Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Peruvian Skulls


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
6 replies to this topic

#1    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London UK

  • It is later than you think.

Posted 09 April 2014 - 06:02 PM

Brien Foerster has been exploring the Peruvian elongated skulls for some time and particularly from the Paracas area.  These characteristically have red hair and some have such extreme enlargement that they could not have been the result of artificial deformation practised elsewhere.

The enlarged eyeball sockets and cranial sutres also indicate abnormal characteristics.

Early DNA testing supports Foerster's hypothesis that these belong to a hominid hybrid and not to the conventional evolutionary human line.

Type into youtube:

Windows On The World: Brien Foerster Interview /Skull found in Peru

Posted Image


#2    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London UK

  • It is later than you think.

Posted 09 April 2014 - 06:23 PM

It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.


http://www.ancient-o...ased-incredible

Edited by zoser, 09 April 2014 - 06:24 PM.

Posted Image


#3    Yes_Man

Yes_Man

    hi

  • Member
  • 8,592 posts
  • Joined:22 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portsmouth

Posted 09 April 2014 - 06:23 PM

debunked like a 100000000 times and its human dna


#4    Yes_Man

Yes_Man

    hi

  • Member
  • 8,592 posts
  • Joined:22 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portsmouth

Posted 09 April 2014 - 06:25 PM

View Postzoser, on 09 April 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:

It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.


http://www.ancient-o...ased-incredible
its 100% human, if you disagree feel free to email or write a letter to the dna testers explaning why that you think these are not 100% human dna or even human.


#5    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London UK

  • It is later than you think.

Posted 09 April 2014 - 06:32 PM

View PostYes_Man, on 09 April 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:

debunked like a 100000000 times and its human dna

Wishful thinking I'm afraid.

However, while cranial deformation changes the shape of the skull, it does not alter its volume, weight, or other features that are characteristic of a regular skull. The Paracas skulls, however, are different.

The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional  meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening.
http://higherperspec...incredible.html

Nothing I didn't already know.  I'll leave the skeptics to squabble and flap over this one.
Good luck.

:lol:

Edited by zoser, 09 April 2014 - 06:34 PM.

Posted Image


#6    zoser

zoser

    Sapphire

  • Member
  • 10,009 posts
  • Joined:19 Aug 2009
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London UK

  • It is later than you think.

Posted 09 April 2014 - 06:35 PM

View PostYes_Man, on 09 April 2014 - 06:25 PM, said:

its 100% human, if you disagree feel free to email or write a letter to the dna testers explaning why that you think these are not 100% human dna or even human.

Be my guest.  Good luck.

Posted Image


#7    Still Waters

Still Waters

    Deeply Mysterious

  • 39,863 posts
  • Joined:01 Jun 2008
  • Gender:Female

  • "Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better." - Albert Einstein

Posted 09 April 2014 - 06:38 PM

View Postzoser, on 09 April 2014 - 06:23 PM, said:

It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.


http://www.ancient-o...ased-incredible
We already have a thread about this. Same source link too.

http://www.unexplain...howtopic=262007

*Closed*

Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users