Jump to content




Welcome to Unexplained Mysteries! Please sign in or create an account to start posting and to access a host of extra features.


- - - - -

Collateral Damage: U.S. Covert Operations

conspiracy 911 cover up financial political crime

  • Please log in to reply
454 replies to this topic

#1    Phaeton80

Phaeton80

    Paranormal Investigator

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 770 posts
  • Joined:28 Jun 2013
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam

  • "Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who could not hear the music.."

Posted 29 May 2014 - 03:57 PM

A well researched article with an interesting and detailed look at some of the lesser known aspects surrounding or in relation to the event, painting an equally interesting scenario. Quite a read, but its worth it imo.

Abstract:

Quote

Collateral Damage: U.S. Covert Operations and the Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001

On September 11, 2001 the definition of National Security changed for most U.S. citizens.
For an entire postwar generation, “National Security” meant protection from nuclear attack. On that day, Americans redefined that threat. On September 11, 2001 three hijacked airliners hit three separate buildings with such precision and skill that many observers believe those flights were controlled by something other than the poorly trained hijackers in the cockpits. This report contends that not only were the buildings targets, but that specific offices within each building were the designated targets. These offices unknowingly held information which if exposed, subsequently would expose a national security secret of unimaginable magnitude. Protecting that secret was the motivation for the September 11th attacks. This report is about that national security secret: its origins and impact.

The intent of the report is to provide a context for understanding the events of September 11th rather than to define exactly what happened that day. Initially, it is difficult to see a pattern to the destruction of September 11th other than the total destruction of the World Trade Center, a segment of the Pentagon, four commercial aircraft and the loss of 2,993 lives. However, if the perceived objective of the attack is re-defined from its commonly suggested ‘symbolic’ designation as either ‘a terrorist attack’ or a ‘new Pearl Harbor,’ and one begins by looking at it as purely a crime with specific objectives (as opposed to a political action), there is a compelling logic to the pattern of destruction. This article provides research into the early claims by Dick Eastman, Tom Flocco, V.K. Durham and Karl Schwarz that the September 11th attacks were meant as a cover-up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on September 11th.[1]

After six years of research, this report presents corroborating evidence which supports their claims, and proposes a new rationale for the September 11th attacks. In doing so, many of the anomalies – or inconvenient facts surrounding this event - take on a meaning that is consistent with the claims of Eastman et al. The hypothesis of this report is: the attacks of September 11th were intended to cover-up the clearing of $240 billion dollars in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which ‘unknown’ western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry, with a focus on oil and gas. The attacks of September 11th also served to derail multiple Federal investigations away from crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. In doing so, the attacks were justified under the cardinal rule of intelligence: “protect your resources” [2] and consistent with a modus operandi of sacrificing lives for a greater cause.


http://www.scribd.co...unding-Targeted


Edited by Phaeton80, 29 May 2014 - 03:58 PM.


#2    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 29,695 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 29 May 2014 - 04:32 PM

View PostPhaeton80, on 29 May 2014 - 03:57 PM, said:

A well researched article with an interesting and detailed look at some of the lesser known aspects surrounding or in relation to the event, painting an equally interesting scenario. Quite a read, but its worth it imo.

Abstract:

The information from your link is highly flawed and inaccurate and the claims of 9/11 CT'ers have been successfully debunked with facts and evidence.

Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda have admitted to their responsibility for the 911 attack and furthermore, intelligence warnings from around the world had pointed their fingers at the terrorist, not the U.S. government. In other words, there was no U.S. covert operation regarding the 9/11 attack.

If you had illegal information stored on your computer that you wanted to destroy, what would be the best approach to destroy that evidence?

1.   Fly an airplane into your house

2.   Simply remove and thoroughly destroy your computer's hard drive.


Even a damaged hard drive can still reveal information. There have been people posting disinformation on the Internet for the purpose of discrediting the 911 Truther movement and they have been doing a very good job.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#3    and then

and then

    Abyssus Abyssum Invocat

  • Member
  • 12,861 posts
  • Joined:15 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Land's End

  • Because what came before never seems enough...

Posted 29 May 2014 - 05:05 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 29 May 2014 - 04:32 PM, said:

The information from your link is highly flawed and inaccurate and the claims of 9/11 CT'ers have been successfully debunked with facts and evidence.

Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda have admitted to their responsibility for the 911 attack and furthermore, intelligence warnings from around the world had pointed their fingers at the terrorist, not the U.S. government. In other words, there was no U.S. covert operation regarding the 9/11 attack.

If you had illegal information stored on your computer that you wanted to destroy, what would be the best approach to destroy that evidence?

1.   Fly an airplane into your house

2.   Simply remove and thoroughly destroy your computer's hard drive.


Even a damaged hard drive can still reveal information. There have been people posting disinformation on the Internet for the purpose of discrediting the 911 Truther movement and they have been doing a very good job.
Ever try keeping a secret that more than one person is aware of?  Imagine having HUNDREDS involved... yeah, conspiracy seems really plausible  :w00t:

  Imagination is the power in the turn of a phrase.

#4    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 29,695 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 29 May 2014 - 06:21 PM

View Postand then, on 29 May 2014 - 05:05 PM, said:

Ever try keeping a secret that more than one person is aware of?  Imagine having HUNDREDS involved... yeah, conspiracy seems really plausible  :w00t:

You are correct! Hundreds if not thousands, would have been involved and even then, such an operation could have been easily revealed.

First of all, only a certain number of B-757-200 and B-767-200 series aircraft were built and are traceable. For an example, four B-757's were built and they are listed below:

1. B-757, tail # 0001
2. B-757, tail # 0002
3. B-757, tail # 0003
4. B-757, tail # 0004

One of those aircraft was involved in a crash and the remaining aircraft are:

1. B-757, tail # 0001
2. B-757, tail # 0002
3  B-757, tail # 0004

Question: Which aircraft was involved in the crash?

In addition, there was no way the airlines would have grounded their aircraft for many months in order to have them modified illegally to fly under remote control, however, flight data records show that at no time were those aircraft flown under remote control.

. Since the B-767 and B-757 are not fly-by-wire aircraft, such modifications would have resulted in the redesign of the control system of those aircraft and that would have not only involved American Airlines and United Airlines, but the Boeing Aircraft Co. and its subcontractors as well. which would have left paper trails across the United States and around the world.

Another claim of 911 Truthers, is that United 175 was modified with a pod that was used to carry explosives. Question is, why modify that aircraft to carry 1000+ pounds of explosives in a pod when over 20,000 pounds of explosives can be carried in the cargo holds without modifying anything? Adding explosives isn't going to have that much of an  impact on the steel structure anyway if explosives are not firmly attached to the steel structures. As it was, they confused aerodynamic fairings and even the MLG doors as an attached pod. In one case, the lower paint scheme of United 175 was confused as an attached pod and to put that argument to rest, I posted another B-767 with the same paint scheme on its lower fuselage.

It is simply amazing just how easy 911 Truthers can be duped.

Each aircraft has its own unique signatures, even among aircraft of the same models and there was no way they could have been switched. As an airframe technician/inspector, I have often said that it would have taken me less than 30 minutes to reveal a switched aircraft and no one in their right mind within the U.S. government would have even dreamed of using such aircraft in such an attack as we saw on 9/11/2001. In doing so, they would have found themselves behind bars and subject to the death penalty with tons of evidence stacked against them.

That would have included engineers, technicians, test pilots, contractors, sub-contractors and anyone else connected to such an operation as we saw on 9/11/2001.


.

Edited by skyeagle409, 29 May 2014 - 06:28 PM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#5    Rafterman

Rafterman

    Majestic 12 Operative

  • Member
  • 6,102 posts
  • Joined:27 Sep 2010
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upstate

Posted 29 May 2014 - 06:26 PM

View Postskyeagle409, on 29 May 2014 - 04:32 PM, said:

The information from your link is highly flawed and inaccurate and the claims of 9/11 CT'ers have been successfully debunked with facts and evidence.

Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda have admitted to their responsibility for the 911 attack and furthermore, intelligence warnings from around the world had pointed their fingers at the terrorist, not the U.S. government. In other words, there was no U.S. covert operation regarding the 9/11 attack.

If you had illegal information stored on your computer that you wanted to destroy, what would be the best approach to destroy that evidence?

1.   Fly an airplane into your house

2.   Simply remove and thoroughly destroy your computer's hard drive.


Even a damaged hard drive can still reveal information. There have been people posting disinformation on the Internet for the purpose of discrediting the 911 Truther movement and they have been doing a very good job.

