Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * * * 1 votes

Guinness: Irish 'Arthur's Day' condemned

guinness arthurs day dublin diageo

  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 40,033 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • Sometimes it's better to keep the mystery unexplained.

Posted 25 September 2013 - 01:48 PM

An attempt to establish an Irish day devoted to Guinness risks becoming a major PR hangover for the drinks giant Diageo, before even a drop is drunk.

Critics, including musicians and doctors, have accused "Arthur's Day" this Thursday of promoting drunkenness.

The event was conceived in 2009 to mark 250 years since the first pint of Guinness was brewed in Dublin.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...europe-24238550

Posted Image

#2    Jeffertonturner

Jeffertonturner

    Hero Squad

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,098 posts
  • Joined:21 Jan 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Brunswick, Canada

  • I may not be the smartest, or the best looking, or the most successful but...what was I saying? I'm depressed.

Posted 25 September 2013 - 02:20 PM

What's wrong with promoting drunkenness?

Cheers

;)

Edited by Jeffertonturner, 25 September 2013 - 02:21 PM.

~Life goes by pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while -and do whatever you want all the time -you can miss it.~

#3    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 40,033 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • Sometimes it's better to keep the mystery unexplained.

Posted 25 September 2013 - 02:39 PM

View PostJeffertonturner, on 25 September 2013 - 02:20 PM, said:

What's wrong with promoting drunkenness?

Cheers

;)
tut tut.........*throws pack of Aspirins your way*

:P

Posted Image

#4    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 11,857 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 25 September 2013 - 08:56 PM

Cynical marketing in disguise as a national celebration - its what the Irish do best. Look to St.Pats day for your example.

Seriously - Ireland is just starting to have a serious conversation with itself about its antisocial drinking and Arthurs day doesn't help. It seems there are two types of Irishman, problem drinkers and abstaining problem drinkers.

Br Cornelius

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson

#5    TSS

TSS

    Observer

  • Closed
  • 5,750 posts
  • Joined:30 Jun 2008

Posted 25 September 2013 - 09:03 PM

Good grief - is there anything left that people don't find a reason to complain about! :/


#6    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 11,857 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 26 September 2013 - 07:16 AM

View PostSky Scanner, on 25 September 2013 - 09:03 PM, said:

Good grief - is there anything left that people don't find a reason to complain about! :/
If you were an alcoholic do you think it would be appropriate to invite you out for a drink to celebrate the fact ?

Here's a few sobering facts about the problem;

Quote

Rates of alcoholic liver disease per 100,000 adults increased by 190% from 28.3 in 1995 to 82.2 in 2007, according to figures published in the journal, Alcohol and Alcoholism.
The figures also reveal “considerable increases” of alcohol liver disease amoung younger age groups.
Among 15-34 years olds, the rate of ALD discharges increased by 247%, while for the 35-49 age group, the rate increased by 224%.
This is a “worrying trend” but is “not surprising”, researchers found, as 18-29-year-old drinkers have the highest level of alcohol consumption among Irish drinkers and two-fifths binge drink weekly.
However, the figures show that the majority of ALD discharges are still among the 35 to 64 age groups.
Over two-fifths (43%) of all discharges were aged 50-64 years; 35% were 35-49 years old, 16% were aged over 65 years, while 6% were 15-34 years old.

http://alcoholirelan...-almost-treble/

Br Cornelius

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson

#7    Yes_Man

Yes_Man

    hi

  • Member
  • 8,628 posts
  • Joined:22 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portsmouth

Posted 26 September 2013 - 08:04 AM

People complaining have nothing else to do


#8    Norbert Dentressangle

Norbert Dentressangle

    A bit dull

  • Member
  • 26,406 posts
  • Joined:09 May 2005
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tanybwlch

  • Vampires are people too.

Posted 26 September 2013 - 08:52 AM

Oh, spare us from dreary puritans with social consciences, please.

Life is a hideous business, and from the background behind what we know of it peer daemoniacal hints of truth which make it sometimes a thousandfold more hideous.

H. P. Lovecraft.


:cat:


#9    TSS

TSS

    Observer

  • Closed
  • 5,750 posts
  • Joined:30 Jun 2008

Posted 26 September 2013 - 09:20 AM

View PostBr Cornelius, on 26 September 2013 - 07:16 AM, said:

If you were an alcoholic do you think it would be appropriate to invite you out for a drink to celebrate the fact ?


Well this is where you and me differ - you like everything micro-managed, the risk factor removed from everything, and everyone legislated and curtailed. Sod everyone else, because if someone slips through the net then everyone should pay the price for it eh?! No thanks, I favor personal responsibility, minimal interference. Sure, have the mechanisms in place to help those that struggle with addiction, but don't stop everyone else from doing what they want just because some struggle to find a happy medium.

This is my life, not yours, i'll take responsibility for my actions, and you do the same with yours I say!


#10    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 11,857 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 27 September 2013 - 11:49 AM

View PostSky Scanner, on 26 September 2013 - 09:20 AM, said:

Well this is where you and me differ - you like everything micro-managed, the risk factor removed from everything, and everyone legislated and curtailed. Sod everyone else, because if someone slips through the net then everyone should pay the price for it eh?! No thanks, I favor personal responsibility, minimal interference. Sure, have the mechanisms in place to help those that struggle with addiction, but don't stop everyone else from doing what they want just because some struggle to find a happy medium.

This is my life, not yours, i'll take responsibility for my actions, and you do the same with yours I say!
So you see no role for society to manage its significant social problems ?
You think 100's or thousands of teenagers suffering liver failure as an acceptable cost of preserving the freedom to abuse your body.

