Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

gravity sims apps i have played with


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1    danielost

danielost

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,828 posts
  • Joined:26 Nov 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the only known inhabited planet in the universe

Posted 01 October 2013 - 11:43 PM

I have messed around with a couple of gravity apps. One in which the stars move and one where they are fixed.  What I have seen is that a star system with two or more stars is not a good pace for a planet to be in.  No matter how far apart the stars are the planets are eaten or flung out into space.  Granted these weren't 3d sims.  The other thing is in the sim where the stars are moving. Anything bigger than a binary system is also unstable, the other stars get thrown out.


It has been said that a planet can't do a figuare eight orbit around two stars.  But, in the fixed star app the planets do much more complicated orbits.

I have seen them do a barrel race orbit around three stars.  They have reversed orbits.  They ve stayed between the two stars not orbiting either, just kind of rocking back and forth.  At least for a while.  I have also seen them just orbit the two stars in a normal kind of orbit.  But, they all end up being eaten or throwb out of the system.

I am a Mormon.  If I don't use Mormons believe, those my beliefs only.
I do not go to church haven't for thirty years.
There are other Mormons on this site. So if I have misspoken about the beliefs. I welcome their input.
I am not perfect and never will be. I do strive to be true to myself. I do my best to stay true to the Mormon faith. Thanks for caring and if you don't peace be with you.

#2    Waspie_Dwarf

Waspie_Dwarf

    Space Cadet

  • 34,222 posts
  • Joined:03 Mar 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bexleyheath, Kent, UK

  • We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.

    Oscar Wilde

Posted 02 October 2013 - 12:15 AM

View Postdanielost, on 01 October 2013 - 11:43 PM, said:

But, they all end up being eaten or throwb out of the system.

For a long time astronomers believed that this would be the most likely outcome in reality too. It was thought that such planets were unlikely. Of course now we know that planets can and do exist around binary systems.

Kepler 16 (see HERE), Kepler 34, Kepler 35 and Kepler 47 (see HERE) are all binary systems with planets.

"Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-boggingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the street to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space." - The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams 1952 - 2001

Posted Image
Click on button

#3    danielost

danielost

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 31,828 posts
  • Joined:26 Nov 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the only known inhabited planet in the universe

Posted 03 October 2013 - 06:28 PM

This would seem to mean either we don't know all of the rules or some force outside of nature is haveing an affect on these systems.

It would also indicate there are trillions of rogue planets out there.  They may be as numerious as inhabitable planets.

I am a Mormon.  If I don't use Mormons believe, those my beliefs only.
I do not go to church haven't for thirty years.
There are other Mormons on this site. So if I have misspoken about the beliefs. I welcome their input.
I am not perfect and never will be. I do strive to be true to myself. I do my best to stay true to the Mormon faith. Thanks for caring and if you don't peace be with you.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users