Agreed.

It's basically a repackaging of the same old debunked stupidity that the author tries to wrap into some kind of overarching financial conspiracy.

I knew it was going to be a doozie when I saw that an "article" on geoengineering, chemtrails, and HAARP was also recommended - i.e. if you like this crazy assed batshit, you'll LOVE this even crazier assed batshit.

"You can't have freedom of religion without having freedom from the religious beliefs of other people."

#6    Babe Ruth

Babe Ruth

    Non-Corporeal Being

  • Member
  • 7,975 posts
  • Joined:23 Dec 2011
  • Gender:Not Selected
  • Location:27North 80West

Posted 29 May 2014 - 07:22 PM

No doubt Flocco et al are pretty darn close to it.  First ever in its history the SEC invoked the special rule allowing those securities to be cleared anonymously.

The honest investigators at ONI were way too close for comfort at the Pentagon, and they took the vast majority of the casualties.

Great article! :tu:


#7    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 29,695 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 29 May 2014 - 07:28 PM

View PostBabe Ruth, on 29 May 2014 - 07:22 PM, said:

No doubt Flocco et al are pretty darn close to it.  First ever in its history the SEC invoked the special rule allowing those securities to be cleared anonymously.

The honest investigators at ONI were way too close for comfort at the Pentagon, and they took the vast majority of the casualties.

Great article! :tu:

Just to let you know that most of the money in question at the Pentagon has been accounted for. Goes to show that the claim regarding missing funds at the Pentagon was based on ignorance, not facts.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#8    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 29,695 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 29 May 2014 - 07:40 PM

View PostPhaeton80, on 29 May 2014 - 03:57 PM, said:


On September 11, 2001 the definition of National Security changed for most U.S. citizens.
For an entire postwar generation, “National Security” meant protection from nuclear attack. On that day, Americans redefined that threat. On September 11, 2001 three hijacked airliners hit three separate buildings with such precision and skill that many observers believe those flights were controlled by something other than the poorly trained hijackers in the cockpits.

Let's take a look at just hos precise those flights were flown.

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Not what I would call precise maneuvering of the aircraft after disengagement of the autopilots.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#9    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 29,695 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 30 May 2014 - 12:46 AM

View PostRafterman, on 29 May 2014 - 06:26 PM, said:

Agreed.

It's basically a repackaging of the same old debunked stupidity that the author tries to wrap into some kind of overarching financial conspiracy.

I have noticed that claims of 9/11 CT'ers have not only been debunked with facts and evidence, but some claims are known hoaxes. Seems to me this individual is not too happy about the disinformation that has made the 9/11 Truther Movement a laughing stock.

Quote


Disinformation Killed 9/11 “Truth”

By 2009, the 9/11 “Truth” Movement was so inundated with disinformation that it had become a laughingstock. The easily-discredited claims (lies) contaminated the greater issue and soiled dissenters across the board. “Turd blossom” was a Karl Rove phrase that could describe what the movement had devolved into. The media, whether corporate or foundation-funded, could find people ranting about “the Jews” or the Illuminati, the Lizard People, the missiles, holograms, mini-nukes or space beam weapons vaporizing the Twin Towers.

Many trolls, and some public personalities, appeared to be professional disinformation artists hard at work concocting and posting this crap online, which others repeated to their own detriment. One cannot easily prove that a specific person is a paid shill, a disinformation agent, a cyber agent provocateur, but be assured they are out there, and “out there.”

DISINFORMATION TO DISCREDIT

Author Thomas Pynchon wrote, “If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about answers.” I’ll go one better and in the process explain modern cyber disinformation: If they can get you asking stupid questions, then their lapdog media can dismiss you as a “nut.”

http://www.911truth....lled-911-truth/

I have repeatedly warned 9/11 CT'ers that there are folks out there in the world who are deliberately posting disinformation, misinformation, hoaxed videos, hoaxed photos, and lies on the Internet surrounding the 9/11 attack and yet they continued to re-post their flawed and invalid so-called evidence on message boards..

