Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


* * * - - 2 votes

AG Holder tells state AGs to ignore laws


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#1    danielost

danielost

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 29,459 posts
  • Joined:26 Nov 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the only known inhabited planet in the universe

Posted 25 February 2014 - 09:56 PM

AG Holder tells state AGs to ignore state laws and constitutions on same sex marriages, if they don't agree with them.

So not only is obama ignoring federal law and constitution.  He is now telling others to do the same with the states.

This is wrong!

I am a mormon.  If I don't use mormons believe, those my beliefs only.
I do not go to church haven't for thirty years.
There are other mormons on this site. So if I have misspoken about the beliefs. I welcome their input.
I am not perfect and never will be. I do strive to be true to myself. I do my best to stay true to the mormon faith. Thank for careing and if you don't peace be with you.

#2    Yes_Man

Yes_Man

    hi

  • Member
  • 8,162 posts
  • Joined:22 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portsmouth

Posted 25 February 2014 - 10:01 PM

link? and who is AG?


#3    Jeremiah65

Jeremiah65

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,991 posts
  • Joined:25 Jun 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The mists at the edge of your dreams...

  • "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." Aristotle

Posted 25 February 2014 - 10:08 PM

:blink: .....Yeah you need to give some back up info here.

Not sure the premise of your statements.  Is he telling Attorney Generals in the states that have same sex marriage to ignore the laws if they disagree and thus do not sue the state?

Or...

Is he telling the state Attorney generals in states that ban same sex marriage to ignore the laws and not sue the state for the right?

I don't get it...

Perhaps he is saying "stop filling up the USA Supreme Court with stupid crap"

Maybe he should tell all those AG's to ignore the laws on certain herbal things as well...perhaps prostitution too....might help with the prison population and cost...

"Liberty means responsibility.  That is why most men dread it."  George Bernard Shaw
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it."  Thomas Jefferson

Posted Image

#4    danielost

danielost

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 29,459 posts
  • Joined:26 Nov 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the only known inhabited planet in the universe

Posted 25 February 2014 - 10:13 PM

http://www.americant...riage_laws.html


Can an attorney general do this - urge state attorney generals not to enforce the law?


When it comes to gay marriage, yes.


Reuters:


The United States' top law enforcement official has launched into the divisive gay marriage debate by telling a newspaper his state counterparts do not have to defend laws and bans in court that they think are discriminatory.




Sorry got lazy.

I am a mormon.  If I don't use mormons believe, those my beliefs only.
I do not go to church haven't for thirty years.
There are other mormons on this site. So if I have misspoken about the beliefs. I welcome their input.
I am not perfect and never will be. I do strive to be true to myself. I do my best to stay true to the mormon faith. Thank for careing and if you don't peace be with you.

#5    Jeremiah65

Jeremiah65

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,991 posts
  • Joined:25 Jun 2012
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The mists at the edge of your dreams...

  • "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." Aristotle

Posted 25 February 2014 - 10:28 PM

If an AG chooses to ignore a law and not prosecute someone for getting married illegally....that doesn't make their marriage legal...it just means it has not been prosecuted...yet.  They will still not receive tax breaks or the benefit of inheritance laws and power of attorney...

So...he is saying ..."use your own judgement at the state level"...

Maybe I am missing something, but I personally would prefer the fed gov get out of the middle of crap and let the people of the individual states decide what they want for themselves.  States need to be empowered to govern themselves, not the other way around...our founding fathers DID NOT want a centralized government bullying the individual states into submission...

"Liberty means responsibility.  That is why most men dread it."  George Bernard Shaw
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it."  Thomas Jefferson

Posted Image

#6    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 13,620 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • Because what came before never seems enough...

Posted 25 February 2014 - 11:11 PM

View PostJeremiah65, on 25 February 2014 - 10:28 PM, said:

If an AG chooses to ignore a law and not prosecute someone for getting married illegally....that doesn't make their marriage legal...it just means it has not been prosecuted...yet.  They will still not receive tax breaks or the benefit of inheritance laws and power of attorney...

So...he is saying ..."use your own judgement at the state level"...

Maybe I am missing something, but I personally would prefer the fed gov get out of the middle of crap and let the people of the individual states decide what they want for themselves.  States need to be empowered to govern themselves, not the other way around...our founding fathers DID NOT want a centralized government bullying the individual states into submission...
On THIS issue sure... bu since when did the USAG or the president get to start deciding which laws they would uphold?  Lawlessness spreads like a cancer once it starts.  If the people see the highest elected officials getting away with it how long before they begin to expect to do the same?  This is taking us down a road we do NOT want to see the end of...

  We've cast the world, we've set the stage,
  for what could be, the darkest age...

#7    Mantis914

Mantis914

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,082 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lone Star State

  • You have shown me a strange image, and they are strange prisoners. Plato

Posted 25 February 2014 - 11:54 PM

I would like to know what Apple, American Airlines and the Super Bowl Committee's interests are in gay marriage.  Why the big rush now in pressuring the Gov of Arizona?


#8    Beany

Beany

    Government Agent

  • 3,262 posts
  • Joined:26 Jul 2011
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:California

  • If music is the most universal language just think of me as one whole note. Nikki Giovanni

Posted 26 February 2014 - 02:03 AM

If you've never broken a law, raise your hand. The anti-gay laws, in my opinion, are discriminatory, doesn't matter whether the voters approved the legislation. Something can be legal and discriminatory, each of us needs to follow our conscience on issues like this. Nor should the majority religious group force their beliefs & mores on a minority group to create and maintain social, civil, economic and legal inequities.

