Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 3 votes

Investigate 9/11 Super Bowl Interview


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2012 replies to this topic

#271    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 32,610 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 February 2014 - 04:28 PM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 27 February 2014 - 01:44 PM, said:

That said, I am certain of only one thing--the OCT is a bright and shining lie.  

On the contrary, facts and evidence support the official story, not your fantasies.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#272    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 32,610 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 February 2014 - 04:33 PM

View Postthunkerdrone, on 27 February 2014 - 01:49 PM, said:

It would be easy to conceal the empty portions of the structure from a daytime climber on the exterior.

False! There was no way to dispose of tons of debris during structural pre-weakening operations without anyone noticing. Such an operation is very dirty and creates a lot of noise and distractions. It takes many months of preparation just to demolish a building half the size of the WTC towers, so what makes you think someone can bring down the WTC buildings overnight?

Once again, you have been watching too many Hollywood action movies because your comments do not reflect reality.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#273    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 32,610 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 February 2014 - 04:36 PM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 27 February 2014 - 01:31 PM, said:

You're so deep in denial it's not funny.

You're so deep in denial it's not funny. I think I cleared that up for you.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#274    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 32,610 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006

Posted 27 February 2014 - 04:48 PM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 27 February 2014 - 01:31 PM, said:


View PostBabe Ruth, on 27 February 2014 - 01:31 PM, said:

Swan

You're so deep in denial it's not funny.  Cahill and the DELTA Groups air monitoring results have been linked here at UM, somewhere.  You probably know that, but anybody who has been paying attention to this discussion knows that.  EPA had not arranged for air monitoring, but local authorities did, by way of bringing Cahill from California.  Christopher Bollyn covers it in detail, from the day it happened.

Oh yeah, I forgot--you don't believe Bollyn or Cahill, down there in your Ivory Cellar.

Thunker

Keep up the good work.  The truth will prevail, no matter the epidemic of denial manifest here.
Cahill and the DELTA Groups air monitoring results have been linked here at UM, somewhere.  You probably know that, but anybody who has been paying attention to this discussion knows that.  EPA had not arranged for air monitoring, but local authorities did, by way of bringing Cahill from California.  Christopher Bollyn covers it in detail, from the day it happened.


Apparently, the report didn't say what you have claimed. Once again, another very good reason why you cannot be taken seriously.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#275    Phaeton80

Phaeton80

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,041 posts
  • Joined:28 Jun 2013

Posted 27 February 2014 - 07:37 PM

I think it is very unwise to lay focus on and/or claim things like 'hollow buildings' and '911 nukes'. It is extremely counterproductive.


#276    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Closed
  • 8,732 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011

Posted 27 February 2014 - 07:44 PM

View PostMerc14, on 27 February 2014 - 02:23 PM, said:

So you believe in teh magic of astrology as well?  



You don't sem to agree on any details at all and what Thunker is postulating is so bizarre and ridiculous that one would think you'd chastise him for embarrassing the movement.



So you prove this theory by letting every crackpot out there postulate the most surreal and bizarre scenarios conceivable and cheer them for doing so?   If you are trying to bring people into your fold then you and your ilk are going about it the wrong way.

The 'magic' of astrology?  R U serious?  No, I don't consider astrology any sort of magic.  It is simply an interesting way to understand some individuals.  It's fascinating how consistent it can be in that regard.

It appears you operate on the fallacy that I am "trying to bring people into [my] fold", but then you operate under a number of fallacies it would seem.

No, I'm just here for the discussion, however crude it may get from time to time.  Another person's delusions, misunderstandings or dissonance neither breaks my leg nor picks my pocket.  I do not really care what other people think, but I do enjoy lively discussion.

Vive le difference.

Edited by Babe Ruth, 27 February 2014 - 07:46 PM.


#277    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Closed
  • 8,732 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011

Posted 27 February 2014 - 07:53 PM

View PostPhaeton80, on 27 February 2014 - 07:37 PM, said:

I think it is very unwise to lay focus on and/or claim things like 'hollow buildings' and '911 nukes'. It is extremely counterproductive.

As I understand it, the 'hollow building' idea is more a figure of speech than anything else, a description that is figuratively true, but not literally true.  I personally know 2 people who were actually in the building that day.  Further, I personally visited the towers on several occasions including dinner at Windows on the World.  The building WAS occupied.  The only question in my mind is HOW occupied.

As to the nuke theory, that is the ONLY theory so far advanced by anybody that fully explains what was observed there.  Another figure of speech here--the nuclear theory is a unified theory.  In terms of damage done and things observed, it is the only theory that accounts for everything seen.


#278    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Closed
  • 8,732 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011

Posted 27 February 2014 - 07:55 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 27 February 2014 - 04:36 PM, said:

You're so deep in denial it's not funny. I think I cleared that up for you.

Aw heck, I'm flattered Sky--you've adopted my descriptive term, 'deep in denial'.  They say imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. :yes:


#279    Merc14

Merc14

    anti-woo magician

  • Member
  • 9,132 posts
  • Joined:03 Mar 2011

Posted 27 February 2014 - 08:10 PM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 27 February 2014 - 07:53 PM, said:

As I understand it, the 'hollow building' idea is more a figure of speech than anything else, a description that is figuratively true, but not literally true.  I personally know 2 people who were actually in the building that day.  Further, I personally visited the towers on several occasions including dinner at Windows on the World.  The building WAS occupied.  The only question in my mind is HOW occupied.

