

Right. That shows who has bought a gun from a dealer, importer or manufacturer or in a state that requires a gun purchasing permit. It does not show who has bought a gun at a flea market, got it as wedding present or from a private person, as possible in 38 states. (Only in 12 you need actually a permit to buy a gun from private parties and a background check, the rest are a free-for all as long as you don't go to a federal licensed dealer/manufacturer/importer).

And we had this a dozen times by now, time you learned it.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#32    aztek

aztek

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,263 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2006

Posted 23 September 2013 - 02:34 PM

neither will your registry.
a got hundreds of dollars a month saying we don't need new registry, cuz guns used in crimes are 99% illegal, and wont be in it anyway, now how much of your money say we need the registry??

RESIDENT TROLL.

#33    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,992 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 23 September 2013 - 02:37 PM

View Postaztek, on 23 September 2013 - 02:34 PM, said:

neither will your registry.
a got hundreds of dollars a month saying we don't need new registry, cuz guns used in crimes are 99% illegal, and wont be in it anyway, now how much of your money say we need the registry??

And you are trying to tell me that the illegal guns come out of thin air?

I have 100 dollars that say that they are bought in a vast majority from normal citizens in one of those 38 states by people willing to sell them to anybody as long as they make enough money on it. And we have no way of stopping that.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#34    aztek

aztek

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,263 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2006

Posted 23 September 2013 - 02:41 PM

at this point logic is simple, all new laws and regulations didn't help 1 bit. and i will do everything in my power to not let anymore useless legislations, restrictions, and registry's  take place. your ideas are proven useless, i will not let you experiment anymore.

you seem to not get concept of money=politics, my money work at nra ila, where does your 100 work????

Edited by aztek, 23 September 2013 - 02:42 PM.

RESIDENT TROLL.

#35    Bama13

Bama13

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,744 posts
  • Joined:09 Aug 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Just Southeast of God's country

Posted 23 September 2013 - 02:48 PM

View Postquestionmark, on 23 September 2013 - 01:55 PM, said:

To know who has a brain damage and a gun first you need a registry of brain damaged and second a registry of who has a gun, now who is against the second?

You don't have to know who has a gun, just have to insure that people that have "brain damage" do not have guns. So you check the "brain damaged" folks to insure that they don't have guns. No reason to bother non-"brain damaged" folks.

" Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything —you can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him" - Robert Heinlein

#36    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,992 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 23 September 2013 - 02:55 PM

View PostBama13, on 23 September 2013 - 02:48 PM, said:

You don't have to know who has a gun, just have to insure that people that have "brain damage" do not have guns. So you check the "brain damaged" folks to insure that they don't have guns. No reason to bother non-"brain damaged" folks.

That works in 12 states, not in the other 38 because nobody checks anymore if the gun is bought at a flea market (to not to say gun show). And in those 12 states non-brain damage folks are already bothered.

The only way to dry out the black market is to be able to trace a gun to his last legit owner, and that owners must tell authorities that he/she sold the gun.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#37    aztek

aztek

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,263 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2006

Posted 23 September 2013 - 03:12 PM

lol, well it ain't happening.  get over it.  you will never dry out black market by restriction, entire world history tells you that, the only way to dry it out is to eliminate need for it. and prohibition, and absence of big tobacco black market, should tell you something. yet you stock in you proven wrong delusions.

Edited by aztek, 23 September 2013 - 03:16 PM.

RESIDENT TROLL.

#38    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,992 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 23 September 2013 - 03:14 PM

View Postaztek, on 23 September 2013 - 03:12 PM, said:

lol, well it ain't happening.  get over it.

cause the NRA won't allow it, we know.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#39    aztek

aztek

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,263 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2006

Posted 23 September 2013 - 04:14 PM

View Postquestionmark, on 23 September 2013 - 03:14 PM, said:

cause the NRA won't allow it, we know.
yes we wont

RESIDENT TROLL.

#40    F3SS

F3SS

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 6,745 posts
  • Joined:11 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, Pa

Posted 23 September 2013 - 04:33 PM

You two need to get in the ring.

Posted Image

#41    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,992 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 23 September 2013 - 05:05 PM

View PostF3SS, on 23 September 2013 - 04:33 PM, said:

You two need to get in the ring.

Why? I love it to bring him to admit that where he said I was lying I was actually being pretty factual. Like with his last statement :devil:

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#42    CRYSiiSx2

CRYSiiSx2

    Astral Projection

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 686 posts
  • Joined:06 Mar 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan, USA

Posted 23 September 2013 - 05:08 PM

When is everyone going to realize you can't argue with a Google Expert.  Anything you say questionmark will hit to Google search and will become an "expert" in 5 minutes at any matter.

Posted Image
NRA - PROTECT THE 2ND AMENDMENT
my twitter @sktm06

#43    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,992 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 23 September 2013 - 05:10 PM

View PostCRYSiiSx2, on 23 September 2013 - 05:08 PM, said:

When is everyone going to realize you can't argue with a Google Expert.  Anything you say questionmark will hit to Google search and will become an "expert" in 5 minutes at any matter.

I don't need google, my memory always was good. I just have to hear it once.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#44    Agent0range

Agent0range

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,441 posts
  • Joined:10 Apr 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pennsylvania

Posted 23 September 2013 - 05:18 PM

I was unaware that the information of experts was obtained spontaneously, as opposed to through research.  Guess you learn something new everyday..


#45    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 35,992 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 23 September 2013 - 05:21 PM

View PostAgent0range, on 23 September 2013 - 05:18 PM, said:

I was unaware that the information of experts was obtained spontaneously, as opposed to through research.  Guess you learn something new everyday..

If you mean me: I take offense at the adjective "expert" I never was, never will be. I am a generalist, meaning I know enough of most everything to know when somebody is talking BS, but not enough to be an authority.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users