Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Patterson-Gimlin-Film, a promo stunt?


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1    Jacques Terreur

Jacques Terreur

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,435 posts
  • Joined:07 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AREA 69

Posted 24 October 2013 - 06:06 AM

Is this evidence the whole thing was a hoax or is it a hoax itself?
I just trawled this out of the internet, apologies if this was actually discussed before:

Posted Image


#2    Sir Wearer of Hats

Sir Wearer of Hats

    SCIENCE!

  • Member
  • 15,180 posts
  • Joined:08 Nov 2008
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queensland, Australia.

Posted 24 October 2013 - 07:15 AM

Well that's the nail in the coffin for the argument that it couldn't be a movie costume (I recall someone trotting out the Bigfoot from Sixty Million Dollar Man and saying "look at what the best Hollywood can do").

I must not fear. Fear is the Mind-Killer. It is the little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.
I will permit it to pass over me and to move through me. And when it is gone I will turn the inner eye to see it's path.
When the fear is gone, there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

You may think you're cool, but you'll never be as cool as Peter Capaldi with an electric guitar, on a tank, playing the Doctor Who theme.

#3    BettyTheYeti

BettyTheYeti

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 86 posts
  • Joined:04 Oct 2013
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:At home

Posted 24 October 2013 - 08:28 AM

Easily faked. More easily than faking a Sasquatch film, that has stood up to years of scrutiny.


#4    keninsc

keninsc

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 3,234 posts
  • Joined:08 Mar 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The problem with people who have no vices is that generally you can be pretty sure they're going to have some pretty annoying virtues. Liz Taylor

Posted 24 October 2013 - 02:31 PM

No notary seal either, could be a fake without some back ground on where it came from and it's chain of custody.


#5    Jacques Terreur

Jacques Terreur

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,435 posts
  • Joined:07 Dec 2004
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:AREA 69

Posted 24 October 2013 - 04:03 PM

i found it after reading the wikipedia entry for the Patterson-Gimlin-Film, which says:

"Radford alone had corroborative evidence: a $700 promissory note "for expenses in connection with filming of 'Bigfoot: Americas Abominable Snowman.'"[4] Patterson agreed to repay her $850, plus 5 percent of any profits from the movie. The movie was supposed to be a pseudo-documentary about cowboys being led by an old miner and a wise Indian tracker on a hunt for Bigfoot. The storyline called for Patterson, his Indian guide (Gimlin in a wig) and the cowboys to recall in flashbacks the stories of Fred Beck and others as they tracked the beast on horseback. Since the film was to be a pseudo-documentary, Patterson and Gimlin would have needed actors. Lacking a real cooperative Bigfoot, Patterson and Gimlin would have needed a costume to present a reasonable representation of the creature supposedly encountered."

after that, i tried to find that mentioned promissory note and that's what i dug out...


#6    OverSword

OverSword

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,128 posts
  • Joined:16 Oct 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle WA USA

  • I love chocolate

Posted 24 October 2013 - 05:05 PM

Convenient.  Fake.  IMO the patterson sasquatch footage is authentic.


#7    Myles

Myles

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,502 posts
  • Joined:08 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 October 2013 - 07:06 PM

View PostBettyTheYeti, on 24 October 2013 - 08:28 AM, said:

Easily faked. More easily than faking a Sasquatch film, that has stood up to years of scrutiny.

Most experts don't believe it to be a real bigfoot.    I'm not certain it has stood up very well.


#8    Myles

Myles

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,502 posts
  • Joined:08 Jan 2007
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 October 2013 - 07:08 PM

View PostJacques Terreur, on 24 October 2013 - 06:06 AM, said:

Is this evidence the whole thing was a hoax or is it a hoax itself?
I just trawled this out of the internet, apologies if this was actually discussed before:

Posted Image


Looks as real as the video to me.


#9    PersonFromPorlock

PersonFromPorlock

    Pooseycat

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,764 posts
  • Joined:15 May 2007
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • Few things do more harm than the belief that life should be Dramatic.

Posted 24 October 2013 - 09:02 PM

I'd be interested in seeing if Patterson characteristically misspells "adominable snowman" (as the author does twice here) elsewhere.


#10    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,409 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 24 October 2013 - 10:59 PM

Well the main reason he was in those woods was to film a snowman film.  He was even sued afterwards by the producers.

And lo and behold, he just happens to come across a bigfoot in the process.

"For me, it is better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."
                                                                                                                                           - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World:  Science as a Candle in the Dark

#11    keninsc

keninsc

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 3,234 posts
  • Joined:08 Mar 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The problem with people who have no vices is that generally you can be pretty sure they're going to have some pretty annoying virtues. Liz Taylor

Posted 25 October 2013 - 03:44 AM

OK,help me out here guys, but  as anyone seen this mystical before? Certainly seems like it would have surfaced before now. Least it seems that way to me.


