Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Two Ghost Hunters Views On the Paranormal


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1    Brian Topp

Brian Topp

    Dynamic Interactions Coordinator Of Paradoxes.

  • Member
  • 3,090 posts
  • Joined:10 Sep 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Year next Tuesday!

Posted 12 October 2013 - 01:01 AM

Quote

“I don't believe someone when they say they don't believe in ghosts, I think they're just scared,” ghost hunter Minckee Gerhold told The Local. Gerhold, along with partner Alex Schollain, are the otherworldly experts Berlin calls on when something spooky is afoot.

And they are in high demand having worked on 40 cases in castles, sprawling city apartments, old hospitals as well as farms, since full-time chef Schollain began advertising ghost hunting services.

Read More: http://www.thelocal....1011-52357.html

[Please note, I the OP do not surport this claim in any way,  I only bring articles for conversation]

Edited by Saru, 12 October 2013 - 08:24 AM.
Reduced text - please do not copy and paste entire articles

It is easier to claim it is paranormal than taking the hard route to find out what really happened.


#2    Skep B

Skep B

    Savant of Depravity

  • Member
  • 5,563 posts
  • Joined:02 Aug 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Duuuuuuuuuuuude

Posted 12 October 2013 - 01:38 AM

Well, this guy just made my list of people I want to hit with a pillowcase full of poop

When you know what a man loves, you know what can kill him


#3    Brian Topp

Brian Topp

    Dynamic Interactions Coordinator Of Paradoxes.

  • Member
  • 3,090 posts
  • Joined:10 Sep 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Year next Tuesday!

Posted 12 October 2013 - 01:43 AM

View PostSkepticalB, on 12 October 2013 - 01:38 AM, said:

Well, this guy just made my list of people I want to hit with a pillowcase full of poop
i couldn't find any of his evidence

It is easier to claim it is paranormal than taking the hard route to find out what really happened.


#4    Skep B

Skep B

    Savant of Depravity

  • Member
  • 5,563 posts
  • Joined:02 Aug 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Duuuuuuuuuuuude

Posted 12 October 2013 - 01:48 AM

It's right next to the hoverboard I build with Nth metal and my original copy of the necronomicon

When you know what a man loves, you know what can kill him


#5    sinewave

sinewave

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,124 posts
  • Joined:23 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Midwest

  • Belief proves nothing. Show me the science.

Posted 12 October 2013 - 07:08 PM

Wow, and they even have all of the right tools.  They must be pros.


#6    Draco20

Draco20

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,337 posts
  • Joined:02 Jun 2013

Posted 12 October 2013 - 07:45 PM

“I don't believe someone when they say they don't believe in ghosts, I think they're just scared,”

I do not necesserely agree with that, I think some people are more rational and will need further studies and proofs and a consensus among the scientific communauties to accept this phenomenon. It was a bit provocative, unless said in a humoristic way, but it may offend some people.

Anyway, it's just one of a tremendous amount of groups created around the world after 2004 and they seem to establish themselves in Germany. No doubt this article will give them a good publicity.

Berlin is a place full of memories of the past, I would be surpised if there is no paranormal phenomenon going on there.

Edited by sam_comm, 12 October 2013 - 07:52 PM.


#7    sinewave

sinewave

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,124 posts
  • Joined:23 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Midwest

  • Belief proves nothing. Show me the science.

Posted 12 October 2013 - 08:16 PM

The paranormal likely only exists in our minds.  Do I feel the terror of the past as I walk the streets of Berlin?  You bet.  Is it a real force surrounding me and compelling me to fee that way?  No, it is due to my understanding of what happened there since the turn of the last century.   All of that history is amplified by still-evident scorching and shrapnel damage on many of the buildings and the vast open areas that were once densely populated. Then there are the reminders of the wall that divided the city and the oppressive ideology that put it there.  Being sensible sensitive humans is enough to make us feel the reality of a place.  We don't have to give ghosts credit for that.

Edited by sinewave, 12 October 2013 - 08:17 PM.


#8    Draco20

Draco20

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,337 posts
  • Joined:02 Jun 2013

Posted 12 October 2013 - 08:53 PM

@sinawe

The association of various paranormal phenomenon to the ghosts or spirits of dead people is a theory among others. In fact, modern parapsychology is leaning toward these been psychic phenomenon of the human minds. It's very possible. Poltergeist are now generally accepted in this field of research to be psychic phenomenon..

It's possible that what many call residual haunting is in fact an ability or a mechanisim of the the human mind to perceive events of the past.

But I don't think we can rule out the possiblity of intelligent entities or spirit of the dead. We know nothing about the after life and very little of life itself for that matter and therefore how can we draw a conclusion? How do we know it isn't possible that there can't be some sort of coming back? I do not know.

Edited by sam_comm, 12 October 2013 - 08:57 PM.


#9    Skep B

Skep B

    Savant of Depravity

  • Member
  • 5,563 posts
  • Joined:02 Aug 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Duuuuuuuuuuuude

Posted 12 October 2013 - 10:07 PM

wow, you went so far disbelieving you came back around to buying into a paranormal answer.

