Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Snowden downloaded 1.7 million intel files


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 39,725 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 09 January 2014 - 07:57 PM

Washington Post said:


A classified Pentagon report concludes that former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden downloaded 1.7 million intelligence files from U.S. agencies in the single largest theft of secrets in the history of the United States, according to lawmakers.

The report, they said, asserts that the breach has the potential to put military personnel at risk.

“This report confirms my greatest fears — Snowden’s real acts of betrayal place America’s military men and women at greater risk. Snowden’s actions are likely to have lethal consequences for our troops in the field,” Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement.

Read more

And all this begs one question, regardless of what you think of Snowden: What kind of idiots are in charge of intelligence security in the country?

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#2    OverSword

OverSword

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,128 posts
  • Joined:16 Oct 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle WA USA

  • I love chocolate

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:05 PM

So some one can download that amount of data from the NSA without it being detected?  Well now I really feel good about them storing our private data :gun:


“This report confirms my greatest fears — Snowden’s real acts of betrayal place America’s military men and women at greater risk. Snowden’s actions are likely to have lethal consequences for our troops in the field,” Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement.


LOL!  @Mike Rogers.  Lets mention the troops to distract attention from who the real wrongdoers are here! :lol:   either our officials believe us to be very naive or they are very naive.

Edited by OverSword, 09 January 2014 - 08:08 PM.


#3    aztek

aztek

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,612 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2006

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:14 PM

well he was nsa contractor, posibly the network new he was downloading, and let him, if you tried or someone else, it might not.

RESIDENT TROLL.

#4    Awake2Chaos

Awake2Chaos

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Closed
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 862 posts
  • Joined:29 Dec 2013

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:24 PM

I would think that even contractors wouldn't be 'allowed' to download files?  Exactly for this reason....


#5    OverSword

OverSword

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 17,128 posts
  • Joined:16 Oct 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle WA USA

  • I love chocolate

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:30 PM

There should have been an alert due to the shear volume of files.  The IT dept. where I work would have noticed.


#6    aztek

aztek

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,612 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2006

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:33 PM

not if he was sys admin there, or had administartive priviliges. he was  the IT dep. there. he was not a guy from the street, he was supporting the network.

just like every network he had to log in, so the system knew he was on line,  he could have many legit reasons to copy files, and system let him, becouse he had pernision from network policy.

it really should not be a question how he did it. and with todays prosessors, he could have coppied millions of files way faster than 100 files could be transfered 50 years ago.

it is kinda silly to judge computers today by 50 years old standarts.

Edited by aztek, 09 January 2014 - 08:59 PM.

RESIDENT TROLL.

#7    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 39,725 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:35 PM

View PostOverSword, on 09 January 2014 - 08:30 PM, said:

There should have been an alert due to the shear volume of files.  The IT dept. where I work would have noticed.

Not only that, even though in my Air Force days the data storing on computers was much more limited, if you ever happened to access a classified file that you usually did not need it took less than 20 minutes before your phone rang and somebody wanted to know if you had a good reason to access it. I can't imagine getting away with 170 files at the time...never mind 1.7 million.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me

#8    Awake2Chaos

Awake2Chaos

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Closed
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 862 posts
  • Joined:29 Dec 2013

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:38 PM

View Postaztek, on 09 January 2014 - 08:33 PM, said:

not if he was sys admin there, or had administartive priviliges. he was  the IT dep. there. he was not a guy from the street, he was supporting the network.

Ahh....I wonder why they went with a contractor?  I'm assuming the are free-lance type workers?  I'd be wary as an employer subing out something as critical as my IT system.


#9    aztek

aztek

    Omnipotent Entity

  • Member
  • 9,612 posts
  • Joined:12 Nov 2006

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:46 PM

i wonder the same thing. but i doubt it would make much difference if he was a army enlisted, or even officer.
didn't we put a us army private for 35 years in jail for doing same thing?  forgot his name.  he was supplying files to wikileaks.

RESIDENT TROLL.

#10    questionmark

questionmark

    Cinicus Magnus

  • Member
  • 39,725 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greece and Des Moines, IA

  • In a flat world there is an explanation to everything.

Posted 09 January 2014 - 08:47 PM

View PostAwake2Chaos, on 09 January 2014 - 08:38 PM, said:

Ahh....I wonder why they went with a contractor?  I'm assuming the are free-lance type workers?  I'd be wary as an employer subing out something as critical as my IT system.

Because some people actually believe that contractors are "cheaper"...and now we got the bill.

A skeptic is a well informed believer and a pessimist a well informed optimist
The most dangerous views of the world are from those who have never seen it. ~ Alexander v. Humboldt
If you want to bulls**t me please do it so that it takes me more than a minute to find out

about me




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users