You aren't reading what that boy is typing out because that is not what he is saying, at all.  As far as how occupied you caould watch teh video and see thousands exiting even though it was relatively early in teh morning.

View PostBabe Ruth, on 27 February 2014 - 07:53 PM, said:

As to the nuke theory, that is the ONLY theory so far advanced by anybody that fully explains what was observed there.  Another figure of speech here--the nuclear theory is a unified theory.  In terms of damage done and things observed, it is the only theory that accounts for everything seen.

You mean the silently exploding, leave no radioactive fallout and make no gas cloud nukes?  Yeah, that is a real theory.

Believing when there is no compelling evidence is a mistake.  The idea is to withhold belief until there is compelling evidence and if the universe does not comply with our predispositions, okay, then we have the wrenching obligation to accommodate to the way the universe really is.  - Carl Sagan

"There is no difference between Communism and Socialism, except in the same ultimate end:  Communism proposes to enslave men by force, Socialism-by the vote.  It is merely the difference between murder and suicide."  - Ayn Rand

#280    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Closed
  • 8,732 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011

Posted 27 February 2014 - 08:23 PM

Here's a new term and acronym for you Merc.

Minimum Residual Radiation, MRR.

That, as a possible goal for those designing nuclear devices.

Naw, you've never heard of it, so it must not exist, eh?


#281    DecoNoir

DecoNoir

    The Entertainer

  • Member
  • 2,784 posts
  • Joined:19 Jun 2013

Posted 27 February 2014 - 08:31 PM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 27 February 2014 - 08:23 PM, said:

Here's a new term and acronym for you Merc.

Minimum Residual Radiation, MRR.

That, as a possible goal for those designing nuclear devices.

Naw, you've never heard of it, so it must not exist, eh?

Still need to navigate the problem of critical mass, and getting rid of the EMP. To name a few things...

I reject your reality, and substitute my own! Mostly because yours is boring as hell.

#282    Phaeton80

Phaeton80

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,041 posts
  • Joined:28 Jun 2013

Posted 27 February 2014 - 09:13 PM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 27 February 2014 - 07:53 PM, said:

As I understand it, the 'hollow building' idea is more a figure of speech than anything else, a description that is figuratively true, but not literally true.  I personally know 2 people who were actually in the building that day.  Further, I personally visited the towers on several occasions including dinner at Windows on the World.  The building WAS occupied.  The only question in my mind is HOW occupied.

As to the nuke theory, that is the ONLY theory so far advanced by anybody that fully explains what was observed there.  Another figure of speech here--the nuclear theory is a unified theory.  In terms of damage done and things observed, it is the only theory that accounts for everything seen.

I just dont think this is the time or the place to focus on those theories. Although I realize others did it for you (probably with the very intent to lure you into re entering that particular debate), again; I dont think it wise to grant them that.


#283    RaptorBites

RaptorBites

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 2,208 posts
  • Joined:12 Jan 2012

Posted 27 February 2014 - 09:24 PM

View PostPhaeton80, on 27 February 2014 - 09:13 PM, said:



I just dont think this is the time or the place to focus on those theories. Although I realize others did it for you (probably with the very intent to lure you into re entering that particular debate), again; I dont think it wise to grant them that.

Agreed.

He has been asked to return to the Nuke 9/11 thread multiple times.

No, you surround yourself with a whole different kettle of crazy. - Sir Wearer of Hats

#284    frenat

frenat

    Poltergeist

  • Member
  • 3,141 posts
  • Joined:22 Jun 2005

Posted 27 February 2014 - 10:32 PM

View Postthunkerdrone, on 27 February 2014 - 07:24 AM, said:


The reality is they never went to the moon,
Off topic for this thread but I'll bet you can't prove this.  I'd love to see you open a new thread and try though.

-Reality is not determined by your lack of comprehension.
-Never let facts stand in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
-If I wanted to pay for commercials I couldn't skip I'd sign up for Hulu Plus.
-There are no bad ideas, just great ideas that go horribly wrong.
If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law

#285    Merc14

Merc14

    anti-woo magician

  • Member
  • 9,132 posts
  • Joined:03 Mar 2011

Posted 28 February 2014 - 03:05 AM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 27 February 2014 - 08:23 PM, said:

Here's a new term and acronym for you Merc.

Minimum Residual Radiation, MRR.

That, as a possible goal for those designing nuclear devices.

Naw, you've never heard of it, so it must not exist, eh?

Yeah, that has been explained.

Believing when there is no compelling evidence is a mistake.  The idea is to withhold belief until there is compelling evidence and if the universe does not comply with our predispositions, okay, then we have the wrenching obligation to accommodate to the way the universe really is.  - Carl Sagan

"There is no difference between Communism and Socialism, except in the same ultimate end:  Communism proposes to enslave men by force, Socialism-by the vote.  It is merely the difference between murder and suicide."  - Ayn Rand