I don't think I've seen that one before.

When you know what a man loves, you know what can kill him


#10    Draco20

Draco20

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,337 posts
  • Joined:02 Jun 2013

Posted 12 October 2013 - 11:42 PM

View PostSkepticalB, on 12 October 2013 - 10:07 PM, said:

wow, you went so far disbelieving you came back around to buying into a paranormal answer.

I don't think I've seen that one before.

You seem to have misunderstood me, my above post wasn't about disbelieving and buying.

I have very little doubt about the legitimacy of some of these phenomenon. I've never experienced anything myself but have seen various documentations and accounts which lead me to think that some cases are legitimate and not all is frauds and lies.

That said, then there is the interpretations of them. I am not convinced that what we call a haunting is GrandMa coming back and seek attentions. The Human mind is fascinating and the theory that Humans might project their consciousness and create various phenomenon is not without sens, actually it's a very interesting possibility. Other researchers, such as John Keel and Jacques Vallé speak about Ultraterrestrial basically a form of lifes or entites, manifesting themselves in various guises such as Aliens, Ghosts, Werewolves ect. that may account for what people have claimed to see overtime.

I do not fully ''buy'' or ''disbelieve'' any of them.They're avenues that may or may not offer possible explanations of the unkown. At any rate, I cannot say that there is nothing more to it than frauds, lies and mesinterpretations. I am what can be called an ''open minded'' with regard to what we might not have fully discovered/understood yet.

Edited by sam_comm, 12 October 2013 - 11:50 PM.


#11    Skep B

Skep B

    Savant of Depravity

  • Member
  • 5,563 posts
  • Joined:02 Aug 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Duuuuuuuuuuuude

Posted 12 October 2013 - 11:56 PM

Uh huh,

well we seem to have a divergence then, I always look to science, every time, in every situation i've ever come across, science has the answers

I do see the irony in saying that, since I've often stated that anecdotal evidence means nothing.

But, i understand, you're open to different sources that do these things, not believing in the supernatural so much as believing in things that would be defined as paranormal

When you know what a man loves, you know what can kill him


#12    sinewave

sinewave

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,124 posts
  • Joined:23 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Midwest

  • Belief proves nothing. Show me the science.

Posted 13 October 2013 - 12:00 AM

View Postsam_comm, on 12 October 2013 - 08:53 PM, said:

@sinawe

The association of various paranormal phenomenon to the ghosts or spirits of dead people is a theory among others. In fact, modern parapsychology is leaning toward these been psychic phenomenon of the human minds. It's very possible. Poltergeist are now generally accepted in this field of research to be psychic phenomenon..

It's possible that what many call residual haunting is in fact an ability or a mechanisim of the the human mind to perceive events of the past.

But I don't think we can rule out the possiblity of intelligent entities or spirit of the dead. We know nothing about the after life and very little of life itself for that matter and therefore how can we draw a conclusion? How do we know it isn't possible that there can't be some sort of coming back? I do not know.


It is important to note that parapsychology has been largely the domain of small, privately funded institutes for the last 30 years for good reason.  Despite decades of research done by major universities, no reproducible evidence was ever found to support the existence of para-psychological phenomena in humans.  Of course that does not mean it does not exist just that no one has ever successfully demonstrated it does.  From a purely scientific point of view the phenomenon has no traction.

Since the disillusionment of government research programs and university parapsychology departments, private institutes have not fared any better.

It is not the role of science to rule out the afterlife but rather the obligation of those who would attempt to employ science to have us accept it to demonstrate it does exist.  Leaving out science makes this a matter of faith which I will not debate.  :)


#13    Draco20

Draco20

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,337 posts
  • Joined:02 Jun 2013

Posted 13 October 2013 - 06:55 PM

View Postsinewave, on 13 October 2013 - 12:00 AM, said:

It is important to note that parapsychology has been largely the domain of small, privately funded institutes for the last 30 years for good reason.  Despite decades of research done by major universities, no reproducible evidence was ever found to support the existence of para-psychological phenomena in humans.  Of course that does not mean it does not exist just that no one has ever successfully demonstrated it does.  From a purely scientific point of view the phenomenon has no traction.

Also, I think it has a lot to do with the bad reputation of the paranormal and supernatural among the scientific community. Most of them think that there is nothing more to it than frauds, lies and mesinterpretations of natural and known phenomenon. Parapsychology is ridiculed and considered a ''pseudoscience'' by many skeptical scientists. The lack of reproducable results is an issue and cause of discussions, that's for sure, but there has been interesting results and the researchers have to deal with phenomenon which are in themselves illusive, inconsistant and not necesserely reproducable in a controlled environements. That is where a rift with the traditional science methodology might appear but it is not in my view a valid reason to give it up. But yeah, as of all bodies of studies and researches, they're mostly dependent of public and/or private found. The Rhine Reserach Center for instance is nonetheless still in good shape. For all we know, these Parapsychologists might study a science of tomorrow with the tools and materials of today.

