Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Non - human mathematics....


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1    keithisco

keithisco

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,521 posts
  • Joined:06 May 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southampton, Blighty!

Posted 20 February 2014 - 06:31 PM

Intriguing... and very fascinating.

Quote

If no human can check a proof of a theorem, does it really count as mathematics? That's the intriguing question raised by the latest computer-assisted proof. It is as large as the entire content of Wikipedia, making it unlikely that will ever be checked by a human being.


Read more, courtesy of New Scientist: http://www.newscient...S&#.UwZID2J5PeI


#2    Mikko-kun

Mikko-kun

    Drifter

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,970 posts
  • Joined:27 Apr 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Outdoors

  • How much do you don't see?

Posted 20 February 2014 - 07:32 PM

There's six sections of life, each section containing two opposite ends. 1st section is indentity, second is substance, third is learning, fourth is acceptance, fifth is reliance, sixth I dont have a word for yet. But the third, learning, mathemathicians use only the one end of the two opposites in the learning axis, the end of spesific learning, where we focus on details and what we can confirm. The other end where we handle wholes, big pictures and things we often can't confirm, needs to be used and suitable methods of studying developed to utilise this end of our learning spectrum.

In short, mathemathics will become more reliant on insight and intuition in future.

Wherever there's a problem, there's solutions.
Answers are found from a wide deep perspective, from opened mind's eyes.
From where good and bad stay silent and you hear the real cause and effect, and big picture.
Giving up is wasting your time, but also necessary to find the true cause you didn't find yet.
Staying in the path is necessary only when there's trueness in that path.

#3    keithisco

keithisco

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,521 posts
  • Joined:06 May 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Southampton, Blighty!

Posted 20 February 2014 - 08:34 PM

My take on this is that humans will become incapable of handling the Big Maths, and therefore any true mathematical proof lie outside of the realm of Human comprehension. In effect we are becoming, very quickly, the slaves of our own inventions (ie computers), and that the big proofs (mathematically) will never be truly understood by this particular iteration of hominids.


#4    Moeyoatey

Moeyoatey

    Alien Embryo

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 39 posts
  • Joined:18 Feb 2014
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kentucky

  • A stinky concoction of wet paper and too much reading

Posted 21 February 2014 - 04:00 AM

I agree completely. It's a gradual decline. For instance, I'm taking calculus now and some of the problems will say us a computer algebra system to do this problem. The same problem from a 1960's text is done by hand. Even  from that point something is being lost.


#5    keninsc

keninsc

    Poltergeist

  • Closed
  • 3,234 posts
  • Joined:08 Mar 2012
  • Gender:Not Selected

  • The problem with people who have no vices is that generally you can be pretty sure they're going to have some pretty annoying virtues. Liz Taylor

Posted 23 February 2014 - 05:45 AM

What you have to understand in mathematics is that you often have to make an assumption, or for lack of a better term, a leap of faith to go to the next level. Computers can't do that, humans can and do all the time. We have the ability to see beyond the provable and take the step. This is what separates us from machines.


#6    StarMountainKid

StarMountainKid

    Cheese

  • Member
  • 5,503 posts
  • Joined:17 Feb 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Star Mountain, Corporate States of America

  • We have problems because we stray from what is innocent and pure.

Posted 24 February 2014 - 07:19 PM

What happens when computers design better computers than themselves using the math we humans cannot understand?

The acceptance of authority does not lead to intelligence.
A mind untouched by thought...the end of knowledge.
To see reality loose your opinions.

#7    Xynoplas

Xynoplas

    Apparition

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 287 posts
  • Joined:16 Dec 2013

Posted 24 February 2014 - 07:46 PM

The map is not the territory.

Math, like science, is a human reaction to the cosmos, but only describes those parts of the cosmos that math and science can describe.

“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” -The Buddha

http://bugsinspace.wordpress.com/




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users