OK, In all of that long drawn out post, it was hard for me to see where you ended your opinion, and interjected the quotes from the publications that you used as example. What exactly are you saying here? Are you saying that a hypothosis and their experiments, CE-3, are set in stone?
First of all a hypothosis is nothing more than a best educational guess. Given all factors of probability.
So, if the Doctor's are going into any experiment with a preconcieved notion of what they want the end result to be, wouldn't that in fact muttle it's way through to their experiments, and then in turn, leaving their experminents to be nothing short of doomed and partial, to their benefit, before they even start?
I don't subscribe to any belief of Birth Memory Hypothesis (BMH) as the cause to such common things as nightmares, and abductions. The line is too easily crossed between the two. If you try hard enough you can find similarities between many different things. If you were to give me a hallucinogenic drug, of any kind, and put me in a room, with any type of suggestive material, wouldn't I then see what I was shown, or pushed towards? Or better yet, wouldn't I, if I was just plain imaginative, make up my own reality of any situation. And, wouldn't it be so real to me at the time, that it would then permenately leave it etched in my imaginative brain?
The idea of being hypnotised is all good, but it really leaves too many questions left to be answered than the person ever started with. You would have to trust that it was a completely controlled situation, being that the questions are not imposed to the person being 'under' before hand.
Reese