The claim that the 9/11 attack was a  U.S. covert operation is unfounded and baseless. There was no way the U.S. government could have planned and carried out such an attack and not get caught and after more than 12 years, there is not a shred of evidence the 9/11 attack was a U.S. covert operation especially in light of the fact that international intelligence sources have said that al-Qaeda, not the U.S.,government, was responsible for which Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda later admitted their responsibility for the 9/11 attack.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#10    hacktorp

hacktorp

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 553 posts
  • Joined:11 Dec 2010

Posted 30 May 2014 - 12:59 AM

Skyeagle sounds more desperate with every post.

Trying to sweep back the tide with a whisk broom can feel pointless after a while.


#11    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 29,695 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 30 May 2014 - 02:14 AM

View Posthacktorp, on 30 May 2014 - 12:59 AM, said:

Skyeagle sounds more desperate with every post.

Trying to sweep back the tide with a whisk broom can feel pointless after a while.

i am pointing out the fact there is no evidence of a U.S. government 9/11 conspiracy. Basically speaking, 9/11 Truthers are disrespecting those who have lost family members and friends in the 9/11 attack.

Edited by skyeagle409, 30 May 2014 - 02:18 AM.

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX

#12    Reann

Reann

    Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 894 posts
  • Joined:28 Aug 2012

Posted 30 May 2014 - 02:32 AM

View Postskyeagle409, on 29 May 2014 - 04:32 PM, said:

There have been people posting disinformation on the Internet for the purpose of discrediting the 911 Truther movement and they have been doing a very good job.

What does that mean ? It appears that you're  commending those that post disinformation in hopes to discredit something.


#13    hacktorp

hacktorp

    Remote Viewer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 553 posts
  • Joined:11 Dec 2010

Posted 30 May 2014 - 02:36 AM

View Postskyeagle409, on 30 May 2014 - 02:14 AM, said:



i am pointing out the fact there is no evidence of a U.S. government 9/11 conspiracy. Basically speaking, 9/11 Truthers are disrespecting those who have lost family members and friends in the 9/11 attack.

By all means, point away...the real 'disrespectors' of those families and friends are starting to feel the heat and it won't let up...EVER.

And now we have the Bush Administration's own Counter-Terrorism 'Czar' going public to say the Administration's senior officials are guilty of war crimes and should face an international tribunal.

Not gonna be pretty for them...


#14    Reann

Reann

    Conspiracy Theorist

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 894 posts
  • Joined:28 Aug 2012

Posted 30 May 2014 - 02:42 AM

View Postskyeagle409, on 30 May 2014 - 02:14 AM, said:

i am pointing out the fact there is no evidence of a U.S. government 9/11 conspiracy. Basically speaking, 9/11 Truthers are disrespecting those who have lost family members and friends in the 9/11 attack.
I thought that  most  truthers have formed that movement because they had family and friends lost that day . How are they disrespecting anyone if they do not feel content with it all ? They feel a lot differently about it then you obviously do. I don't see them as disrespectful , why would anyone suggest that ? I see them as hurting.. I do see that there is disrespect aimed at them though by individuals who are way too skeptical .


#15    skyeagle409

skyeagle409

    Forum Divinity

  • Member
  • 29,695 posts
  • Joined:14 Apr 2006
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:California

  • Keep Your Mach Up and Check Six

Posted 30 May 2014 - 04:37 AM

View PostReann, on 30 May 2014 - 02:32 AM, said:

What does that mean ? It appears that you're  commending those that post disinformation in hopes to discredit something.

No, that is incorrect. I have explained on a number of occasions to 9/11 CT'ers that what they were posting was disinformation and I knew from over 40 years experience as a pilot and airframe technician/inspector that much of what they were posting was in fact, disinformation.

For an example, let's take the bogus United 175 at Boston's Logan Airport. Did they even stop to think to consider that United Airlines, airport officials, and servicing personnel would have noticed the bogus United 175 sitting on the tarmac? The alarm bells would have been set off within a short period of time after United Airlines personnel begin asking questions about that bogus aircraft.

On another note, who would have paid landing and other fees associated with a bogus United 175? Remember, the B-767 is not a small aircraft. Did they ever stop to think that ATC would have been suspicious of such a flight if an IFR flight plan was filed for that aircraft? It wouldn't take very long to determine the point of embarkation of a bogus United 175, which would then be the focus of an intensive investigation.

Another question, would ATC even have allowed two B-767's with the designation of United 175 to occupy the same airspace?

KEEP YOUR MACH UP AND CHECK SIX





Also tagged with conspiracy, 911, cover up, financial, political, crime

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users