#12    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,409 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 25 October 2013 - 02:52 PM

Here's the wiki entry detailing the story at hand:

http://en.wikipedia....son-Gimlin_film

Background

Patterson said he became interested in Bigfoot after reading an article about the creature by Ivan T. Sanderson in True magazine in December 1959.[2] Patterson's book, Do Abominable Snowmen of America Really Exist?, was self-published in 1966. The book has been characterized as "little more than a collection of newspaper clippings laced together with Patterson's circus-poster style prose."[3] It did, however, also include 20 pages of previously unpublished interviews and letters, 17 drawings by Patterson of the encounters described in the text, 5 hand-drawn maps (rare in subsequent Bigfoot books), and almost 20 photos and illustrations from other sources. It was reprinted in 2005 under the title The Bigfoot Film Controversy, with additional material by Chris Murphy.
Some decades after the Patterson–Gimlin film's publicity, Greg Long interviewed people who described Patterson as a liar, a conman, and sometimes worse. One of the pictures in Roger's book (him sitting next to a campfire, drinking a cup of coffee with his horse in the background) was actually taken in his back yard, not in Northern California as the caption claims. Pat Mason, Glen Koelling, Bob Swanson and Vilma Radford claimed Patterson never repaid loans they made to him for a Bigfoot movie Roger was planning. Later, records show that Bob Gimlin sued DeAtley and Patterson's widow, Patricia, in 1975, claiming he was not receiving his share of the film's proceeds. Radford alone had corroborative evidence: a $700 promissory note "for expenses in connection with filming of 'Bigfoot: Americas Abominable Snowman.'"[4] Patterson agreed to repay her $850, plus 5 percent of any profits from the movie. The movie was supposed to be a pseudo-documentary about cowboys being led by an old miner and a wise Indian tracker on a hunt for Bigfoot. The storyline called for Patterson, his Indian guide (Gimlin in a wig) and the cowboys to recall in flashbacks the stories of Fred Beck and others as they tracked the beast on horseback. Since the film was to be a pseudo-documentary, Patterson and Gimlin would have needed actors. Lacking a real cooperative Bigfoot, Patterson and Gimlin would have needed a costume to present a reasonable representation of the creature supposedly encountered.
According to Jerry Merritt, both he and Roger tried to attract investors to help further fund his Bigfoot movie. They were not successful at this. Later, after Patterson died, Ron Olson (of ANE Studios) made a version of this and renamed it Sasquatch, the Legend of Bigfoot, while neglecting to give Patterson a co-writer credit. Roger drove to Hollywood often. He and Merritt visited various friends in the entertainment field including Gene Vincent and Ross Hagen (who starred on the late 1960s hit television show Daktari), and who worked with Patterson on his Bigfoot song they recorded in Hollywood.
Patterson and his friend Gimlin set out for the Six Rivers National Forest in northern California. Patterson chose the area because of intermittent reports of the creatures in the past and of their enormous footprints near there since 1958. The most recent of these reports was the nearby Blue Creek Mountain track find, which was investigated by journalist John Green, René Dahinden, and archaeologist Don Abbott on and after August 28, 1967.[5] This find was reported to Patterson soon thereafter by local resident Al Hodgson.
Though Gimlin says he doubted the existence of Sasquatch-like creatures, he agreed to Patterson's suggestion that they should not attempt to shoot any such creatures they might see. According to Grover Krantz[6] years later, Patterson and Gimlin agreed they should have tried to shoot the creature, both for financial gain and to silence naysayers.
Patterson's expensive 16 mm camera had been rented on May 13, but he had kept it longer than the contract had stipulated, and an arrest warrant had been issued for him on October 17.[7] This charge was ultimately dismissed after Patterson returned the camera in working order.[8]

"For me, it is better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."
                                                                                                                                           - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World:  Science as a Candle in the Dark

#13    keninsc

keninsc

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 3,234 posts
  • Joined:08 Mar 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The problem with people who have no vices is that generally you can be pretty sure they're going to have some pretty annoying virtues. Liz Taylor

Posted 25 October 2013 - 07:59 PM

Ok, I'm familiar with all that, but this is the first time I've seen the alleged promissory note. Are the signatures real? does it check out?

Edited by keninsc, 25 October 2013 - 08:00 PM.


#14    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Telekinetic

  • Member
  • 7,409 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 25 October 2013 - 11:29 PM

No clue if what's posted above is legit.  It seems to be fairly accepted that there was an agreement between the parties.  Whether or not this is the actual note, I have no clue.

"For me, it is better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."
                                                                                                                                           - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World:  Science as a Candle in the Dark

#15    Skep B

Skep B

    Savant of Depravity

  • Member
  • 5,563 posts
  • Joined:02 Aug 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Duuuuuuuuuuuude

Posted 26 October 2013 - 12:07 AM

from my admittedly 30 second look around that paper does seem to be legit

When you know what a man loves, you know what can kill him





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users