The logic fails when society has to pick up the bill for alcoholism - when your tax pounds have to flow into clearing up the social mess that ensues.  When more important things don't get done as a consequence.

Br Cornelius

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson

#11    TSS

TSS

    Observer

  • Closed
  • 5,750 posts
  • Joined:30 Jun 2008

Posted 27 September 2013 - 03:57 PM

View PostBr Cornelius, on 27 September 2013 - 11:49 AM, said:

So you see no role for society to manage its significant social problems ?
You think 100's or thousands of teenagers suffering liver failure as an acceptable cost of preserving the freedom to abuse your body.

The logic fails when society has to pick up the bill for alcoholism - when your tax pounds have to flow into clearing up the social mess that ensues.  When more important things don't get done as a consequence.

Br Cornelius

Have you ever listened to yourself? seriously, step back and think about it rather then jumping to knee-jerk reactions of 'ban it'. If you were really concerned about the young damaging their livers then why not propose a sensible solution, you know like raising the drinking age to 21, legislate to stop pubs selling to people who are clearly just knocking them back in order to get drunk quickly.....but nope, lets ban 'arthur's day' and punish everyone just because some people can't control themselves...

Actually, your idea doesn't solve societies ills, what it does it breed resentment, and mistrust of those who try to dictate our lives to us.

When I was little, my grandfather told me a very simple lesson in life "everything in moderation Chris, everything in moderation"...I do all the things society says are bad for me, and the things people would like banned (including pastimes)...and i'm still here, no medical problems at all. That's not because i'm lucky, or somehow genetically breed to be somehow indestructible...it's because I moderate what I do, and if it goes wrong anyway then 'hey ho' no problem, I knew the risks and choose to take them.

I don't expect anybody to be stopped from doing what they want with their life because of my actions - and vice versa. I fully support though programmes and research into genuine addiction (dopamine levels etc)...and giving the people with those problems individual help (since most addictions are linked to an individual cause anyway)....what I am fully against though (and always will be) is legislation designed to stop everyone, in order to not tempt a few...

Edited by Sky Scanner, 27 September 2013 - 03:58 PM.


#12    rashore

rashore

    Telekinetic

  • 7,540 posts
  • Joined:26 Feb 2010
  • Gender:Female

Posted 27 September 2013 - 07:25 PM

Dunno what it's like over in Ireland... But I'm not too sure how Arthur's day is that much different than St. Patrick's day, Cinco de Mayo, Thanksgiving and black Friday, Christmas, pretty much every Thursday and Sunday from September to February for football (especially Superbowl Sunday), and probably other days for all the other sports the rest of the year, Labor Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Halloween, Mardi Gras, New Years Eve, and of course all of October for Oktoberfest here in the U.S.. I'm sure I'm probably forgetting some drinking days too.


#13    Artaxerxes

Artaxerxes

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 303 posts
  • Joined:10 Jul 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tennessee, United States

Posted 27 September 2013 - 11:19 PM

Well I think it's a great name for a day!   :clap:

Arthur

Edited by Artaxerxes, 27 September 2013 - 11:19 PM.


#14    Br Cornelius

Br Cornelius

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 11,857 posts
  • Joined:13 Aug 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Eire

  • Stupid Monkeys.

    Life Sucks.
    Get over it.

Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:03 AM

View PostSky Scanner, on 27 September 2013 - 03:57 PM, said:

Have you ever listened to yourself? seriously, step back and think about it rather then jumping to knee-jerk reactions of 'ban it'. If you were really concerned about the young damaging their livers then why not propose a sensible solution, you know like raising the drinking age to 21, legislate to stop pubs selling to people who are clearly just knocking them back in order to get drunk quickly.....but nope, lets ban 'arthur's day' and punish everyone just because some people can't control themselves...

Actually, your idea doesn't solve societies ills, what it does it breed resentment, and mistrust of those who try to dictate our lives to us.

When I was little, my grandfather told me a very simple lesson in life "everything in moderation Chris, everything in moderation"...I do all the things society says are bad for me, and the things people would like banned (including pastimes)...and i'm still here, no medical problems at all. That's not because i'm lucky, or somehow genetically breed to be somehow indestructible...it's because I moderate what I do, and if it goes wrong anyway then 'hey ho' no problem, I knew the risks and choose to take them.

I don't expect anybody to be stopped from doing what they want with their life because of my actions - and vice versa. I fully support though programmes and research into genuine addiction (dopamine levels etc)...and giving the people with those problems individual help (since most addictions are linked to an individual cause anyway)....what I am fully against though (and always will be) is legislation designed to stop everyone, in order to not tempt a few...
You really don't have a clue about what is going on on the ground. The national sentiment in ireland has been overwhelmingly against Arthers day for the reasons I have discussed. If it isn't banned by the government due to public demand - Diageo will withdraw it due to the huge wave of adverse publicity it has generated for them.

You really haven't got a clue on this one.

Br Cornelius

I believe nothing, but I have my suspicions.

Robert Anton Wilson

#15    TSS

TSS

    Observer

  • Closed
  • 5,750 posts
  • Joined:30 Jun 2008

Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:30 AM

View PostBr Cornelius, on 28 September 2013 - 09:03 AM, said:

You really don't have a clue about what is going on on the ground. The national sentiment in ireland has been overwhelmingly against Arthers day for the reasons I have discussed. If it isn't banned by the government due to public demand - Diageo will withdraw it due to the huge wave of adverse publicity it has generated for them.

You really haven't got a clue on this one.

Br Cornelius

Well with any luck common sense will prevail and it will go ahead anyway. Those that don't like it will just have to ignore it. Problem solved.

Edited by Sky Scanner, 28 September 2013 - 09:38 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users