Edited by Beany, 26 February 2014 - 02:04 AM.


#9    ninjadude

ninjadude

    Seeker of truths

  • Member
  • 10,989 posts
  • Joined:11 Sep 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois

  • "dirt collects at the interfaces"

Posted 26 February 2014 - 02:30 AM

View Postdanielost, on 25 February 2014 - 10:13 PM, said:

Can an attorney general do this - urge state attorney generals not to enforce the law?

of course. The executive branch of any government body chooses what laws to enforce. Didn't you know this?

"Whatever you can do or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it. Begin it now!""
- Friedrich Nietzsche

#10    F3SS

F3SS

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,388 posts
  • Joined:11 Jun 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pittsburgh, Pa

Posted 26 February 2014 - 03:26 AM

^^^I always thought they were there to enforce laws, not choose which ones they want to enforce.

View PostBeany, on 26 February 2014 - 02:03 AM, said:

If you've never broken a law, raise your hand. The anti-gay laws, in my opinion, are discriminatory, doesn't matter whether the voters approved the legislation. Something can be legal and discriminatory, each of us needs to follow our conscience on issues like this. Nor should the majority religious group force their beliefs & mores on a minority group to create and maintain social, civil, economic and legal inequities.

My conscience may not agree with a great many laws. So if I view laws as discriminatory in my opinion I should disregard them? Mostly, what's the point of voting for legislation then? Or what's the point of a vote at all?

Posted Image

#11    MiskatonicGrad

MiskatonicGrad

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 562 posts
  • Joined:19 Apr 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dunwich USA

  • "the natural progress of things is liberty to yield and goverment to gain ground." Thomas Jefferson

Posted 26 February 2014 - 03:56 AM

I believe this is coming to a head in my state VA the newly elected attorney general (AG) was silent on the gay marriage issue during the entire campaign and after one of the closet elections in state history. (hours after he is sworn in) he comes out and says he feels the law that was voted on by the state in 2006 is unconstitutional and won't enforce it. Now I would understand if he would have brought it up during the campaign and let the voters know where he stood but this seems a little underhanded.
I figure he wouldn't have stood a chance at being elected if he brought it up so he was moot on the point and the republican candidate would have been roasted by the media if he brought it up. So there you go again the media does a stellar job smoke screening the election so we the voters have very little info to go on and now we have a constitutional crisis on our hands.

Freedom of the press working hard to keep you as ill informed as possible.

"Were we directed from Washington when to sow, and when to reap, we should soon want bread" --Thomas Jefferson(1821)

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session"--Mark Twain(1866)

"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." --Thomas Jefferson(1800)

#12    Wickian

Wickian

    Doppelganger

  • Member
  • 3,829 posts
  • Joined:11 May 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA

  • Save it for Queen Doppelpoppellus!

Posted 26 February 2014 - 05:37 AM

I don't care much about gay marriage so long as the only thing they're entitled to is the legal status.  Churches should not be forced to perform religious ceremonies for them.

Edited by Wickian, 26 February 2014 - 05:38 AM.


#13    danielost

danielost

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 29,459 posts
  • Joined:26 Nov 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the only known inhabited planet in the universe

Posted 26 February 2014 - 10:17 AM

View PostBeany, on 26 February 2014 - 02:03 AM, said:

If you've never broken a law, raise your hand. The anti-gay laws, in my opinion, are discriminatory, doesn't matter whether the voters approved the legislation. Something can be legal and discriminatory, each of us needs to follow our conscience on issues like this. Nor should the majority religious group force their beliefs & mores on a minority group to create and maintain social, civil, economic and legal inequities.

But, the minor religious group can force their views on the rest of us.  The at of a state or fed. gov. should not Dec ide which laws to follow.  They should enforce them all or have the elected officials change the law.

I am a mormon.  If I don't use mormons believe, those my beliefs only.
I do not go to church haven't for thirty years.
There are other mormons on this site. So if I have misspoken about the beliefs. I welcome their input.
I am not perfect and never will be. I do strive to be true to myself. I do my best to stay true to the mormon faith. Thank for careing and if you don't peace be with you.

#14    Agent0range

Agent0range

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,347 posts
  • Joined:10 Apr 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pennsylvania

Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:43 PM

View PostF3SS, on 26 February 2014 - 03:26 AM, said:

^^^I always thought they were there to enforce laws, not choose which ones they want to enforce.



My conscience may not agree with a great many laws. So if I view laws as discriminatory in my opinion I should disregard them? Mostly, what's the point of voting for legislation then? Or what's the point of a vote at all?

Oh c'mon..you take the legal high road when it is a law that you agree with?  You have advocated the breaking of laws that you don't agree with many times on this forum.


#15    Mantis914

Mantis914

    Psychic Spy

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,082 posts
  • Joined:26 Jun 2007
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lone Star State

  • You have shown me a strange image, and they are strange prisoners. Plato

Posted 26 February 2014 - 04:37 PM

View Postninjadude, on 26 February 2014 - 02:30 AM, said:

of course. The executive branch of any government body chooses what laws to enforce. Didn't you know this?

No one ever sent me that memo... although, Holder's pretty much been able to get away with murder...

I always thought that that is why there is (at least there was) a system of checks and balances within our system so one branch doesn't get away with what it is doing these days...   the President can't just pick and choose which laws to enforce, that's nothing short of a dictatorship!





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users