An interesting book I am about to read will treat of this very subject: Parapsychology: The Controversial Science by Dr. Richard Broughton

View Postsinewave, on 13 October 2013 - 12:00 AM, said:

It is not the role of science to rule out the afterlife but rather the obligation of those who would attempt to employ science to have us accept it to demonstrate it does exist.  Leaving out science makes this a matter of faith which I will not debate.  :)

I do think that the quest of understanding death and what may possibly come after, if anything, is a legitimate one. For some it's a cause of concerns and endless interrogations, for others it influences how they live. Researches can be done in a scientific way, Mary Roach, a science writter speaks about this very subject in: Spooks: Sciences Tackles The Afterlife. As far as I know, several scientists around the world have tried to find evidences and discover what comes after life.

Edited by sam_comm, 13 October 2013 - 07:23 PM.


#14    sinewave

sinewave

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,124 posts
  • Joined:23 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Midwest

  • Belief proves nothing. Show me the science.

Posted 13 October 2013 - 09:49 PM

View Postsam_comm, on 13 October 2013 - 06:55 PM, said:

Also, I think it has a lot to do with the bad reputation of the paranormal and supernatural among the scientific community. Most of them think that there is nothing more to it than frauds, lies and mesinterpretations of natural and known phenomenon. Parapsychology is ridiculed and considered a ''pseudoscience'' by many skeptical scientists. The lack of reproducable results is an issue and cause of discussions, that's for sure, but there has been interesting results and the researchers have to deal with phenomenon which are in themselves illusive, inconsistant and not necesserely reproducable in a controlled environements. That is where a rift with the traditional science methodology might appear but it is not in my view a valid reason to give it up. But yeah, as of all bodies of studies and researches, they're mostly dependent of public and/or private found. The Rhine Reserach Center for instance is nonetheless still in good shape. For all we know, these Parapsychologists might study a science of tomorrow with the tools and materials of today.

An interesting book I am about to read will treat of this very subject: Parapsychology: The Controversial Science by Dr. Richard Broughton



I do think that the quest of understanding death and what may possibly come after, if anything, is a legitimate one. For some it's a cause of concerns and endless interrogations, for others it influences how they live. Researches can be done in a scientific way, Mary Roach, a science writter speaks about this very subject in: Spooks: Sciences Tackles The Afterlife. As far as I know, several scientists around the world have tried to find evidences and discover what comes after life.


Unfortunately, the bad reputation is a function of fervent belief with no science to back it up.  Proponents of Psi are much like gamblers living on the thrill of one or two anomalous runs out of hundreds.  Any trial that was even slightly above chance was celebrated as a breakthrough only to be statistically annihilated later.  Bad science and fraud were very common and I suspect that has not changed much.  Fortunately the pursuit is no longer sucking up tax dollars or occupying large amounts of space on college campuses.   The big question is, if this ability does exist it would be a highly developed neurological function evolved as part of the survival imperative of the species, why then is it so illusive?   The best evidence so far suggests the ability simply does not exist.


#15    Draco20

Draco20

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 2,337 posts
  • Joined:02 Jun 2013

Posted 14 October 2013 - 12:33 AM

You have a point, the bad reputation may be caused by the lack of science with regard to the paranormal and supernatural. The problem is, a Scientist cannot have an interest in this field of research without loosing his/her credibility and reputation. Therefore few are willing to be alienated by their collegues for speaking outloud their controversial views.

That's why I think this kind of contempt is unhealthy. A science must be objective, neutral with no personal bias if it is to be genuine. Objectivity should not be subject to a scientific consensus.

Have you heard of Dr Brian Josephson, a physicist with a 1973 physic Nobel prize?
Unfortunalety for him, he wasn't invited at the 2010 Foundation Of Physics after he stated that it may be interesting to study the paranormal with Quantum mechanics. A letter adressed to him stated: ''It has come to my attention that one of your principal research interests is the paranormal ... in my view, it would not be appropriate for someone with such research interests to attend a scientific conference."

He also became a target for his view on Parapsychology but anyway I can't agree more with his statement:

"if scientists as a whole denounce an idea, this should not necessarily be taken as proof that the said idea is absurd; rather, one should examine carefully the alleged grounds for such opinions and judge how well these stand up to detailed scrutiny."

As for psychic abilities studied in Parapsychology, my opinion is that the inconsistencies and the elusivity may very well point to the possibility that the subjects have no counscious control over them. An ability that has not been succesfully developped and understood may come and go and manifest itself inconsistently.

Therefore if the subject is in a carefully controlled environment, with a pressure to perform and give concrete results, that will lead in most cases to unsuccessful experiments or interesting anomalies, glimpses of the secrets of the Human mind yet to be unravelled but now unsufficient to provide demonstrable proofs. :)

Edited by sam_comm, 14 October 2013 - 12:41 AM.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users